Literature DB >> 22362464

Thermodynamic stability explains the differential evolutionary dynamics of cytochrome b and COX I in mammals.

Juan Carlos Aledo1, Héctor Valverde, Manuel Ruíz-Camacho.   

Abstract

By using a combination of evolutionary and structural data from 231 species, we have addressed the relationship between evolution and structural features of cytochrome b and COX I, two mtDNA-encoded proteins. The interior of cytochrome b, in contrast to that of COX I, exhibits a remarkable tolerance to changes. The higher evolvability of cytochrome b contrasts with the lower rate of synonymous substitutions of its gene when compared to that of COX I, suggesting that the latter is subjected to a stronger purifying selection. We present evidences that the stability effect of mutations (ΔΔG) may be behind these differential behaviour.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22362464     DOI: 10.1007/s00239-012-9489-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Evol        ISSN: 0022-2844            Impact factor:   2.395


  37 in total

1.  Novel computer program for fast exact calculation of accessible and molecular surface areas and average surface curvature.

Authors:  Oleg V Tsodikov; M Thomas Record; Yuri V Sergeev
Journal:  J Comput Chem       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 3.376

2.  Predicting changes in the stability of proteins and protein complexes: a study of more than 1000 mutations.

Authors:  Raphael Guerois; Jens Erik Nielsen; Luis Serrano
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-07-05       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Modeling amino acid substitution patterns in orthologous and paralogous genes.

Authors:  Gavin C Conant; Günter P Wagner; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2006-07-26       Impact factor: 4.286

4.  The stability effects of protein mutations appear to be universally distributed.

Authors:  Nobuhiko Tokuriki; Francois Stricher; Joost Schymkowitz; Luis Serrano; Dan S Tawfik
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 5.469

5.  Solvent exposure imparts similar selective pressures across a range of yeast proteins.

Authors:  Gavin C Conant; Peter F Stadler
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Neutral evolution on mammalian protein surfaces.

Authors:  Gavin C Conant
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 11.639

7.  Structural determinants of protein evolution are context-sensitive at the residue level.

Authors:  Eric A Franzosa; Yu Xia
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-07-13       Impact factor: 16.240

8.  Unequal synonymous substitution rates within and between two protein-coding mitochondrial genes.

Authors:  J P Bielawski; J R Gold
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 16.240

9.  Correlates of substitution rate variation in mammalian protein-coding sequences.

Authors:  John J Welch; Olaf R P Bininda-Emonds; Lindell Bromham
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2008-02-19       Impact factor: 3.260

10.  Uncorrected nucleotide bias in mtDNA can mimic the effects of positive Darwinian selection.

Authors:  Mihai Albu; Xiang Jia Min; Donal Hickey; Brian Golding
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 16.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Conservative and compensatory evolution in oxidative phosphorylation complexes of angiosperms with highly divergent rates of mitochondrial genome evolution.

Authors:  Justin C Havird; Nicholas S Whitehill; Christopher D Snow; Daniel B Sloan
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.694

2.  Episodic evolution of coadapted sets of amino acid sites in mitochondrial proteins.

Authors:  Alexey D Neverov; Anfisa V Popova; Gennady G Fedonin; Evgeny A Cheremukhin; Galya V Klink; Georgii A Bazykin
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2021-01-25       Impact factor: 5.917

3.  Molecular variation of the cytochrome b DNA and protein sequences in Phytoseiulus macropilis and P. persimilis (Acari: Phytoseiidae) reflect population differentiation.

Authors:  Maria Cristina Vitelli Queiroz; Martial Douin; Mario Eidi Sato; Marie-Stéphane Tixier
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2021-07-29       Impact factor: 2.132

4.  Protein-protein interfaces from cytochrome c oxidase I evolve faster than nonbinding surfaces, yet negative selection is the driving force.

Authors:  Juan Carlos Aledo; Héctor Valverde; Manuel Ruíz-Camacho; Ian Morilla; Francisco Demetrio López
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 3.416

5.  Sulphur Atoms from Methionines Interacting with Aromatic Residues Are Less Prone to Oxidation.

Authors:  Juan C Aledo; Francisco R Cantón; Francisco J Veredas
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-11-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.