PURPOSE: The appropriate selection of patients for early clinical trials presents a major challenge. Previous analyses focusing on this problem were limited by small size and by interpractice heterogeneity. This study aims to define prognostic factors to guide risk-benefit assessments by using a large patient database from multiple phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 2,182 eligible patients treated in phase I trials between 2005 and 2007 in 14 European institutions. We derived and validated independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality by using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality was 16.5% with a drug-related death rate of 0.4%. Trial discontinuation within 3 weeks occurred in 14% of patients primarily because of disease progression. Eight different prognostic variables for 90-day mortality were validated: performance status (PS), albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, number of metastatic sites, clinical tumor growth rate, lymphocytes, and WBC. Two different models of prognostic scores for 90-day mortality were generated by using these factors, including or excluding PS; both achieved specificities of more than 85% and sensitivities of approximately 50% when using a score cutoff of 5 or higher. These models were not superior to the previously published Royal Marsden Hospital score in their ability to predict 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Patient selection using any of these prognostic scores will reduce non-drug-related 90-day mortality among patients enrolled in phase I trials by 50%. However, this can be achieved only by an overall reduction in recruitment to phase I studies of 20%, more than half of whom would in fact have survived beyond 90 days.
PURPOSE: The appropriate selection of patients for early clinical trials presents a major challenge. Previous analyses focusing on this problem were limited by small size and by interpractice heterogeneity. This study aims to define prognostic factors to guide risk-benefit assessments by using a large patient database from multiple phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were collected from 2,182 eligible patients treated in phase I trials between 2005 and 2007 in 14 European institutions. We derived and validated independent prognostic factors for 90-day mortality by using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: The 90-day mortality was 16.5% with a drug-related death rate of 0.4%. Trial discontinuation within 3 weeks occurred in 14% of patients primarily because of disease progression. Eight different prognostic variables for 90-day mortality were validated: performance status (PS), albumin, lactate dehydrogenase, alkaline phosphatase, number of metastatic sites, clinical tumor growth rate, lymphocytes, and WBC. Two different models of prognostic scores for 90-day mortality were generated by using these factors, including or excluding PS; both achieved specificities of more than 85% and sensitivities of approximately 50% when using a score cutoff of 5 or higher. These models were not superior to the previously published Royal Marsden Hospital score in their ability to predict 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION: Patient selection using any of these prognostic scores will reduce non-drug-related 90-day mortality among patients enrolled in phase I trials by 50%. However, this can be achieved only by an overall reduction in recruitment to phase I studies of 20%, more than half of whom would in fact have survived beyond 90 days.
Authors: David M Hyman; Anne A Eaton; Mrinal M Gounder; Gary L Smith; Erika G Pamer; Martee L Hensley; David R Spriggs; Percy Ivy; Alexia Iasonos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-01-13 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Fernando Carceller; Francisco Bautista; Irene Jiménez; Raquel Hladun-Álvaro; Cécile Giraud; Luca Bergamaschi; Madhumita Dandapani; Isabelle Aerts; François Doz; Didier Frappaz; Michela Casanova; Bruce Morland; Darren R Hargrave; Gilles Vassal; Andrew D J Pearson; Birgit Geoerger; Lucas Moreno; Lynley V Marshall Journal: J Neurooncol Date: 2017-12-13 Impact factor: 4.130
Authors: Jean-Marie Michot; Lina Benajiba; Laura Faivre; Capucine Baldini; Lelia Haddag; Clement Bonnet; Christophe Massard; Frederic Bigot; Camille Bigenwald; Benjamin Verret; Zoé A P Thomas; Andrea Varga; Anas Gazzah; Antoine Hollebecque; David Ghez; Julien Lazarovici; Rastilav Balheda; Aurore Jeanson; Sophie Postel-Vinay; Alina Danu; Jean-Charles Soria; Xavier Paoletti; Vincent Ribrag Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-06-09 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Christos Fountzilas; Selena Stuart; Brian Hernandez; Elizabeth Bowhay-Carnes; Joel Michalek; John Sarantopoulos; Anand Karnad; Sukeshi Patel; Steven Weitman; Devalingam Mahalingam Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2017-01-19 Impact factor: 3.850
Authors: Winson Y Cheung; Lindsay A Renfro; David Kerr; Aimery de Gramont; Leonard B Saltz; Axel Grothey; Steven R Alberts; Thierry Andre; Katherine A Guthrie; Roberto Labianca; Guido Francini; Jean-Francois Seitz; Chris O'Callaghan; Chris Twelves; Eric Van Cutsem; Daniel G Haller; Greg Yothers; Daniel J Sargent Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-02-08 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Diane A J van der Biessen; Merlijn A Cranendonk; Gaia Schiavon; Bronno van der Holt; Erik A C Wiemer; Ferry A L M Eskens; Jaap Verweij; Maja J A de Jonge; Ron H J Mathijssen Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-02-21
Authors: Mrinal M Gounder; Lakshmi Nayak; Solmaz Sahebjam; Alona Muzikansky; Armando J Sanchez; Serena Desideri; Xiaobu Ye; S Percy Ivy; L Burt Nabors; Michael Prados; Stuart Grossman; Lisa M DeAngelis; Patrick Y Wen Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-08-17 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Sophie Cousin; A Hollebecque; S Koscielny; O Mir; A Varga; V E Baracos; J C Soria; S Antoun Journal: Invest New Drugs Date: 2013-12-17 Impact factor: 3.850