Literature DB >> 22357407

Psychological aspects of active surveillance.

Roderick C N van den Bergh1, Ida J Korfage, Chris H Bangma.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Active surveillance is emerging as a serious alternative to radical therapy for low-risk prostate cancer. In a situation in which the difference in effects on disease morbidity and mortality of different treatment options for these malignancies is likely to be small, the quality of life and psychological aspects may be decisive in treatment choice. RECENT
FINDINGS: The following three are the main issues being covered in the literature on psychological aspects of active surveillance. First, the process of consultation with the physician and treatment choice in men diagnosed with low-risk prostate cancer. Second, the effect of active surveillance on physical domains and resulting anxiety and distress, and on quality of life in general. And third, the possible supportive and educational interventions for patients on active surveillance. Observations are scarce and derived from nonrandomized studies with a limited follow-up after diagnosis.
SUMMARY: At the moment of treatment choice, fear of disease progression is the main reason to reject active surveillance. Active surveillance may spare physical domains and does not cause much anxiety or distress on short term in men who choose this strategy. Once men opt for active surveillance, only a minority of them switch to radical treatment due to psychological reasons. Supportive and educational interventions should be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22357407     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328351dcb1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  20 in total

Review 1.  Decision making and cancer.

Authors:  Valerie F Reyna; Wendy L Nelson; Paul K Han; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  2015 Feb-Mar

2.  Toward ethically responsible choice architecture in prostate cancer treatment decision-making.

Authors:  J S Blumenthal-Barby; Denise Lee; Robert J Volk
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 508.702

3.  Selecting Active Surveillance: Decision Making Factors for Men with a Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Richard M Hoffman; Tania Lobo; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst D Leimpeter; David Aaronson; David F Penson; Kathryn Taylor
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 2.583

4.  Gain-loss framing and patients' decisions: a linguistic examination of information framing in physician-patient conversations.

Authors:  Ilona Fridman; Angela Fagerlin; Karen A Scherr; Laura D Scherer; Hanna Huffstetler; Peter A Ubel
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2020-07-28

5.  Active surveillance for low-risk localized prostate cancer: what do men and their partners think?

Authors:  Arun Mallapareddi; Julie Ruterbusch; Elyse Reamer; Susan Eggly; Jinping Xu
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.267

Review 6.  Guidance on patient consultation. Current evidence for prostate-specific antigen screening in healthy men and treatment options for men with proven localised prostate cancer.

Authors:  Giovannalberto Pini; Justin Collins; Pirus Ghadjar; Peter Wiklund
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Cognitive and Affective Representations of Active Surveillance as a Treatment Option for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kathleen D Lyons; Hsin H Li; Emily M Mader; Telisa M Stewart; Christopher P Morley; Margaret K Formica; Scott D Perrapato; John D Seigne; Elias S Hyams; Brian H Irwin; Terry Mosher; Mark T Hegel
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2016-07-07

8.  Treatment Preferences for Active Surveillance versus Active Treatment among Men with Low-Risk Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Kathryn L Taylor; Richard M Hoffman; Kimberly M Davis; George Luta; Amethyst Leimpeter; Tania Lobo; Scott P Kelly; Jun Shan; David Aaronson; Catherine A Tomko; Amy J Starosta; Charlotte J Hagerman; Stephen K Van Den Eeden
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.254

9.  Comparative Analysis of the Growth Pattern of Thyroid Cancer in Young Patients Screened by Ultrasonography in Japan After a Nuclear Accident: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Authors:  Sanae Midorikawa; Akira Ohtsuru; Michio Murakami; Hideto Takahashi; Satoru Suzuki; Takashi Matsuzuka; Hiroki Shimura; Tetsuya Ohira; Shin-Ichi Suzuki; Seiji Yasumura; Shunichi Yamashita; Hitoshi Ohto; Koichi Tanigawa; Kenji Kamiya
Journal:  JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 6.223

Review 10.  Cognitive and Psychological Impacts of Different Treatment Options for Prostate Cancer: A Critical Analysis.

Authors:  Konstantina G Yiannopoulou; Aikaterini I Anastasiou; Konstantinos Kontoangelos; Charalambos Papageorgiou; Ioannis P Anastasiou
Journal:  Curr Urol       Date:  2020-12-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.