Literature DB >> 17470860

Phase III trial of infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) compared with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) as first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer: the Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest.

Alfredo Falcone1, Sergio Ricci, Isa Brunetti, Elisabetta Pfanner, Giacomo Allegrini, Cecilia Barbara, Lucio Crinò, Giovanni Benedetti, Walter Evangelista, Laura Fanchini, Enrico Cortesi, Vincenzo Picone, Stefano Vitello, Silvana Chiara, Cristina Granetto, Gianfranco Porcile, Luisa Fioretto, Cinzia Orlandini, Michele Andreuccetti, Gianluca Masi.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The Gruppo Oncologico Nord Ovest (GONO) conducted a phase III study comparing fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI [irinotecan 165 mg/m2 day 1, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2 day 1, fluorouracil 3,200 mg/m2 48-hour continuous infusion starting on day 1, every 2 weeks]) with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI).
METHODS: Selection criteria included unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer, age 18 to 75 years, and no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease. The primary end point was response rate (RR).
RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were randomly assigned. An increase of grade 2 to 3 peripheral neurotoxicity (0% v 19%; P < .001), and grade 3 to 4 neutropenia (28% v 50%; P < .001) were observed in the FOLFOXIRI arm. The incidence of febrile neutropenia (3% v 5%) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (12% v 20%) were not significantly different. Responses, as assessed by investigators, were, for FOLFIRI and FOLFOXIRI, respectively, complete, 6% and 8%; and partial, 35% and 58%, (RR, 41% v 66%; P = .0002). RR confirmed by an external panel was 34% versus 60% (P < .0001). The R0 secondary resection rate of metastases was greater in the FOLFOXIRI arm (6% v 15%; P = .033, among all 244 patients; and 12% v 36%; P = .017 among patients with liver metastases only). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were both significantly improved in the FOLFOXIRI arm (median PFS, 6.9 v 9.8 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.63; P = .0006; median OS, 16.7 v 22.6 months; HR, 0.70; P = .032).
CONCLUSION: The FOLFOXIRI regimen improves RR, PFS, and OS compared with FOLFIRI, with an increased, but manageable, toxicity in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer with favorable prognostic characteristics. Further studies of FOLFOXIRI in combination with targeted agents and in the neoadjuvant setting are warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17470860     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.0928

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  328 in total

1.  Resectability and outcome with anti-EGFR agents in patients with KRAS wild-type colorectal liver-limited metastases: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  F Petrelli; S Barni
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-23       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 2.  Evolvement of the treatment paradigm for metastatic colon cancer. From chemotherapy to targeted therapy.

Authors:  Santiago Aparo; Sanjay Goel
Journal:  Crit Rev Oncol Hematol       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 6.312

3.  Optimal use of current chemotherapy in multimodality therapy for advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Inoue; Junichiro Hiro; Yuji Toiyama; Koji Tanaka; Yasuhiko Mohri; Masato Kusunoki
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2011-12-01       Impact factor: 2.967

4.  FOLFIRINOX-induced reversible dysarthria: A case report and review of previous cases.

Authors:  Ayumu Matsuoka; Osamu Maeda; Megumi Inada-Inoue; Eizaburo Ohno; Yoshiki Hirooka; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsutomu Fujii; Masato Nagino; Hidemi Goto; Yuichi Ando
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Targeting precision medicine toxicity: recent developments.

Authors:  Gordon Mallarkey; Arduino A Mangoni
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2015-02

6.  Targeted therapies in colorectal cancer: surgical considerations.

Authors:  Carrie Luu; Amanda K Arrington; Hans F Schoellhammer; Gagandeep Singh; Joseph Kim
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Combining chemotherapy and targeted therapies in metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  J Rodriguez; R Zarate; E Bandres; A Viudez; A Chopitea; J García-Foncillas; I Gil-Bazo
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 8.  The role of targeted therapy in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Marwan Fakih
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2009-02-24

9.  Phase II trial of infusional fluorouracil, irinotecan, and bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer: efficacy and circulating angiogenic biomarkers associated with therapeutic resistance.

Authors:  Scott Kopetz; Paulo M Hoff; Jeffrey S Morris; Robert A Wolff; Cathy Eng; Katrina Y Glover; Rosie Adinin; Michael J Overman; Vincete Valero; Sijin Wen; Christopher Lieu; Shaoyu Yan; Hai T Tran; Lee M Ellis; James L Abbruzzese; John V Heymach
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-12-14       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  [Metastases of colorectal carcinoma].

Authors:  S Clasen; H Rempp; P L Pereira
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 0.635

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.