Literature DB >> 22353246

Bayesian models with dominance effects for genomic evaluation of quantitative traits.

Robin Wellmann1, Jörn Bennewitz.   

Abstract

Genomic selection refers to the use of dense, genome-wide markers for the prediction of breeding values (BV) and subsequent selection of breeding individuals. It has become a standard tool in livestock and plant breeding for accelerating genetic gain. The core of genomic selection is the prediction of a large number of marker effects from a limited number of observations. Various Bayesian methods that successfully cope with this challenge are known. Until now, the main research emphasis has been on additive genetic effects. Dominance coefficients of quantitative trait loci (QTLs), however, can also be large, even if dominance variance and inbreeding depression are relatively small. Considering dominance might contribute to the accuracy of genomic selection and serve as a guide for choosing mating pairs with good combining abilities. A general hierarchical Bayesian model for genomic selection that can realistically account for dominance is introduced. Several submodels are proposed and compared with respect to their ability to predict genomic BV, dominance deviations and genotypic values (GV) by stochastic simulation. These submodels differ in the way the dependency between additive and dominance effects is modelled. Depending on the marker panel, the inclusion of dominance effects increased the accuracy of GV by about 17% and the accuracy of genomic BV by 2% in the offspring. Furthermore, it slowed down the decrease of the accuracies in subsequent generations. It was possible to obtain accurate estimates of GV, which enables mate selection programmes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22353246     DOI: 10.1017/S0016672312000018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  23 in total

1.  On the additive and dominant variance and covariance of individuals within the genomic selection scope.

Authors:  Zulma G Vitezica; Luis Varona; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-10-11       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Priors in whole-genome regression: the bayesian alphabet returns.

Authors:  Daniel Gianola
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.

Authors:  Tao Xiang; Ole Fredslund Christensen; Zulma Gladis Vitezica; Andres Legarra
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-05-09       Impact factor: 4.562

4.  Evaluation of nonadditive effects in yearling weight of tropical beef cattle.

Authors:  Fernanda S S Raidan; Laercio R Porto-Neto; Yutao Li; Sigrid A Lehnert; Zulma G Vitezica; Antonio Reverter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Modeling copy number variation in the genomic prediction of maize hybrids.

Authors:  Danilo Hottis Lyra; Giovanni Galli; Filipe Couto Alves; Ítalo Stefanine Correia Granato; Miriam Suzane Vidotti; Massaine Bandeira E Sousa; Júlia Silva Morosini; José Crossa; Roberto Fritsche-Neto
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.699

6.  Maximizing crossbred performance through purebred genomic selection.

Authors:  Hadi Esfandyari; Anders C Sørensen; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-03-14       Impact factor: 4.297

7.  Predicting heterosis for egg production traits in crossbred offspring of individual White Leghorn sires using genome-wide SNP data.

Authors:  Esinam N Amuzu-Aweh; Henk Bovenhuis; Dirk-Jan de Koning; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.297

8.  A crossbred reference population can improve the response to genomic selection for crossbred performance.

Authors:  Hadi Esfandyari; Anders Christian Sørensen; Piter Bijma
Journal:  Genet Sel Evol       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 4.297

9.  A genome-wide association study reveals dominance effects on number of teats in pigs.

Authors:  Marcos S Lopes; John W M Bastiaansen; Barbara Harlizius; Egbert F Knol; Henk Bovenhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Ridge, Lasso and Bayesian additive-dominance genomic models.

Authors:  Camila Ferreira Azevedo; Marcos Deon Vilela de Resende; Fabyano Fonseca E Silva; José Marcelo Soriano Viana; Magno Sávio Ferreira Valente; Márcio Fernando Ribeiro Resende; Patricio Muñoz
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.797

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.