Literature DB >> 22361248

Integrated morphologic and functional assessment of the aortic root after different tissue valve root replacement procedures.

Ryo Torii1, Ismail El-Hamamsy, Mohamed Donya, Sonya V Babu-Narayan, Michael Ibrahim, Philip J Kilner, Raad H Mohiaddin, Xiao Yun Xu, Magdi H Yacoub.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study was undertaken to explore aspects of the hemodynamic function of different biologic tissue aortic valve root replacements. We set out to image and display the spatiotemporal distributions of axially directed blood velocity through the aortic root.
METHODS: The flow velocities through a plane transecting the aortic root were measured by 2-dimensional cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance velocity mapping in 44 subjects: 29 patients who had undergone aortic root replacement approximately 10 years previously (13 autografts, 10 stentless xenografts, and 6 homografts) and 15 healthy control subjects. With cine as well as velocity images, aortic sinus dimensions, effective orifice area, and several velocity parameters were measured. Color-coded plots of velocity relative to the sinus cross sections and velocity-time plots were used to compare spatiotemporal distributions of velocity.
RESULTS: Peak flow velocity was similar between the autografts (102 ± 28.0 cm/s) and control valves (119 ± 20.0 cm/s) but was higher in xenografts (167 ± 36.0 cm/s) and homografts (206 ± 91.0 cm/s). These measurements showed an inverse relationship with the effective orifice area (7.27 ± 0.20, 4.24 ± 0.81, 3.37 ± 0.32, and 3.28 ± 0.87 cm(2), respectively). Autograft peak flow velocity showed no significant difference from control valve peak flow velocity, despite larger root dimensions (P < .001). The graphic displays provided further spatiotemporal information.
CONCLUSIONS: Peak velocities and spatiotemporal flow patterns depend on the type of valve substitute. In the parameters measured, autograft replacements differed least from normal aortic valves.
Copyright © 2012 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22361248     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2011.12.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  9 in total

1.  Aortic valve replacement in young and middle-aged adults: looking beyond the tree that hides the forest.

Authors:  Amine Mazine; Maral Ouzounian
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 2.  Current state of the art and future of myectomy.

Authors:  Magdi H Yacoub; Ahmed Afifi; Hesham Saad; Heba Aguib; Ahmed ElGuindy
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2017-07

3.  Blood flow characteristics in the ascending aorta after aortic valve replacement--a pilot study using 4D-flow MRI.

Authors:  Florian von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff; Ralf F Trauzeddel; Alex J Barker; Henriette Gruettner; Michael Markl; Jeanette Schulz-Menger
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 4.164

4.  In-vivo assessment of the morphology and hemodynamic functions of the BioValsalva™ composite valve-conduit graft using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and computational modelling technology.

Authors:  Emaddin Kidher; Zhuo Cheng; Omar A Jarral; Declan P O'Regan; Xiao Yun Xu; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Perioperative evaluation of regional aortic wall shear stress patterns in patients undergoing aortic valve and/or proximal thoracic aortic replacement.

Authors:  Emilie Bollache; Paul W M Fedak; Pim van Ooij; Ozair Rahman; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick M McCarthy; James C Carr; Alex Powell; Jeremy D Collins; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 5.209

6.  Commentary: The Ross procedure in a graft: A word of caution.

Authors:  Elbert Williams; Ismail El-Hamamsy
Journal:  JTCVS Tech       Date:  2021-09-24

Review 7.  Understanding Pulmonary Autograft Remodeling After the Ross Procedure: Stick to the Facts.

Authors:  Lucas Van Hoof; Peter Verbrugghe; Elizabeth A V Jones; Jay D Humphrey; Stefan Janssens; Nele Famaey; Filip Rega
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2022-02-09

Review 8.  Biomechanics of Pulmonary Autograft as Living Tissue: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-08

Review 9.  The living aortic valve: From molecules to function.

Authors:  Adrian H Chester; Ismail El-Hamamsy; Jonathan T Butcher; Najma Latif; Sergio Bertazzo; Magdi H Yacoub
Journal:  Glob Cardiol Sci Pract       Date:  2014-01-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.