Literature DB >> 22368129

Congenital cardiac anomalies: prenatal readings versus neonatal outcomes.

Neha Trivedi1, Denis Levy, Maryam Tarsa, Tracy Anton, Caitlin Hartney, Tanya Wolfson, Dolores H Pretorius.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the variation between prenatal and postnatal diagnosis of congenital cardiac lesions diagnosed by both fetal center primary physicians and fetal pediatric cardiologists at a single tertiary referral center in the United States and evaluate why cases were misdiagnosed.
METHODS: A retrospective review of all cardiac abnormalities identified prenatally by level II sonography at a tertiary referral fetal center between January 2006 and December 2008 was performed to include any patient with a fetal cardiac abnormality and with a documented autopsy or neonatal follow-up. Congenital heart disease diagnoses were classified as correct, incorrect, or incorrect but within the same spectrum of disease. Cases of correct diagnosis by primary physicians and pediatric cardiologists were compared.
RESULTS: Sixty patients with fetal heart abnormalities were identified among 8894 patients who had level II sonography. The combined detection rate for fetal heart abnormalities for both primary physicians and pediatric cardiologists together was 81.7%. The detection rates of congenital heart disease were not statistically different between primary physicians and pediatric cardiologists: 77.9% (46 of 59) versus 85.0% (34 of 40; P = .3). The most common cardiac abnormalities misdiagnosed in our study population included pulmonic stenosis, ventricular septal defect, myxoma, truncus arteriosus, and coarctation of the aorta.
CONCLUSIONS: Congenital heart disease is misdiagnosed in tertiary care centers by both pediatric cardiologists and fetal imaging specialists. We believe that this occurrence is related to multiple factors, including evolution of congenital heart disease, maternal body habitus, associated congenital anomalies, decreased amniotic fluid volume, gestational age at evaluation, imaging techniques, and, most importantly, the experience of the sonographer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22368129     DOI: 10.7863/jum.2012.31.3.389

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound Med        ISSN: 0278-4297            Impact factor:   2.153


  4 in total

1.  A Prospective Study of the Use of Fetal Intelligent Navigation Echocardiography (FINE) to Obtain Standard Fetal Echocardiography Views.

Authors:  Paola Veronese; Gianna Bogana; Alessia Cerutti; Lami Yeo; Roberto Romero; Maria Teresa Gervasi
Journal:  Fetal Diagn Ther       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 2.587

Review 2.  Postmortem cardiac imaging in fetuses and children.

Authors:  Andrew M Taylor; Owen J Arthurs; Neil J Sebire
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Prenatal detection of cardiac anomalies in fetuses with single umbilical artery: diagnostic accuracy comparison of maternal-fetal-medicine and pediatric cardiologist.

Authors:  Ilir Tasha; Rachel Brook; Heidi Frasure; Noam Lazebnik
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2014-03-02

Review 4.  "Functionally" univentricular hearts: impact of pre-natal diagnosis.

Authors:  Antonio Francesco Corno
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-02-27       Impact factor: 3.418

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.