Literature DB >> 22364816

Contraindications to progestin-only oral contraceptive pills among reproductive-aged women.

Kari White1, Joseph E Potter, Kristine Hopkins, Leticia Fernández, Jon Amastae, Daniel Grossman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Progestin-only oral contraceptive pills (POPs) have fewer contraindications to use compared to combined pills. However, the overall prevalence of contraindications to POPs among reproductive-aged women has not been assessed. STUDY
DESIGN: We collected information on contraindications to POPs in two studies: (1) the Self-Screening Study, a sample of 1267 reproductive-aged women in the general population in El Paso, TX, and (2) the Prospective Study of OC Users, a sample of current oral contraceptive (OC) users who obtained their pills in El Paso clinics (n=532) or over the counter (OTC) in Mexican pharmacies (n=514). In the Self-Screening Study, we also compared women's self-assessment of contraindications using a checklist to a clinician's evaluation.
RESULTS: Only 1.6% of women in the Self-Screening Study were identified as having at least one contraindication to POPs. The sensitivity of the checklist for identifying women with at least one contraindication was 75.0% [95% confidence interval (CI): 50.6%-90.4%], and the specificity was 99.4% (95% CI: 98.8%-99.7%). In total, 0.6% of women in the Prospective Study of OC Users reported having any contraindication to POPs. There were no significant differences between clinic and OTC users.
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of contraindications to POPs was very low in these samples. POPs may be the best choice for the first OTC oral contraceptive in the United States.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22364816      PMCID: PMC3368072          DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2012.01.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Contraception        ISSN: 0010-7824            Impact factor:   3.375


  17 in total

1.  A double-blind study comparing the contraceptive efficacy, acceptability and safety of two progestogen-only pills containing desogestrel 75 micrograms/day or levonorgestrel 30 micrograms/day. Collaborative Study Group on the Desogestrel-containing Progestogen-only Pill.

Authors: 
Journal:  Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.848

2.  Contraindications to oral contraceptive use among women in the United States, 1999-2001.

Authors:  Emily Shortridge; Kate Miller
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2007-03-26       Impact factor: 3.375

3.  Agreement between women's and providers' assessment of hormonal contraceptive risk factors.

Authors:  Solmaz Shotorbani; Leslie Miller; David K Blough; Jacqueline Gardner
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 3.375

Review 4.  Progestin-only pills for contraception.

Authors:  David A Grimes; Laureen M Lopez; Paul A O'Brien; Elizabeth G Raymond
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

5.  Clinic versus over-the-counter access to oral contraception: choices women make along the US-Mexico border.

Authors:  Joseph E Potter; Kari White; Kristine Hopkins; Jon Amastae; Daniel Grossman
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  Maintenance of ovulation inhibition with the 75-microg desogestrel-only contraceptive pill (Cerazette) after scheduled 12-h delays in tablet intake.

Authors:  Tjeerd Korver; Christine Klipping; Doris Heger-Mahn; Ingrid Duijkers; Gonnie van Osta; Thom Dieben
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.375

7.  U S. Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use, 2010.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2010-06-18

Review 8.  Considerations for the use of progestin-only contraceptives.

Authors:  Sarah Freeman; Lee P Shulman
Journal:  J Am Acad Nurse Pract       Date:  2010-02

9.  Accuracy of self-screening for contraindications to combined oral contraceptive use.

Authors:  Daniel Grossman; Leticia Fernandez; Kristine Hopkins; Jon Amastae; Sandra G Garcia; Joseph E Potter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Cardiovascular disease and use of oral and injectable progestogen-only contraceptives and combined injectable contraceptives. Results of an international, multicenter, case-control study. World Health Organization Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease and Steroid Hormone Contraception.

Authors: 
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 3.375

View more
  2 in total

1.  Computer-assisted provision of hormonal contraception in acute care settings.

Authors:  Eleanor B Schwarz; Elizabeth J Burch; Sara M Parisi; Kathleen P Tebb; Daniel Grossman; Ateev Mehrotra; Ralph Gonzales
Journal:  Contraception       Date:  2012-08-24       Impact factor: 3.375

2.  Assessing the Pregnancy Protective Impact of Scheduled Nonadherence to a Novel Progestin-Only Pill: Protocol for a Prospective, Multicenter, Randomized, Crossover Study.

Authors:  Alison Edelman; Agnes Hemon; Mitchell Creinin; Pascale Borensztein; Bruno Scherrer; Anna Glasier
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2021-06-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.