F Petrelli1, S Barni. 1. Medical Oncology Unit, Oncology department, Azienda Ospedaliera Treviglio Caravaggio, Piazzale Ospedale 1, 24047 Treviglio, BG, Italy. faupe@libero.it
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Cetuximab (C) and panitumumab (P) increase response rate and survival in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess their effect on overall response rate (ORR), the rate of radical resection (R0) and survival in patients with liver-limited initially unresectable mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCTs comparing first-line chemotherapy plus or minus C or P and reporting data in patients with KRAS wild-type, unresectable liver-limited mCRC. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Meta-analysis of hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) was also performed. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 484 KRAS wild-type patients were included. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of C or P significantly increased the ORR (RR 1.67, p = 0.0001), the R0 resection rate from 11% to 18% (RR 1.59, p = 0.04) and PFS (HR 0.68, p = 0.002), but not OS (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of C and P increased the R0 resection rate by 60% and reduced the risk of progression by 32% in patients with mCRC and unresectable liver-limited disease. This combination represents one of the preferred choices as conversion therapy in KRAS wild-type patients with unresectable liver metastases.
BACKGROUND:Cetuximab (C) and panitumumab (P) increase response rate and survival in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We performed a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) to assess their effect on overall response rate (ORR), the rate of radical resection (R0) and survival in patients with liver-limited initially unresectable mCRC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for RCTs comparing first-line chemotherapy plus or minus C or P and reporting data in patients with KRAS wild-type, unresectable liver-limited mCRC. Relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence interval were calculated. Meta-analysis of hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free and overall survival (PFS and OS) was also performed. RESULTS: Four RCTs involving 484 KRAS wild-type patients were included. Compared to chemotherapy alone, the addition of C or P significantly increased the ORR (RR 1.67, p = 0.0001), the R0 resection rate from 11% to 18% (RR 1.59, p = 0.04) and PFS (HR 0.68, p = 0.002), but not OS (p = 0.42). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of C and P increased the R0 resection rate by 60% and reduced the risk of progression by 32% in patients with mCRC and unresectable liver-limited disease. This combination represents one of the preferred choices as conversion therapy in KRAS wild-type patients with unresectable liver metastases.
Authors: Jean-Yves Douillard; Salvatore Siena; James Cassidy; Josep Tabernero; Ronald Burkes; Mario Barugel; Yves Humblet; György Bodoky; David Cunningham; Jacek Jassem; Fernando Rivera; Ilona Kocákova; Paul Ruff; Maria Błasińska-Morawiec; Martin Šmakal; Jean-Luc Canon; Mark Rother; Kelly S Oliner; Michael Wolf; Jennifer Gansert Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: C Bokemeyer; I Bondarenko; J T Hartmann; F de Braud; G Schuch; A Zubel; I Celik; M Schlichting; P Koralewski Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Eric Van Cutsem; Claus-Henning Köhne; István Láng; Gunnar Folprecht; Marek P Nowacki; Stefano Cascinu; Igor Shchepotin; Joan Maurel; David Cunningham; Sabine Tejpar; Michael Schlichting; Angela Zubel; Ilhan Celik; Philippe Rougier; Fortunato Ciardiello Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-18 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Herbert Hurwitz; Louis Fehrenbacher; William Novotny; Thomas Cartwright; John Hainsworth; William Heim; Jordan Berlin; Ari Baron; Susan Griffing; Eric Holmgren; Napoleone Ferrara; Gwen Fyfe; Beth Rogers; Robert Ross; Fairooz Kabbinavar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2004-06-03 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Timothy S Maughan; Richard A Adams; Christopher G Smith; Angela M Meade; Matthew T Seymour; Richard H Wilson; Shelley Idziaszczyk; Rebecca Harris; David Fisher; Sarah L Kenny; Edward Kay; Jenna K Mitchell; Ayman Madi; Bharat Jasani; Michelle D James; John Bridgewater; M John Kennedy; Bart Claes; Diether Lambrechts; Richard Kaplan; Jeremy P Cheadle Journal: Lancet Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak Journal: J Mol Diagn Date: 2017-02-06 Impact factor: 5.568
Authors: Konstantinos Papadimitriou; Christian Rolfo; Elien Dewaele; Mick Van De Wiel; Jan Van den Brande; Sevilay Altintas; Manon Huizing; Pol Specenier; Marc Peeters Journal: Curr Treat Options Oncol Date: 2015-04
Authors: Antonia R Sepulveda; Stanley R Hamilton; Carmen J Allegra; Wayne Grody; Allison M Cushman-Vokoun; William K Funkhouser; Scott E Kopetz; Christopher Lieu; Noralane M Lindor; Bruce D Minsky; Federico A Monzon; Daniel J Sargent; Veena M Singh; Joseph Willis; Jennifer Clark; Carol Colasacco; R Bryan Rumble; Robyn Temple-Smolkin; Christina B Ventura; Jan A Nowak Journal: Am J Clin Pathol Date: 2017-02-03 Impact factor: 2.493
Authors: C Giessen; L Fischer von Weikersthal; R P Laubender; S Stintzing; D P Modest; A Schalhorn; C Schulz; V Heinemann Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2013-08-20 Impact factor: 7.640
Authors: Carlo Barone; Carmine Pinto; Nicola Normanno; Lorenzo Capussotti; Francesco Cognetti; Alfredo Falcone; Lorenzo Mantovani Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-01-20 Impact factor: 3.240