Literature DB >> 2235288

Vernier acuity with opposite-contrast stimuli.

R P O'Shea1, D E Mitchell.   

Abstract

Vernier acuity has usually been tested with stimuli of the same contrast polarity (SC). This traditional vernier acuity was compared to that obtained with stimuli of opposite-contrast (OC) in which one target was brighter than the background and the other was darker. For both bar and dot targets vernier acuity with OC stimuli was about half as good as with SC stimuli. There were large individual differences in the size of the disadvantage with OC stimuli, although thresholds remained within the hyperacuity range. There were also individually-differing biases to see a dark vernier stimulus on one or the other side of a bright stimulus. Differences between OC and SC vernier acuities persisted over a wide range of interstimulus spacings, widths, and contrasts. At extremes of these spatial manipulations acuities became similar, but only because SC acuities were degraded to the level of OC acuities. Subjects showed little improvement in OC vernier acuity, even after 50,000 trials. It is concluded that finest judgements of spatial position arise in a level of the visual system at which light and dark stimuli are treated independently.

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2235288     DOI: 10.1068/p190207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  6 in total

1.  Luminance and chromatic contributions to a hyperacuity task: isolation by contrast polarity and target separation.

Authors:  Hao Sun; Bonnie Cooper; Barry B Lee
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-01-27       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The functional asymmetry of ON and OFF channels in the perception of contrast.

Authors:  Yaoguang Jiang; Gopathy Purushothaman; Vivien A Casagrande
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Transverse chromatic offsets with pupil displacements in the human eye: sources of variability and methods for real-time correction.

Authors:  Alexandra E Boehm; Claudio M Privitera; Brian P Schmidt; Austin Roorda
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Broad attention uncovers benefits of stimulus uniformity in visual crowding.

Authors:  Koen Rummens; Bilge Sayim
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Contrast polarity differences reduce crowding but do not benefit reading performance in peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; J Stephen Mansfield
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Precision of position signals for letters.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung; Gordon E Legge
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-05-19       Impact factor: 1.886

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.