Literature DB >> 22357935

It is optimal to be optimistic about survival.

John M McNamara1, Pete C Trimmer, Alasdair I Houston.   

Abstract

We investigate the optimal behaviour of an organism that is unable to obtain a reliable estimate of its mortality risk. In this case, natural selection will shape behaviour to be approximately optimal given the probability distribution of mortality risks in possible environments that the organism and its ancestors encountered. The mean of this distribution is the average mortality risk experienced by a randomly selected member of the species. We show that if an organism does not know the exact mortality risk, it should act as if the risk is less than the mean risk. This can be viewed as being optimistic. We argue that this effect is likely to be general.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22357935      PMCID: PMC3391451          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  7 in total

1.  Assessing predation risk: optimal behaviour and rules of thumb.

Authors:  Nicky J Welton; John M McNamara; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Theor Popul Biol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.570

Review 2.  Is optimism optimal? Functional causes of apparent behavioural biases.

Authors:  Alasdair I Houston; Pete C Trimmer; Tim W Fawcett; Andrew D Higginson; James A R Marshall; John M McNamara
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2011-11-12       Impact factor: 1.777

3.  The value of fat reserves and the tradeoff between starvation and predation.

Authors:  J M McNamara; A I Houston
Journal:  Acta Biotheor       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.774

4.  Environmental variability can select for optimism or pessimism.

Authors:  John M McNamara; Pete C Trimmer; Anders Eriksson; James A R Marshall; Alasdair I Houston
Journal:  Ecol Lett       Date:  2010-11-11       Impact factor: 9.492

5.  Ecological consequences of the trade-off between growth and mortality rates mediated by foraging activity.

Authors:  E E Werner; B R Anholt
Journal:  Am Nat       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Predation risk as a cost of reproduction.

Authors:  C Magnhagen
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 17.712

Review 7.  Decision-making under uncertainty: biases and Bayesians.

Authors:  Pete C Trimmer; Alasdair I Houston; James A R Marshall; Mike T Mendl; Elizabeth S Paul; John M McNamara
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 3.084

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Enrico Sorato; Josefina Zidar; Laura Garnham; Alastair Wilson; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.