Literature DB >> 22356936

Single-trial analysis of auditory evoked potentials improves separation of normal and schizophrenia subjects.

Darshan Iyer1, Nash N Boutros, George Zouridakis.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we employed iterative independent component analysis of single-trial auditory evoked responses to identify features of the P50 and N100 components that provide maximum separation between normal controls and schizophrenia subjects and compared the results against classical ensemble averaging.
METHOD: We analyzed data from 13 schizophrenia and 20 normal control subjects. Responses were obtained in a paired-stimulus paradigm, in which an auditory stimulus S(1) is followed by an identical S(2). The amplitude and latency of the P50 and N100 components in response to the S(1) and S(2) stimuli were measured in each single trial and used as features to classify the responses into two groups. Several methods were used for classification, while their performance was quantified in a 10-fold stratified cross-validation approach.
RESULTS: We found that normal controls tended to respond earlier and their individual responses had significantly higher amplitude (p<0.01) and significantly less latency variability (p<0.01) compared to schizophrenia patients. The S(1) latency was the most significant discriminatory feature (p<0.01) followed by S(2) latency (p<0.01). The S(2) amplitude, though relatively larger in normal subjects (p<0.05), was the least discriminatory feature. Classification based on single-trial analysis yielded 100% accuracy, while the classical ensemble averaging yielded only a maximum of 76% accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that single-trial analysis can accurately separate schizophrenia patients from normal controls and suggest that inter-trial variability plays a significant role in information processing in the human brain. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed technique may have a significant impact as a clinical tool in the quest for identifying physiological markers of schizophrenia.
Copyright © 2012 International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356936     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2011.12.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 1388-2457            Impact factor:   3.708


  4 in total

1.  Cognitive and neuroplasticity mechanisms by which congenital or early blindness may confer a protective effect against schizophrenia.

Authors:  Steven M Silverstein; Yushi Wang; Brian P Keane
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2013-01-21

2.  Machine Learning Techniques for the Diagnosis of Schizophrenia Based on Event-Related Potentials.

Authors:  Elsa Santos Febles; Marlis Ontivero Ortega; Michell Valdés Sosa; Hichem Sahli
Journal:  Front Neuroinform       Date:  2022-07-08       Impact factor: 3.739

Review 3.  Schizophrenia: A Survey of Artificial Intelligence Techniques Applied to Detection and Classification.

Authors:  Joel Weijia Lai; Candice Ke En Ang; U Rajendra Acharya; Kang Hao Cheong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  The Dissociation between Polarity, Semantic Orientation, and Emotional Tone as an Early Indicator of Cognitive Impairment.

Authors:  Susana A Arias Tapia; Rafael Martínez-Tomás; Héctor F Gómez; Víctor Hernández Del Salto; Javier Sánchez Guerrero; J A Mocha-Bonilla; José Barbosa Corbacho; Azizudin Khan; Veronica Chicaiza Redin
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-09-14       Impact factor: 2.380

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.