OBJECTIVE: In this study, we employed iterative independent component analysis of single-trial auditory evoked responses to identify features of the P50 and N100 components that provide maximum separation between normal controls and schizophrenia subjects and compared the results against classical ensemble averaging. METHOD: We analyzed data from 13 schizophrenia and 20 normal control subjects. Responses were obtained in a paired-stimulus paradigm, in which an auditory stimulus S(1) is followed by an identical S(2). The amplitude and latency of the P50 and N100 components in response to the S(1) and S(2) stimuli were measured in each single trial and used as features to classify the responses into two groups. Several methods were used for classification, while their performance was quantified in a 10-fold stratified cross-validation approach. RESULTS: We found that normal controls tended to respond earlier and their individual responses had significantly higher amplitude (p<0.01) and significantly less latency variability (p<0.01) compared to schizophrenia patients. The S(1) latency was the most significant discriminatory feature (p<0.01) followed by S(2) latency (p<0.01). The S(2) amplitude, though relatively larger in normal subjects (p<0.05), was the least discriminatory feature. Classification based on single-trial analysis yielded 100% accuracy, while the classical ensemble averaging yielded only a maximum of 76% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that single-trial analysis can accurately separate schizophrenia patients from normal controls and suggest that inter-trial variability plays a significant role in information processing in the human brain. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed technique may have a significant impact as a clinical tool in the quest for identifying physiological markers of schizophrenia.
OBJECTIVE: In this study, we employed iterative independent component analysis of single-trial auditory evoked responses to identify features of the P50 and N100 components that provide maximum separation between normal controls and schizophrenia subjects and compared the results against classical ensemble averaging. METHOD: We analyzed data from 13 schizophrenia and 20 normal control subjects. Responses were obtained in a paired-stimulus paradigm, in which an auditory stimulus S(1) is followed by an identical S(2). The amplitude and latency of the P50 and N100 components in response to the S(1) and S(2) stimuli were measured in each single trial and used as features to classify the responses into two groups. Several methods were used for classification, while their performance was quantified in a 10-fold stratified cross-validation approach. RESULTS: We found that normal controls tended to respond earlier and their individual responses had significantly higher amplitude (p<0.01) and significantly less latency variability (p<0.01) compared to schizophreniapatients. The S(1) latency was the most significant discriminatory feature (p<0.01) followed by S(2) latency (p<0.01). The S(2) amplitude, though relatively larger in normal subjects (p<0.05), was the least discriminatory feature. Classification based on single-trial analysis yielded 100% accuracy, while the classical ensemble averaging yielded only a maximum of 76% accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that single-trial analysis can accurately separate schizophreniapatients from normal controls and suggest that inter-trial variability plays a significant role in information processing in the human brain. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed technique may have a significant impact as a clinical tool in the quest for identifying physiological markers of schizophrenia.
Authors: Joel Weijia Lai; Candice Ke En Ang; U Rajendra Acharya; Kang Hao Cheong Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-06-05 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Susana A Arias Tapia; Rafael Martínez-Tomás; Héctor F Gómez; Víctor Hernández Del Salto; Javier Sánchez Guerrero; J A Mocha-Bonilla; José Barbosa Corbacho; Azizudin Khan; Veronica Chicaiza Redin Journal: Front Comput Neurosci Date: 2016-09-14 Impact factor: 2.380