| Literature DB >> 22358425 |
N M Isa1, S I Abdelwahab, S Mohan, A B Abdul, M A Sukari, M M E Taha, S Syam, P Narrima, S Ch Cheah, S Ahmad, M R Mustafa.
Abstract
The current in vitro study was designed to investigate the anti-inflammatory, cytotoxic and antioxidant activities of boesenbergin A (BA), a chalcone derivative of known structure isolated from Boesenbergia rotunda. Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29), non-small cell lung cancer (A549), prostate adenocarcinoma (PC3), and normal hepatic cells (WRL-68) were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of BA using the MTT assay. The antioxidant activity of BA was assessed by the ORAC assay and compared to quercetin as a standard reference antioxidant. ORAC results are reported as the equivalent concentration of Trolox that produces the same level of antioxidant activity as the sample tested at 20 µg/mL. The toxic effect of BA on different cell types, reported as IC50, yielded 20.22 ± 3.15, 10.69 ± 2.64, 20.31 ± 1.34, 94.10 ± 1.19, and 9.324 ± 0.24 µg/mL for A549, PC3, HepG2, HT-29, and WRL-68, respectively. BA displayed considerable antioxidant activity, when the results of ORAC assay were reported as Trolox equivalents. BA (20 µg/mL) and quercetin (5 µg/mL) were equivalent to a Trolox concentration of 11.91 ± 0.23 and 160.32 ± 2.75 µM, respectively. Moreover, the anti-inflammatory activity of BA was significant at 12.5 to 50 µM and without any significant cytotoxicity for the murine macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 at 50 µM. The significant biological activities observed in this study indicated that BA may be one of the agents responsible for the reported biological activities of B. rotunda crude extract.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2012 PMID: 22358425 PMCID: PMC3854301 DOI: 10.1590/s0100-879x2012007500022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Med Biol Res ISSN: 0100-879X Impact factor: 2.590
Figure 1.Structure of boesenbergin A {(±)-(E)-1-[7′-hydroxy-5′-methoxy-2′-methyl-2′-(4″-methylpent-3″-enyl)-2′H-chromen-8′- yl]-3-phenylprop-2-enone} (top) and quercetin {2-(3,4-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,5,7-trihydroxy-4H-chromen-4-one} (bottom).
Figure 2.Chromatogram of boesenbergin A at 220 nm. Analysis was performed using a Shimadzu UFLC system equipped with a PDA UV detector and Ion Trap TOF mass spectrometer. Column: Waters Xbridge 50 x 2.1 mm 2.5 µM. Mobile phase: H2O (0.1% formic acid):MeCN (0.1% formic acid). Flow rate: 0.50 mL/min. Column temperature: 40°C. Gradient: 10-100% MeCN over 7 min.
Figure 3.Dose-response curves of the cytotoxicity of boesenbergin A. Each value represents the mean ± SD. Human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), colon adenocarcinoma (HT-29), non-small cell lung cancer (A549), prostate adenocarcinoma (PC3), and normal hepatic cells (WRL-68) were used to evaluate the cytotoxicity of boesenbergin A by the MTT assay.
Toxicity of boesenbergin A (BA) on different cell types.
| Cell line | Cancer of origin | IC50 ± SD (µg/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| BA | Paclitaxel | ||
| A549 | Non-small cell lung cancer | 20.22 ± 3.15b | 5.81 ± 1.03 |
| PC3 | Prostate adenocarcinoma | 10.69 ± 2.64a | 0.08 ± 0.03 |
| HepG2 | Human hepatocellular carcinoma | 20.31 ± 1.34b | 1.18 ± 0.24 |
| HT-29 | Human colon adenocarcinoma | 94.10 ± 1.19c | 0.06 ± 0.02 |
| WRL-68 | Normal hepatic cells | 9.32 ± 0.24a | 0.10 ± 0.05 |
IC50 values were obtained with the MTT assay. Data are reported as means ± SD for measurements in triplicate. Means followed by different superscript letters differed significantly. Data were analyzed statistically by one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (P < 0.05).
Oxygen radical absorbance capacity (ORAC) assay.
| Sample | Net AUC | Equivalent concentration of Trolox at 20 µg/mL (µM) |
|---|---|---|
| Boesenbergin A | 2.17 | 11.91 ± 0.23 |
| Quercetin | 21.98 | 160.32 ± 2.75 |
The net AUC was calculated by subtracting the blank AUC from the AUC of each sample, the standards, and the positive control. Final ORAC values are reported as the equivalent concentration of Trolox that produces the same level of antioxidant activity as the samples at 20 µg/mL. AUC = area under curve.
P < 0.05, quercetin compared to boesenbergin A (t-test).
Figure 4.Effect of boesenbergin A (BA) on nitric oxide (NO) inhibition in RAW cells. Cells were pretreated for 24 h with the indicated doses of BA and stimulated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and interferon-γ (IFN-γ) to activate NO production. L-NAME (Sigma Aldrich, USA) was used as a positive control at a concentration of 250 µM. Data are reported as the average of three experiments. Differences between induced and treatment were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and the Tukey post hoc test (*P < 0.05).