J-Y Blay1, D Pérol, A Le Cesne. 1. Department of Medical Oncology, Centre Léon-Bérard, Lyon, France. jean-yves.blay@lyon.unicancer.fr
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Imatinib is the standard of care for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). DESIGN: This article reviews recent data on the impact of imatinib treatment interruption and subsequent rechallenge in patients with advanced GIST. RESULTS: The randomized BFR14 trial showed that (i) interruption of imatinib after 1, 3, or 5 years of treatment in patients with nonprogressive GIST was associated with a high risk of progression even in patients with a complete response; (ii) rechallenge with imatinib restored tumor control in most patients, but the tumor response seldom reached that before treatment interruption; (iii) patients receiving continuous imatinib had a high rate of prolonged tumor control, which increased with longer imatinib treatment. The findings in the metastatic setting have important implications regarding the duration of adjuvant imatinib in GIST. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of imatinib in responding patients with advanced GIST is associated with a high risk of progression and is therefore not recommended. Although rechallenge is a strategy for treating patients who relapse after stopping imatinib, suboptimal tumor response indicates that continuous kinase suppression is necessary to achieve the best clinical outcome. Three-year adjuvant imatinib is recommended for patients with resected 'high-risk' GIST; however, a longer duration may provide additional benefits.
BACKGROUND:Imatinib is the standard of care for patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). DESIGN: This article reviews recent data on the impact of imatinib treatment interruption and subsequent rechallenge in patients with advanced GIST. RESULTS: The randomized BFR14 trial showed that (i) interruption of imatinib after 1, 3, or 5 years of treatment in patients with nonprogressive GIST was associated with a high risk of progression even in patients with a complete response; (ii) rechallenge with imatinib restored tumor control in most patients, but the tumor response seldom reached that before treatment interruption; (iii) patients receiving continuous imatinib had a high rate of prolonged tumor control, which increased with longer imatinib treatment. The findings in the metastatic setting have important implications regarding the duration of adjuvant imatinib in GIST. CONCLUSIONS: Discontinuation of imatinib in responding patients with advanced GIST is associated with a high risk of progression and is therefore not recommended. Although rechallenge is a strategy for treating patients who relapse after stopping imatinib, suboptimal tumor response indicates that continuous kinase suppression is necessary to achieve the best clinical outcome. Three-year adjuvant imatinib is recommended for patients with resected 'high-risk' GIST; however, a longer duration may provide additional benefits.
Authors: Peter Reichardt; Yoon-Koo Kang; Piotr Rutkowski; Jochen Schuette; Lee S Rosen; Beatrice Seddon; Suayib Yalcin; Hans Gelderblom; Charles C Williams; Elena Fumagalli; Guido Biasco; Herbert I Hurwitz; Pamela E Kaiser; Kolette Fly; Ewa Matczak; Liang Chen; Maria José Lechuga; George D Demetri Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Robert G Maki; Jean-Yves Blay; George D Demetri; Jonathan A Fletcher; Heikki Joensuu; Javier Martín-Broto; Toshirou Nishida; Peter Reichardt; Patrick Schöffski; Jonathan C Trent Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-06-12
Authors: Hans Gelderblom; Robin L Jones; Suzanne George; Claudia Valverde Morales; Charlotte Benson; Daniel J Renouf; Toshihiko Doi; Axel Le Cesne; Michael Leahy; Sabine Hertle; Paola Aimone; Ulrike Brandt; Patrick Schӧffski Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2020-03-09 Impact factor: 7.640