Literature DB >> 22356796

Effect of early diagnosis and treatment with percutaneous lead extraction on survival in patients with cardiac device infections.

Federico Viganego1, Susan O'Donoghue, Zayd Eldadah, Manish H Shah, Mohit Rastogi, Jay A Mazel, Edward V Platia.   

Abstract

Cardiac device infections (CDIs) represent a serious complication after the implantation of pacemakers and defibrillators. In addition to antimicrobials, complete hardware removal, mostly with percutaneous lead extraction (PLE), is necessary to limit recurrences. However, CDI diagnosis is often difficult and is sometimes delayed, and scarce data exist on how the timing of PLE may affect clinical outcomes. In this study, the in-hospital outcomes of 52 consecutive patients with CDIs who underwent PLE were retrospectively analyze. Co-morbidities such as diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency, and end-stage renal disease were highly prevalent in the study cohort. Patients were divided into group A (bacteremia or device endocarditis) and group B (localized pocket infection). In-hospital mortality was 29% in group A and 5% in group B (p = 0.02) and was due mostly to sepsis. Hospital stays were shorter in group B patients (5.7 vs 21.7 days, p <0.001). Presentation with hypotension was more commonly observed in group A patients and was associated with higher in-hospital mortality, whereas pocket findings correlated with better survival. Postoperative courses after PLE were uneventful in most patients, and no fatal complications were observed. PLE was performed significantly earlier in group B patients (hospitalization day 1.3 vs 7.6, p <0.001). PLE performed within 3 hospitalization days was associated with lower in-hospital mortality (p = 0.01). In conclusion, PLE performed within 3 days from admission is associated with shorter hospitalization and better survival. A timely diagnosis is crucial, particularly in the absence of local findings, because early treatment with PLE is likely to prevent the catastrophic outcomes of unrelenting CDIs.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22356796     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.01.360

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  18 in total

1.  The Diagnosis and Treatment of Pacemaker-Associated Infection.

Authors:  Michael Döring; Sergio Richter; Gerhard Hindricks
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2018-06-29       Impact factor: 5.594

2.  A case of defibrillator-associated infective endocarditis due to Campylobacter fetus.

Authors:  A Sękowska; T Fabiszak; A Mikucka; M Andrzejewska; E Kruszyńska; E Gospodarek; J Klawe
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 2.099

3.  Differences in laser lead extraction of infected vs. non-infected leads.

Authors:  Simon Pecha; Liesa Castro; Julia Vogler; Matthias Linder; Nils Gosau; Stephan Willems; Hermann Reichenspurner; Samer Hakmi
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2018-04-05       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Management of Cardiac Electronic Device Infections: Challenges and Outcomes.

Authors:  Rikke Esberg Kirkfeldt; Jens Brock Johansen; Jens Cosedis Nielsen
Journal:  Arrhythm Electrophysiol Rev       Date:  2016

Review 5.  Complications in Device Therapy: Spectrum, Prevalence, and Management.

Authors:  J Llewellyn; D Garner; A Rao
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2022-08-06

Review 6.  State-of-the-art narrative review: multimodality imaging in electrophysiology and cardiac device therapies.

Authors:  Balint Laczay; Divyang Patel; Richard Grimm; Bo Xu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

7.  Role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in patients with an implanted cardiac device: a prospective study.

Authors:  Maddalena Graziosi; Cristina Nanni; Massimiliano Lorenzini; Igor Diemberger; Rachele Bonfiglioli; Ferdinando Pasquale; Matteo Ziacchi; Mauro Biffi; Cristian Martignani; Michele Bartoletti; Fabio Tumietto; Giuseppe Boriani; Pier Luigi Viale; Stefano Fanti; Claudio Rapezzi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 9.236

8.  Snare sheath versus evolution sheath in transvenous lead extraction.

Authors:  Jihua Kong; Yilun Tian; Fei Guo; Feng Ze; Jiangbo Duan; Long Wang; Xuebin Li; Jihong Guo
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

9.  Experience of cardiac implantable electronic device lead removal from a South African tertiary referral centre.

Authors:  Philasande Mkoko; Nicholus Xolani Mdakane; Glenda Govender; Jacques Scherman; Ashley Chin
Journal:  Cardiovasc J Afr       Date:  2021-04-19       Impact factor: 1.167

10.  Clinical Profile and Outcome of Patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device-Related Infection.

Authors:  Alessandra de Souza Maciel; Rose Mary Ferreira Lisboa da Silva
Journal:  Arq Bras Cardiol       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.