Literature DB >> 22352378

Degradation products from consumer nanocomposites: a case study on quantum dot lighting.

Jingyu Liu1, John Katahara, Guanglai Li, Seth Coe-Sullivan, Robert H Hurt.   

Abstract

Most nanomaterials enter the natural environment as nanoenabled products, which are typically composites with primary nanoparticles bound on substrates or embedded in liquid or solid matrices. The environmental risks associated with these products are expected to differ from those associated with the as-produced particles. This article presents a case study on the end-of-life emission of a commercial prototype polymer/quantum-dot (QD) composite used in solid-state lighting for homes. We report the extent of cadmium release upon exposure to a series of environmental and biological simulant fluids, and track the loss of QD-characteristic fluorescence as a marker for chemical damage to the CdSe/ZnS nanoparticles. Measured cadmium releases after 30-day exposure range from 0.007 to 1.2 mg/g of polymer, and the higher values arise for low-pH simulants containing nitric or gastric acid. Centrifugal ultrafiltration and ICP was used to distinguish soluble cadmium from particulate forms. The leachate is found to contain soluble metals with no evidence of free QDs or QD-containing polymeric debris. The absence of free nanoparticles suggests that this product does not raise nanotechnology-specific environmental issues associated with degradation and leaching, but is more usefully regarded as a conventional chemical product that is a potential source of small amounts of soluble cadmium.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22352378      PMCID: PMC3362202          DOI: 10.1021/es204430f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Sci Technol        ISSN: 0013-936X            Impact factor:   9.028


  24 in total

1.  Characterization of molecularly imprinted polymers with the Langmuir-Freundlich isotherm.

Authors:  R J Umpleby; S C Baxter; Y Chen; R N Shah; K D Shimizu
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2001-10-01       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  The potential environmental impact of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Vicki L Colvin
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 3.  Nanomaterials in the construction industry: a review of their applications and environmental health and safety considerations.

Authors:  Jaesang Lee; Shaily Mahendra; Pedro J J Alvarez
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2010-07-27       Impact factor: 15.881

4.  120 years of nanosilver history: implications for policy makers.

Authors:  Bernd Nowack; Harald F Krug; Murray Height
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-01-10       Impact factor: 9.028

5.  Assessing the risks of manufactured nanomaterials.

Authors:  Mark R Wiesner; Greg V Lowry; Pedro Alvarez; Dianysios Dionysiou; Pratim Biswas
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2006-07-15       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  CdSe nanocrystals as hydroperoxide scavengers: a new approach to highly sensitive quantification of lipid hydroperoxides.

Authors:  Kai Xin Hay; Viduranga Yashasvi Waisundara; Yun Zong; Ming-Yong Han; Dejian Huang
Journal:  Small       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 13.281

7.  Long-term exposure to CdTe quantum dots causes functional impairments in live cells.

Authors:  Sung Ju Cho; Dusica Maysinger; Manasi Jain; Beate Röder; Steffen Hackbarth; Françoise M Winnik
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 3.882

8.  Model-based assessment for human inhalation exposure risk to airborne nano/fine titanium dioxide particles.

Authors:  Chung-Min Liao; Yu-Hui Chiang; Chia-Pin Chio
Journal:  Sci Total Environ       Date:  2008-10-26       Impact factor: 7.963

9.  Quantum dot nanotoxicity assessment using the zebrafish embryo.

Authors:  Tisha C King-Heiden; Paige N Wiecinski; Andrew N Mangham; Kevin M Metz; Dorothy Nesbit; Joel A Pedersen; Robert J Hamers; Warren Heideman; Richard E Peterson
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2009-03-01       Impact factor: 9.028

Review 10.  A toxicologic review of quantum dots: toxicity depends on physicochemical and environmental factors.

Authors:  Ron Hardman
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  5 in total

1.  Assessing the Environmental Effects Related to Quantum Dot Structure, Function, Synthesis and Exposure.

Authors:  Marissa Giroux; Zahra Zahra; Omobayo A Salawu; Robert M Burgess; Kay T Ho; Adeyemi S Adeleye
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2022-03-01

2.  Environmental release of core-shell semiconductor nanocrystals from free-standing polymer nanocomposite films.

Authors:  Karthik V Pillai; Patrick J Gray; Chun-Chieh Tien; Reiner Bleher; Li-Piin Sung; Timothy V Duncan
Journal:  Environ Sci Nano       Date:  2016-05-10

3.  CdSe/ZnS Core-Shell-Type Quantum Dot Nanoparticles Disrupt the Cellular Homeostasis in Cellular Blood-Brain Barrier Models.

Authors:  Katarzyna Dominika Kania; Waldemar Wagner; Łukasz Pułaski
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  Semiconductor Quantum Dots as Target Analytes: Properties, Surface Chemistry and Detection.

Authors:  Jesús Sanmartín-Matalobos; Pilar Bermejo-Barrera; Manuel Aboal-Somoza; Matilde Fondo; Ana M García-Deibe; Julio Corredoira-Vázquez; Yeneva Alves-Iglesias
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-21       Impact factor: 5.719

Review 5.  Dependence of Nanoparticle Toxicity on Their Physical and Chemical Properties.

Authors:  Alyona Sukhanova; Svetlana Bozrova; Pavel Sokolov; Mikhail Berestovoy; Alexander Karaulov; Igor Nabiev
Journal:  Nanoscale Res Lett       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 4.703

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.