Literature DB >> 22355049

Adherence to stage-specific treatment guidelines for patients with colon cancer.

Ryaz Chagpar1, Yan Xing, Yi-Ju Chiang, Barry W Feig, George J Chang, Y Nancy You, Janice N Cormier.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Adherence to evidence-based treatment guidelines has been proposed as a measure of cancer care quality. We sought to determine rates of and factors associated with adherence to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) treatment guidelines for colon cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients within the National Cancer Data Base treated for colon adenocarcinoma (2003 to 2007) were identified. Adherence to stage-specific NCCN guidelines was determined based on disease stage. Hierarchical regression analyses were performed to identify factors predictive of adherence, overtreatment, and undertreatment.
RESULTS: A total of 173,243 patients were included in the final cohort, 123,953 (71%) of whom were treated according to NCCN guidelines. Patients with stage I disease were more likely to receive guideline-based treatment (96%) than patients with stage II (low risk, 66%; high risk, 36%), III (71%), or IV (73%) disease (P < .001). Adherence to consensus-based guidelines increased over time. Factors associated with adherence across all stages included age, Charlson-Deyo comorbidity index score, later year of diagnosis, and insurance status. Among patients with high-risk stage II or stage III disease, older patients with pre-existing comorbidities and patients with lower socioeconomic status were less likely to be offered adjuvant chemotherapy. Among patients with stage I and II disease, young, healthy patients were more likely to be recommended chemotherapy, in discordance with NCCN guidelines.
CONCLUSION: Significant variation exists in the treatment of colon cancer, particularly in treatment of high-risk stage II and stage III disease. The impact of nonadherence to guidelines on patient outcomes needs to be further elucidated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22355049      PMCID: PMC3341110          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2011.39.6937

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  39 in total

1.  Public reporting and pay for performance in hospital quality improvement.

Authors:  Peter K Lindenauer; Denise Remus; Sheila Roman; Michael B Rothberg; Evan M Benjamin; Allen Ma; Dale W Bratzler
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-01-26       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Medicare nonpayment, hospital falls, and unintended consequences.

Authors:  Sharon K Inouye; Cynthia J Brown; Mary E Tinetti
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Adherence to surgical care improvement project measures and the association with postoperative infections.

Authors:  Jonah J Stulberg; Conor P Delaney; Duncan V Neuhauser; David C Aron; Pingfu Fu; Siran M Koroukian
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2010-06-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Level of scientific evidence underlying recommendations arising from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines.

Authors:  Thejaswi K Poonacha; Ronald S Go
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-13       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 5.  Ensuring quality cancer care by the use of clinical practice guidelines and critical pathways.

Authors:  T J Smith; B E Hillner
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Assessing the initiation and completion of adjuvant chemotherapy in a large nationwide and population-based cohort of elderly patients with stage-III colon cancer.

Authors:  Chung-Yuan Hu; George L Delclos; Wenyaw Chan; Xianglin L Du
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 3.064

7.  Long-term survival results of surgery alone versus surgery plus 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin for stage II and stage III colon cancer: pooled analysis of NSABP C-01 through C-05. A baseline from which to compare modern adjuvant trials.

Authors:  Neal W Wilkinson; Greg Yothers; Samia Lopa; Joseph P Costantino; Nicholas J Petrelli; Norman Wolmark
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 5.344

8.  The national cancer data base: past, present, and future.

Authors:  David P Winchester; Andrew K Stewart; Jerri Linn Phillips; Elizabeth E Ward
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2009-10-22       Impact factor: 5.344

Review 9.  Optimal pathologic staging: defining stage II disease.

Authors:  Carolyn C Compton
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  The National Cancer Data Base: a powerful initiative to improve cancer care in the United States.

Authors:  Karl Y Bilimoria; Andrew K Stewart; David P Winchester; Clifford Y Ko
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 5.344

View more
  54 in total

1.  Variation in hospital treatment patterns for metastatic colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Scott E Regenbogen; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 6.860

2.  The effect of care setting in the delivery of high-value colon cancer care.

Authors:  Christine M Veenstra; Andrew J Epstein; Kaijun Liao; Arden M Morris; Craig E Pollack; Katrina A Armstrong
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Outcomes Among Minority Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer in a Safety-net Health Care System.

Authors:  Kelsey Lau-Min; Preeti Prakash; Eunji Jo; Aaron P Thrift; Susan Hilsenbeck; Benjamin L Musher
Journal:  Clin Colorectal Cancer       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 4.481

4.  Disparities in receipt of radiotherapy and survival by age, sex, and race among patients with non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anus.

Authors:  Doug M Baughman; Binay K Shah
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2016-12

5.  Evidence Underlying Recommendations and Payments from Industry to Authors of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines.

Authors:  Xu Liu; Ling-Long Tang; Yan-Ping Mao; Qing Liu; Ying Sun; Lei Chen; Jin-Ching Lin; Jun Ma
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-11-20

6.  Evaluation of determinants for age disparities in the survival improvement of colon cancer: results from a cohort of more than 486,000 patients in the United States.

Authors:  Fa Chen; Fei Wang; Christina E Bailey; Harvey J Murff; Jordan D Berlin; Xiao-Ou Shu; Wei Zheng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 6.166

7.  Adherence to treatment guidelines and survival for older patients with stage II or III colon cancer in Texas from 2001 through 2011.

Authors:  Hui Zhao; Ning Zhang; Vivian Ho; Minming Ding; Weiguo He; Jiangong Niu; Ming Yang; Xianglin L Du; Daria Zorzi; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Sharon H Giordano
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Surgical Referral for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Population-Based Survey.

Authors:  Robert W Krell; Bradley N Reames; Samantha Hendren; Timothy L Frankel; Timothy M Pawlik; Mathew Chung; David Kwon; Sandra L Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  An audit of referral and treatment patterns of high-risk prostate cancer patients in Alberta.

Authors:  Majed Alghamdi; Amandeep Taggar; Derek Tilley; Marc Kerba; Xanthoula Kostaras; Geoffrey Gotto; Michael Sia
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.862

10.  Association between adherence to National Comprehensive Cancer Network treatment guidelines and improved survival in patients with colon cancer.

Authors:  Genevieve M Boland; George J Chang; Alex B Haynes; Yi-Ju Chiang; Ryaz Chagpar; Yan Xing; Chung-Yuan Hu; Barry W Feig; Y Nancy You; Janice N Cormier
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.