| Literature DB >> 22367125 |
Masaaki Tanaka1, Hiromi Yamada, Takayuki Nakamura, Yasuyoshi Watanabe.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Exposure to a warm environment has been reported to be effective for recovery from mental fatigue. However, there have been no reports examining the effects of a pellet stove on recovery from mental fatigue. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of a pellet stove on recovery from mental fatigue. MATERIAL/Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22367125 PMCID: PMC3560753 DOI: 10.12659/msm.882519
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Med Sci Monit ISSN: 1234-1010
Subjective parameters before and after fatigue-inducing sessions and after recovery session as assessed using a visual analogue scale from 0 (minimum) to 100 (maximum).
| Control | Pellet stove | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Before fatigue | 26.2±26.0 | 16.1±17.2 | 0.166 |
| After fatigue | 47.1±30.8 | 39.3±26.4 | 0.215 |
| After recovery | 25.3±14.7 | 15.9±13.9 | 0.047 |
| Before fatigue | 27.4±20.5 | 32.0±25.0 | 0.131 |
| After fatigue | 14.9±16.7 | 15.3±16.6 | 0.980 |
| After recovery | 39.9±20.0 | 50.5±23.0 | 0.068 |
| Before fatigue | 36.7±17.6 | 29.1±21.7 | 0.174 |
| After fatigue | 19.1±18.9 | 18.1±18.6 | 0.576 |
| After recovery | 35.7±20.7 | 47.0±28.5 | 0.043 |
| Before fatigue | 31.1±23.3 | 32.7±17.2 | 0.587 |
| After fatigue | 23.5±20.3 | 23.4±16.9 | 0.731 |
| After recovery | 35.6±22.9 | 56.5±20.7 | 0.006 |
Data are presented as mean ±SD.
Changes in subjective parameters after the recovery session.
| Control | Pellet stove | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fatigue | −21.9±19.7 | −23.4±26.8 | 0.310 |
| Healing | 25.1±20.9 | 35.2±29.1 | 0.082 |
| Comfort | 16.5±22.4 | 28.9±30.9 | 0.024 |
| Warmth | 12.1±23.4 | 33.1±29.5 | 0.001 |
Data are presented as mean±SD.
Cognitive task and autonomic nervous parameters before and after fatigue-inducing sessions and after recovery session.
| Control | Pellet stove | p value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before fatigue | 587.5±121.3 | 587.9±80.3 | 0.591 |
| After fatigue | 584.2±119.3 | 599.5±87.8 | 0.525 |
| After recovery | 588.3±111.6 | 608.7±93.6 | 0.419 |
| Before fatigue | 31.5±27.0 | 37.4±45.6 | 0.270 |
| After fatigue | 36.9±25.9 | 43.7±42.4 | 0.238 |
| After recovery | 49.5±38.6 | 44.9±43.6 | 0.535 |
| Before fatigue | 1.8±1.9 | 3.7±5.8 | 0.097 |
| After fatigue | 1.7±1.2 | 3.3±4.6 | 0.115 |
| After recovery | 2.5±2.1 | 1.0±0.5 | 0.016 |
| Before fatigue | 47.7±19.7 | 38.6±21.4 | 0.083 |
| After fatigue | 47.0±21.7 | 39.5±21.6 | 0.039 |
| After recovery | 40.4±21.6 | 52.6±12.8 | 0.069 |
LF – low-frequency component; HF – high-frequency component. Data are presented as mean±SD.
Figure 1Changes of total trial counts (A) and total error counts (B) of advanced trail making tests after the recovery session. Data are presented as mean and SD. * p<0.05, significant difference between control and pellet stove conditions (paired t-test).
Figure 2Changes of low-frequency component (LF)/high-frequency component (HF) ratio (A) and %HF (B) after the recovery session. Data are presented as mean ±SD. ** p<0.01, * p<0.05, significant difference between control and pellet stove conditions (paired t-test).