Literature DB >> 22351701

Parents and medical professionals: conflict, cooperation, and best interests.

Rob Heywood1.   

Abstract

Abstract This paper seeks to engage with the ideas expressed by Professor Brazier in her commentary on the Charlotte Wyatt case and to develop contemporary analysis around parental rights, notions of best interests, and shared decision-making between parents and professionals. The article begins by setting the scene in relation to parental/professional conflict and frames the discussion in the context of medical decision-making. Parental rights are then explored before the analysis progresses to how the concept of best interests has recently developed. Finally, the article investigates the benefits of compromise, cooperation, and shared decision-making as the most effective method for resolving disputes concerning children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22351701     DOI: 10.1093/medlaw/fwr037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Law Rev        ISSN: 0967-0742            Impact factor:   1.267


  3 in total

1.  Foetal surgery and using in utero therapies to reduce the degree of disability after birth. Could it be morally defensible or even morally required?

Authors:  Constantinos Kanaris
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2017-03

2.  Living bioethics, clinical ethics committees and children's consent to heart surgery.

Authors:  Priscilla Alderson; Deborah Bowman; Joe Brierley; Martin J Elliott; Romana Kazmi; Rosa Mendizabal-Espinosa; Jonathan Montgomery; Katy Sutcliffe; Hugo Wellesley
Journal:  Clin Ethics       Date:  2021-07-30

3.  Charlie Gard and the weight of parental rights to seek experimental treatment.

Authors:  Giles Birchley
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2018-05-17       Impact factor: 5.926

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.