Literature DB >> 22361318

Effect of the duration of macular edema on clinical outcomes in retinal vein occlusion treated with dexamethasone intravitreal implant.

Wei-Shi Yeh1, Julia A Haller, Paolo Lanzetta, Baruch D Kuppermann, Tien Yin Wong, Paul Mitchell, Scott M Whitcup, Jonathan W Kowalski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the effect of duration of macular edema (ME) on clinical outcomes after treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg (Ozurdex; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, CA) in patients with ME following branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) or central retinal vein occlusion (CRVO).
DESIGN: Post hoc analysis of pooled data from 2 randomized, controlled trials. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with vision loss resulting from ME of 6 weeks' duration or more after BRVO or CRVO (n = 690).
METHODS: The relationship between ME duration at the time of first treatment and treatment outcomes was assessed using logistic regression. Other factors potentially associated with ME duration or patient outcomes were adjusted for in the analyses. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The proportion of patients achieving at least 15 letters improvement in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) or at least 200-μm or more reduction in central retinal thickness 6 or 12 months after the first treatment with dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg.
RESULTS: In the 6-month analysis, each 1-month increase in ME duration was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of achieving a BCVA improvement of 15 letters or more (odds ratio [OR], 0.88; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-0.94; P<0.001) or a CRT reduction of 200-μm or more (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.86-0.97; P<0.01) 6 months after treatment. In the 12-month analysis, increased ME duration was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of achieving BCVA improvement of 15 letters or more improvement in BCVA (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.76-0.95; P<0.01) 12 months after treatment; duration was not significantly associated with the likelihood of a CRT reduction of 200-μm or more at 12 months. In general, the effect of ME duration on outcomes was stronger and statistically significant in BRVO patients, but weaker and not statistically significant in CRVO patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with retinal vein occlusion, longer ME duration at the time of first treatment with the dexamethasone intravitreal implant 0.7 mg was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of achieving clinically meaningful improvements in vision or CRT 6 or 12 months after treatment. This suggests that prompt treatment for retinal vein occlusion, particularly BRVO, may be associated with improved clinical outcomes. FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S): Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.
Copyright © 2012 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22361318     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2011.12.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  34 in total

Review 1.  Central retinal vein occlusion: modifying current treatment protocols.

Authors:  M Ashraf; A A R Souka; R P Singh
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Steroid differentiation: the safety profile of various steroids on retinal cells in vitro and their implications for clinical use (an American Ophthalmological Society thesis).

Authors:  Baruch D Kuppermann; Leandro Cabral Zacharias; M Cristina Kenney
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2014-07

3.  Reply to a letter to the editor: Dexamethasone intravitreal implant in retinal vein occlusion: real-life data from a prospective, multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Nicole Eter; Andreas Mohr; Joachim Wachtlin; Nicolas Feltgen
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-13       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Anatomical and functional recurrence after dexamethasone intravitreal implants: a 6-month prospective study.

Authors:  V Fortoul; P Denis; L Kodjikian
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2015-03-20       Impact factor: 3.775

5.  Therapeutic potential of intravitreal pharmacotherapy in retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Marianne L Shahsuvaryan
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-12-18       Impact factor: 1.779

6.  Efficacy of intravitreal conbercept injection on short- and long-term macular edema in branch retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Jing-Yi Bai; Wen-Ying Wang; Zhi-Zhi Dou; Bo-Chao Geng; Xiao-Yan Xu; Yuan-Zhang Zhu; Shan-Yao Zhao; Min Liu; Shao-You Jia; Wen-Juan Luo
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 1.779

7.  Potential anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapies for central retinal vein occlusion.

Authors:  Marta S Figueroa; Inés Contreras
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Improved visual outcome with early treatment in macular edema secondary to retinal vein occlusions: 6-month results of a Korean RVO study.

Authors:  Young Hee Yoon; Ha Kyoung Kim; Hee Seong Yoon; Se Woong Kang; June-Gone Kim; Kyu Hyung Park; Young Joon Jo; Joo Yong Lee; Dong Hoon Lee
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Dexamethasone Intravitreal Implant for Early Treatment and Retreatment of Macular Edema Related to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: The Multicenter COBALT Study.

Authors:  Young Hee Yoon; Jong Woo Kim; Joo Yong Lee; In Taek Kim; Se Woong Kang; Hyeong Gon Yu; Hyoung Jun Koh; Sung Soo Kim; Dong-Jin Chang; Susan Simonyi
Journal:  Ophthalmologica       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.250

10.  Managing patients with retinal vein occlusions: is there any real step forward?

Authors:  S Natarajan
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.848

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.