Literature DB >> 19395192

Acute toxicity in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with androgen suppression and hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy.

Nadeem Pervez1, Cormac Small, Marc MacKenzie, Don Yee, Matthew Parliament, Sunita Ghosh, Alina Mihai, John Amanie, Albert Murtha, Colin Field, David Murray, Gino Fallone, Robert Pearcey.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To report acute toxicity resulting from radiotherapy (RT) dose escalation and hypofractionation using intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) treatment combined with androgen suppression in high-risk prostate cancer patients. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty patients with a histological diagnosis of high-risk prostatic adenocarcinoma (having either a clinical Stage of > or =T3a or an initial prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level of > or =20 ng/ml or a Gleason score of 8 to 10 or a combination of a PSA concentration of >15 ng/ml and a Gleason score of 7) were enrolled. RT prescription was 68 Gy in 25 fractions (2.72 Gy/fraction) over 5 weeks to the prostate and proximal seminal vesicles. The pelvic lymph nodes and distal seminal vesicles concurrently received 45 Gy in 25 fractions. The patients were treated with helical TomoTherapy-based IMRT and underwent daily megavoltage CT image-guided verification prior to each treatment. Acute toxicity scores were recorded weekly during RT and at 3 months post-RT, using Radiation Therapy Oncology Group acute toxicity scales.
RESULTS: All patients completed RT and follow up for 3 months. The maximum acute toxicity scores were as follows: 21 (35%) patients had Grade 2 gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity; 4 (6.67%) patients had Grade 3 genitourinary (GU) toxicity; and 30 (33.33%) patients had Grade 2 GU toxicity. These toxicity scores were reduced after RT; there were only 8 (13.6%) patients with Grade 1 GI toxicity, 11 (18.97%) with Grade 1 GU toxicity, and 5 (8.62%) with Grade 2 GU toxicity at 3 months follow up. Only the V60 to the rectum correlated with the GI toxicity.
CONCLUSION: Dose escalation using a hypofractionated schedule to the prostate with concurrent pelvic lymph node RT and long-term androgen suppression therapy is well tolerated acutely. Longer follow up for outcome and late toxicity is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 19395192     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.01.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys        ISSN: 0360-3016            Impact factor:   7.038


  15 in total

1.  Toxicity after intensity-modulated, image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Matthias Guckenberger; Sami Ok; Bülent Polat; Reinhart A Sweeney; Michael Flentje
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-09-30       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  Acute toxicity of hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer.

Authors:  C S Drodge; O Boychak; S Patel; N Usmani; J Amanie; M B Parliament; A Murtha; C Field; S Ghosh; N Pervez
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  Dose-escalated simultaneous integrated-boost treatment of prostate cancer patients via helical tomotherapy.

Authors:  M Geier; S T Astner; M N Duma; V Jacob; C Nieder; J Putzhammer; C Winkler; M Molls; H Geinitz
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-02-26       Impact factor: 3.621

4.  Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy with volumetric modulated arc therapy and simultaneous integrated boost for pelvic irradiation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  C Franzese; A Fogliata; G R D'Agostino; L Di Brina; T Comito; P Navarria; L Cozzi; M Scorsetti
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  Toxicity and outcome of pelvic IMRT for node-positive prostate cancer.

Authors:  A-C Müller; J Lütjens; M Alber; F Eckert; M Bamberg; D Schilling; C Belka; U Ganswindt
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  Quality-of-life outcomes in high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with helical tomotherapy in a hypofractionated radiation schedule with long-term androgen suppression.

Authors:  N Pervez; A V Krauze; D Yee; M Parliament; A Mihai; S Ghosh; K Joseph; A Murtha; J Amanie; M Kamal; R Pearcey
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  Comparison of dosimetric parameters and acute toxicity after whole-pelvic vs prostate-only volumetric-modulated arc therapy with daily image guidance for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Kentaro Ishii; Ryo Ogino; Yukinari Hosokawa; Chiaki Fujioka; Wataru Okada; Ryota Nakahara; Ryu Kawamorita; Takuhito Tada; Yoshiki Hayashi; Toshifumi Nakajima
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Standardized cranberry capsules for radiation cystitis in prostate cancer patients in New Zealand: a randomized double blinded, placebo controlled pilot study.

Authors:  Katelin Hamilton; Noelle C Bennett; Gordon Purdie; Patries M Herst
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Reducing radiation-associated toxicity using online image guidance (IGRT) in prostate cancer patients undergoing dose-escalated radiation therapy.

Authors:  Martina Becker-Schiebe; Ali Abaci; Tahera Ahmad; Wolfgang Hoffmann
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2016-02-20

10.  Image-guided radiation therapy: Physician's perspectives.

Authors:  T Gupta; C Anand Narayan
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.