Teresa Deshields1, Brad Zebrack, Vicki Kennedy. 1. Siteman Cancer Center at Barnes-Jewish Hospital and Washington University, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. tld2593@bjc.org
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the APOS commissioned a survey of its members and attendees of the annual meetings in 2008 and 2009. The goal of the survey was to assess the scope of psychosocial support services for cancer patients in the USA. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three individuals (27% response rate) completed the survey, which included questions assessing the extent to which respondents' institutions provided informational and psychosocial support services and conducted screening for psychosocial distress. RESULTS: Respondents were primarily psychologists, although oncologists, nurses, social workers, and others were represented, as well. A broad array of informational and support services were endorsed as being provided to cancer patients, both at no charge or for a fee. Respondents identified social workers as the professionals most often providing psychosocial services to cancer patients. Respondents also indicated that most psychosocial services have not been tailored to fit a culturally diverse population. Furthermore, most of the organizations represented in the survey do not routinely screen cancer patients for psychosocial distress. CONCLUSIONS: A broad range of psychosocial services are provided in cancer treatment settings; however, despite National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Institute of Medicine recommendations, routine screening for distress is not offered in a majority of cancer care organizations. Despite the racial, ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity of the US population, most organizations have not adapted their educational materials nor their psychosocial services to meet the needs of a diverse patient population.
OBJECTIVE: In 2009, the APOS commissioned a survey of its members and attendees of the annual meetings in 2008 and 2009. The goal of the survey was to assess the scope of psychosocial support services for cancerpatients in the USA. METHODS: Two hundred thirty-three individuals (27% response rate) completed the survey, which included questions assessing the extent to which respondents' institutions provided informational and psychosocial support services and conducted screening for psychosocial distress. RESULTS: Respondents were primarily psychologists, although oncologists, nurses, social workers, and others were represented, as well. A broad array of informational and support services were endorsed as being provided to cancerpatients, both at no charge or for a fee. Respondents identified social workers as the professionals most often providing psychosocial services to cancerpatients. Respondents also indicated that most psychosocial services have not been tailored to fit a culturally diverse population. Furthermore, most of the organizations represented in the survey do not routinely screen cancerpatients for psychosocial distress. CONCLUSIONS: A broad range of psychosocial services are provided in cancer treatment settings; however, despite National Comprehensive Cancer Network and Institute of Medicine recommendations, routine screening for distress is not offered in a majority of cancer care organizations. Despite the racial, ethnic, cultural, and linguistic diversity of the US population, most organizations have not adapted their educational materials nor their psychosocial services to meet the needs of a diverse patient population.
Authors: Maureen P Davey; Brianna Bilkins; Guy Diamond; Alliric I Willis; Edith P Mitchell; Adam Davey; Faith M Young Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2016-09 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Xuesong Han; Chun Chieh Lin; Chunyu Li; Janet S de Moor; Juan L Rodriguez; Erin E Kent; Laura P Forsythe Journal: Cancer Date: 2014-10-23 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Paul B Jacobsen; Ji-Hyun Lee; William Fulp; Erin M Siegel; David Shibata; Christine Laronga; Jhanelle Gray; Tawee Tanvetyanon; Fred Schreiber; Richard Brown; Richard Levine; Thomas Cartwright; Guillermo Abesada-Terk; George Kim; Carlos Alemany; Douglas Faig; Philip Sharp; Merry-Jennifer Markham; Mokenge Malafa Journal: J Oncol Pract Date: 2014-10-28 Impact factor: 3.840
Authors: Matthew R LeBlanc; Ashley Leak Bryant; Thomas W LeBlanc; Qing Yang; Emily Sellars; Cristiana Costa Chase; Sophia K Smith Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2022-03-09 Impact factor: 3.359
Authors: Kelly M Trevino; Charlotte Healy; Peter Martin; Beverly Canin; Karl Pillemer; Jo Anne Sirey; M Cary Reid Journal: J Geriatr Oncol Date: 2018-09 Impact factor: 3.599
Authors: Eida M Castro; Julio C Jiménez; Gwendolyn Quinn; Myra García; Yesenia Colón; Axel Ramos; Thomas Brandon; Vani Simmons; Clement Gwede; Susan Vadaparampil; Cruz María Nazario Journal: Support Care Cancer Date: 2014-09-24 Impact factor: 3.603
Authors: William F Pirl; Joseph A Greer; Sharla Wells-Di Gregorio; Teresa Deshields; Scott Irwin; Karen Fasciano; Lori Wiener; Tiffany Courtnage; Lynne S Padgett; Jesse R Fann Journal: Psychooncology Date: 2020-05-26 Impact factor: 3.955