Literature DB >> 18952258

Model-based assessment for human inhalation exposure risk to airborne nano/fine titanium dioxide particles.

Chung-Min Liao1, Yu-Hui Chiang, Chia-Pin Chio.   

Abstract

This paper proposed a model-based approach to assess inhalation risk levels to manufacturing workers in titanium dioxide (TiO2) production factories. The risk level-based analytical schemes were present for investigations of job-related airborne nano/fine TiO2 dust exposures. A Hill model was used to reconstruct dose-response function based on data from rats exposed by chronic inhalation to poorly soluble fine and nanosized particles. A physiologically based lung model was used to predict surface area-based TiO2 burdens in alveolar surface and interstitial granuloma, respectively. The exposure effect was characterized by polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN) elevation effect on lung surface and lung tumor proportion on interstitium. Combining laboratory, field, and modeling results, two major findings were proposed to the current epidemiological studies: (i) the estimated median effective surface area-based TiO2 lung burden (EC50) for PMN elevation effect is 0.11 m2 g(-1) lung (95% CI: 0.04-0.2) and EC50 for lung tumor proportion is 1.15 m2 g(-1) lung (95% CI: 0.65-1.89) and (ii) the estimates of risk curves are the pivotal results for public policy. The results demonstrate that packers in US factories have approximately 85.77 fold (95% CI: 63.84-94.33) of standard PMN counts of 10(6), whereas 86.97 fold (95% CI: 66.72-94.54) for surface treatment workers in EU factories at risk of 0.5. The lung had approximately 45% (95% CI: 15%-54%) tumor proportion for packers in US factories, whereas 48.19% (95% CI: 20-53.79%) for surface treatment workers in EU factories at risk of 0.5. The findings point out that dry/wet treatment and ore handlers in US and maintenance mechanics in EU factories were unlikely to pose substantial lung cancer risks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18952258     DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2008.09.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sci Total Environ        ISSN: 0048-9697            Impact factor:   7.963


  6 in total

1.  Inappropriate exposure data and misleading calculations invalidate the estimates of health risk for airborne titanium dioxide and carbon black nanoparticle exposures in the workplace.

Authors:  Peter Morfeld; Robert J McCunney; Len Levy; Ishrat S Chaudhuri
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2011-12-15       Impact factor: 4.223

2.  Translational considerations for cancer nanomedicine.

Authors:  Stephan T Stern; Jennifer B Hall; Lee L Yu; Laura J Wood; Giulio F Paciotti; Lawrence Tamarkin; Stephen E Long; Scott E McNeil
Journal:  J Control Release       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 9.776

3.  Degradation products from consumer nanocomposites: a case study on quantum dot lighting.

Authors:  Jingyu Liu; John Katahara; Guanglai Li; Seth Coe-Sullivan; Robert H Hurt
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 9.028

4.  Range-finding risk assessment of inhalation exposure to nanodiamonds in a laboratory environment.

Authors:  Antti J Koivisto; Jaana E Palomäki; Anna-Kaisa Viitanen; Kirsi M Siivola; Ismo K Koponen; Mingzhou Yu; Tomi S Kanerva; Hannu Norppa; Harri T Alenius; Tareq Hussein; Kai M Savolainen; Kaarle J Hämeri
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Assessing human exposure risk and lung disease burden posed by airborne silver nanoparticles emitted by consumer spray products.

Authors:  Ying-Fei Yang; Wei-Ming Wang; Chi-Yun Chen; Tien-Hsuan Lu; Chung-Min Liao
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2019-03-05

6.  Particle length-dependent titanium dioxide nanomaterials toxicity and bioactivity.

Authors:  Raymond F Hamilton; Nianqiang Wu; Dale Porter; Mary Buford; Michael Wolfarth; Andrij Holian
Journal:  Part Fibre Toxicol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 9.400

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.