PURPOSE: To report the short-term visual outcomes and complications of keratoprosthesis surgery as the primary penetrating corneal procedure for patients at high risk for conventional corneal transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 21 eyes of 19 patients who underwent either Boston keratoprosthesis type I or type II as the primary penetrating corneal procedure from February 2007 to March 2011. RESULTS: Nineteen type I (90.5%) and 2 type II (9.5%) Boston keratoprosthesis procedures were performed in 19 patients. Mean follow-up was 14.6 months (range, 6-36.3 mo). Primary indications for surgery included chemical or thermal injury, aniridia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 20/100 to light perception and was count fingers or worse in 20 eyes (95.2%). At last follow-up for all eyes, 15 eyes (71.4%) achieved BCVA≥20/200 and 4 eyes (19%) improved to BCVA≥20/50. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications include retroprosthetic membrane formation (47.6%), cystoid macular edema (33.3%), elevated intraocular pressure (23.8%), glaucoma progression (14.3%), and endophthalmitis (4.8%). The initial keratoprosthesis was retained in 19 eyes (90.5%). CONCLUSION: The Boston keratoprosthesis, based on early follow-up, is a good alternative as a primary penetrating corneal procedure in a select group of patients with very poor prognosis for penetrating keratoplasty. Although complications can occur and require close monitoring, visual acuity significantly improved in the majority of patients.
PURPOSE: To report the short-term visual outcomes and complications of keratoprosthesis surgery as the primary penetrating corneal procedure for patients at high risk for conventional corneal transplantation. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted of 21 eyes of 19 patients who underwent either Boston keratoprosthesis type I or type II as the primary penetrating corneal procedure from February 2007 to March 2011. RESULTS: Nineteen type I (90.5%) and 2 type II (9.5%) Boston keratoprosthesis procedures were performed in 19 patients. Mean follow-up was 14.6 months (range, 6-36.3 mo). Primary indications for surgery included chemical or thermal injury, aniridia, and Stevens-Johnson syndrome. Preoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 20/100 to light perception and was count fingers or worse in 20 eyes (95.2%). At last follow-up for all eyes, 15 eyes (71.4%) achieved BCVA≥20/200 and 4 eyes (19%) improved to BCVA≥20/50. No intraoperative complications occurred. Postoperative complications include retroprosthetic membrane formation (47.6%), cystoid macular edema (33.3%), elevated intraocular pressure (23.8%), glaucoma progression (14.3%), and endophthalmitis (4.8%). The initial keratoprosthesis was retained in 19 eyes (90.5%). CONCLUSION: The Boston keratoprosthesis, based on early follow-up, is a good alternative as a primary penetrating corneal procedure in a select group of patients with very poor prognosis for penetrating keratoplasty. Although complications can occur and require close monitoring, visual acuity significantly improved in the majority of patients.
Authors: Maria Fideliz de la Paz; Josef Stoiber; Valeria de Rezende Couto Nascimento; Juan Alvarez de Toledo; Orang Seyeddain; Wolfgang Hitzl; Günther Grabner; Rafael I Barraquer; Ralph Michael Journal: Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol Date: 2013-10-25 Impact factor: 3.117
Authors: Jennifer I Lim; Lindsay Machen; Andrea Arteaga; Faris I Karas; Robert Hyde; Dingcai Cao; Marcia Niec; Thasarat S Vajaranant; M Soledad Cortina Journal: Retina Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Alja Crnej; Masahiro Omoto; Thomas H Dohlman; John M Graney; Claes H Dohlman; Brigita Drnovsek-Olup; Reza Dana Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-05-15 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Mohsin H Ali; Mark S Dikopf; Anthony G Finder; Ahmad A Aref; Thasarat Vajaranant; Jose de la Cruz; Maria Soledad Cortina Journal: Cornea Date: 2018-05 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Kai B Kang; Faris I Karas; Ruju Rai; Joelle A Hallak; Joann J Kang; Jose de la Cruz; Maria S Cortina Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Katarzyna Krysik; Piotr Miklaszewski; Dariusz Dobrowolski; Anita Lyssek-Boroń; Beniamin O Grabarek; Edward Wylęgała Journal: Ophthalmol Ther Date: 2021-11-22