Literature DB >> 22360676

A critical review of the development of face recognition: experience is less important than previously believed.

Elinor McKone1, Kate Crookes, Linda Jeffery, Daniel D Dilks.   

Abstract

Historically, it has been argued that face individuation develops very slowly, not reaching adult levels until adolescence, with experience being the driving force behind this protracted improvement. Here, we challenge this view based on extensive review of behavioural and neural findings. Results demonstrate qualitative presence of all key phenomena related to face individuation (encoding of novel faces, holistic processing effects, face-space effects, face-selective responses in neuroimaging) at the earliest ages tested, typically 3-5 years of age and in many cases even infancy. Results further argue for quantitative maturity by early childhood, based on an increasing number of behavioural studies that have avoided the common methodological problem of restriction of range, as well as event-related potential (ERP), but not functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies. We raise a new possibility that could account for the discrepant fMRI findings-namely, the use of adult-sized head coils on child-sized heads. We review genetic and innate contributions to face individuation (twin studies, neonates, visually deprived monkeys, critical periods, perceptual narrowing). We conclude that the role of experience in the development of the mechanisms of face identification has been overestimated. The emerging picture is that the mechanisms supporting face individuation are mature early, consistent with the social needs of children for reliable person identification in everyday life, and are also driven to an important extent by our evolutionary history.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22360676     DOI: 10.1080/02643294.2012.660138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol        ISSN: 0264-3294            Impact factor:   2.468


  53 in total

1.  Co-ordinated structural and functional covariance in the adolescent brain underlies face processing performance.

Authors:  Daniel Joel Shaw; Radek Mareček; Marie-Helene Grosbras; Gabriel Leonard; G Bruce Pike; Tomáš Paus
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-15       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Development of effective connectivity in the core network for face perception.

Authors:  Wei He; Marta I Garrido; Paul F Sowman; Jon Brock; Blake W Johnson
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 3.  Functional outcomes following lesions in visual cortex: Implications for plasticity of high-level vision.

Authors:  Tina T Liu; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 4.  Face processing in autism spectrum disorders: From brain regions to brain networks.

Authors:  Jason S Nomi; Lucina Q Uddin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Successful Reorganization of Category-Selective Visual Cortex following Occipito-temporal Lobectomy in Childhood.

Authors:  Tina T Liu; Adrian Nestor; Mark D Vida; John A Pyles; Christina Patterson; Ying Yang; Fan Nils Yang; Erez Freud; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 9.423

Review 6.  Marmosets: A Neuroscientific Model of Human Social Behavior.

Authors:  Cory T Miller; Winrich A Freiwald; David A Leopold; Jude F Mitchell; Afonso C Silva; Xiaoqin Wang
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 17.173

7.  A lack of experience-dependent plasticity after more than a decade of recovered sight.

Authors:  Elizabeth Huber; Jason M Webster; Alyssa A Brewer; Donald I A MacLeod; Brian A Wandell; Geoffrey M Boynton; Alex R Wade; Ione Fine
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2015-03-03

8.  The face inversion effect in infants is driven by high, and not low, spatial frequencies.

Authors:  Karen R Dobkins; Rachael Harms
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Depression severity is associated with impaired facial emotion processing in a large international sample.

Authors:  Lauren A Rutter; Eliza Passell; Luke Scheuer; Laura Germine
Journal:  J Affect Disord       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 4.839

10.  Children's neural response to contrast-negated faces is species specific.

Authors:  Benjamin Balas; Kate Stevenson
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2013-12-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.