Literature DB >> 22365876

Novel educational approach for medical students: improved retention rates using interactive medical software compared with traditional lecture-based format.

Anuradha Subramanian1, Matthew Timberlake, Harsha Mittakanti, Michael Lara, Mary L Brandt.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mannequin and computer-based simulators are useful for the practice of patient management, physical procedures, and competency. However, they are ineffective in teaching clinical medicine. StepStone Interactive Medical Software (SS) is a web-based medical learning modality that provides the user with a highly focused set of evaluative and interventional tasks to treat memorable virtual patients in a visual case-based format.
OBJECTIVE: To determine whether the SS learning modality is superior to traditional lecture format in medical student learning and retention.
METHODS: After Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval was obtained and the consents were signed, 30 third-year medical students were assigned randomly to 2 groups of 15 students each: The control group received two 30-minute PowerPoint lectures (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, Washington) about torsades de pointes (TdP) and pulseless electrical activity (PEA), and the SS group was given 1 hour to review 2 SS cases teaching TdP and PEA. A preintervention test was given to assess their baseline knowledge. An immediate postintervention test was given to both groups. Twenty-two days later, a long-term retention test was administered. The results were analyzed using a Student t test for continuous variables.
RESULTS: The mean scores for the preintervention test in the control and SS groups were 44.9 ± 3% and 44.1 ± 2%, respectively (p = 0.41). The mean scores for the postintervention test in the control and SS groups were 61.7 ± 2% and 86.7 ± 2%, respectively (p < 0.001). Improvement from baseline knowledge was calculated, and the mean improvement was 16.8 ± 3% in the control group and 42.5 ± 2% in the SS group (p < 0.001). The long-term retention test revealed the mean scores of 55.8 ± 3% in the control group and 70.1 ± 3% in the SS group (p < 0.001). Long-term improvement from baseline knowledge was calculated and the control group improved by 10.9 ± 4%, whereas the SS group improved by 26 ± 3% (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSIONS: The SS learning modality demonstrated a significant improvement in student learning retention compared to traditional didactic lecture format. SS is an effective web-based medical education tool. Copyright Â
© 2012 Association of Program Directors in Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22365876     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2011.12.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Educ        ISSN: 1878-7452            Impact factor:   2.891


  15 in total

1.  An assessment of student experiences and learning based on a novel undergraduate e-learning resource.

Authors:  S Mehta; F Clarke; P S Fleming
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  E-learning in orthopedic surgery training: A systematic review.

Authors:  Sandip P Tarpada; Matthew T Morris; Denver A Burton
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2016-09-21

3.  Tracheotomy care simulation training program for inpatient providers.

Authors:  Ryan Alyson-Yao Tiu; Tanya Kim Meyer; Ross M Mayerhoff; Joel C Ray; Patricia A Kritek; Albert Lincoln Merati; Maya Guirish Sardesai
Journal:  Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol       Date:  2022-09-05

4.  Surviving the COVID - 19 Pandemic Resurgence: Not Easy but Achievable.

Authors:  Iakovos N Nomikos
Journal:  Hell Cheirourgike       Date:  2021-03-22

5.  Are pediatric critical care medicine fellowships teaching and evaluating communication and professionalism?

Authors:  David A Turner; Richard B Mink; K Jane Lee; Margaret K Winkler; Sara L Ross; Christoph P Hornik; Jennifer J Schuette; Katherine Mason; Stephanie A Storgion; Denise M Goodman
Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 3.624

6.  A pilot study: a teaching electronic medical record for educating and assessing residents in the care of patients.

Authors:  Joshua Smith; W Graham Carlos; Cynthia S Johnson; Blaine Takesue; Debra Litzelman
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2018-12

7.  [Digital teaching with, during and after COVID-19].

Authors:  Isabel Molwitz; Ahmed Othman; Andreas Brendlin; Saif Afat; Jörg Barkhausen; Sebastian D Reinartz
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 0.635

8.  Online eLearning for undergraduates in health professions: A systematic review of the impact on knowledge, skills, attitudes and satisfaction.

Authors:  Pradeep Paul George; Nikos Papachristou; José Marcano Belisario; Wei Wang; Petra A Wark; Ziva Cotic; Kristine Rasmussen; René Sluiter; Eva Riboli-Sasco; Lorainne Tudor Car; Eve Marie Musulanov; Joseph Antonio Molina; Bee Hoon Heng; Yanfeng Zhang; Erica Lynette Wheeler; Najeeb Al Shorbaji; Azeem Majeed; Josip Car
Journal:  J Glob Health       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 4.413

9.  Improved self- and external assessment of the clinical abilities of medical students through structured improvement measures in an internal medicine bedside course.

Authors:  S M Fünger; H Lesevic; S Rosner; I Ott; P Berberat; C Nikendei; C Sonne
Journal:  GMS J Med Educ       Date:  2016-08-15

10.  Does online learning work better than offline learning in undergraduate medical education? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Leisi Pei; Hongbin Wu
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2019-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.