M M Uzzaman1, K Ratnasingham, N Ashraf. 1. Barts and The London NHS Trust, Queen Mary's University, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK. mohsinuzzaman@yahoo.co.uk
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is associated with a low incidence of recurrence; however, the use of heavyweight mesh has been linked with chronic pain and foreign body sensation. It is hypothesized that the use of lightweight mesh may reduce these problems. This study aims to use meta-analysis to compare lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: Information was gathered from randomized controlled trials that compared lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. The Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists were searched. Primary outcome measures were chronic pain, foreign body sensation and hernia recurrence. Secondary outcome measures were duration of surgery, mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, surgical-site infection, testicular atrophy and haematoma/seroma. The pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) was calculated for categorical data and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. RESULTS: Six trials with 1936 hernias were included. Lightweight mesh was associated with reduced chronic pain (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50-0.90; p < 0.01) and foreign body sensation (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.21-0.93; p < 0.05). Lightweight mesh was also associated with lower VAS pain scores at 3 months after surgery (WMD = -0.35, 95% CI = -0.39 to -0.31; p < 0.0001). There were no differences in hernia recurrence (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.54-2.64; p = 0.66) or other post-operative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lightweight mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is associated with less chronic pain, and foreign body sensation compared with heavyweight mesh without any difference in recurrence.
PURPOSE:Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is associated with a low incidence of recurrence; however, the use of heavyweight mesh has been linked with chronic pain and foreign body sensation. It is hypothesized that the use of lightweight mesh may reduce these problems. This study aims to use meta-analysis to compare lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. METHODS: Information was gathered from randomized controlled trials that compared lightweight and heavyweight mesh for Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair. The Cochrane Library, Medline, EMBASE, trial registries, conference proceedings and reference lists were searched. Primary outcome measures were chronic pain, foreign body sensation and hernia recurrence. Secondary outcome measures were duration of surgery, mean visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, surgical-site infection, testicular atrophy and haematoma/seroma. The pooled Peto odds ratio (OR) was calculated for categorical data and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous data. RESULTS: Six trials with 1936 hernias were included. Lightweight mesh was associated with reduced chronic pain (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.50-0.90; p < 0.01) and foreign body sensation (OR = 0.43, 95% CI = 0.21-0.93; p < 0.05). Lightweight mesh was also associated with lower VAS pain scores at 3 months after surgery (WMD = -0.35, 95% CI = -0.39 to -0.31; p < 0.0001). There were no differences in hernia recurrence (OR = 1.19, 95% CI = 0.54-2.64; p = 0.66) or other post-operative complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of lightweight mesh in Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair is associated with less chronic pain, and foreign body sensation compared with heavyweight mesh without any difference in recurrence.
Authors: Sheraz R Markar; Alan Karthikesalingam; Fahreyar Alam; Tjun Y Tang; Stewart R Walsh; Umar Sadat Journal: Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech Date: 2010-08 Impact factor: 1.719
Authors: G Di Vita; S Milano; M Frazzetta; R Patti; V Palazzolo; C Barbera; V Ferlazzo; P Leo; E Cillari Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: J P J Burgmans; C E H Voorbrood; N Schouten; N Smakman; S Elias; G J Clevers; P H P Davids; E J M M Verleisdonk; M E Hamaker; R K J Simmermacher; T van Dalen Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2015-01-01 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Jerry G Blaivas; Rajveer S Purohit; Matthew S Benedon; Gabriel Mekel; Michael Stern; Mubashir Billah; Kola Olugbade; Robert Bendavid; Vladimir Iakovlev Journal: Nat Rev Urol Date: 2015-08-18 Impact factor: 14.432