Literature DB >> 22351696

Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial.

Maggie C U Cheang1, K David Voduc, Dongsheng Tu, Shan Jiang, Samuel Leung, Stephen K Chia, Lois E Shepherd, Mark N Levine, Kathleen I Pritchard, Sherri Davies, Inge J Stijleman, Carole Davis, Mark T W Ebbert, Joel S Parker, Matthew J Ellis, Philip S Bernard, Charles M Perou, Torsten O Nielsen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Recent studies suggest that intrinsic breast cancer subtypes may differ in their responsiveness to specific chemotherapy regimens. We examined this hypothesis on NCIC.CTG MA.5, a clinical trial randomizing premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer to adjuvant CMF (cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil) versus CEF (cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-fluorouracil) chemotherapy. EXPERIMENTAL
DESIGN: Intrinsic subtype was determined for 476 tumors using the quantitative reverse transcriptase PCR PAM50 gene expression test. Luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched (HER2-E), and basal-like subtypes were correlated with relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using Kaplan-Meier plots and log-rank testing. Multivariable Cox regression analyses determined significance of interaction between treatment and intrinsic subtypes.
RESULTS: Intrinsic subtypes were associated with RFS (P = 0.0005) and OS (P < 0.0001) on the combined cohort. The HER2-E showed the greatest benefit from CEF versus CMF, with absolute 5-year RFS and OS differences exceeding 20%, whereas there was a less than 2% difference for non-HER2-E tumors (interaction test P = 0.03 for RFS and 0.03 for OS). Within clinically defined Her2(+) tumors, 79% (72 of 91) were classified as the HER2-E subtype by gene expression and this subset was strongly associated with better response to CEF versus CMF (62% vs. 22%, P = 0.0006). There was no significant difference in benefit between CEF and CMF in basal-like tumors [n = 94; HR, 1.1; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6-2.1 for RFS and HR, 1.3; 95% CI, 0.7-2.5 for OS].
CONCLUSION: HER2-E strongly predicted anthracycline sensitivity. The chemotherapy-sensitive basal-like tumors showed no added benefit for CEF over CMF, suggesting that nonanthracycline regimens may be adequate in this subtype although further investigation is required. ©2012 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22351696      PMCID: PMC3743660          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  21 in total

1.  Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Marco Colleoni; Bernard F Cole; Giuseppe Viale; Meredith M Regan; Karen N Price; Eugenio Maiorano; Mauro G Mastropasqua; Diana Crivellari; Richard D Gelber; Aron Goldhirsch; Alan S Coates; Barry A Gusterson
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-05-10       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Alteration of topoisomerase II-alpha gene in human breast cancer: association with responsiveness to anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Michael F Press; Guido Sauter; Marc Buyse; Leslie Bernstein; Roberta Guzman; Angela Santiago; Ivonne E Villalobos; Wolfgang Eiermann; Tadeusz Pienkowski; Miguel Martin; Nicholas Robert; John Crown; Valerie Bee; Henry Taupin; Kerry J Flom; Isabelle Tabah-Fisch; Giovanni Pauletti; Mary-Ann Lindsay; Alessandro Riva; Dennis J Slamon
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-12-28       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  HER2 and TOP2A as predictive markers for anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment of breast cancer: a meta-analysis of individual patient data.

Authors:  Angelo Di Leo; Christine Desmedt; John M S Bartlett; Fanny Piette; Bent Ejlertsen; Kathleen I Pritchard; Denis Larsimont; Christopher Poole; Jorma Isola; Helena Earl; Henning Mouridsen; Frances P O'Malley; Fatima Cardoso; Minna Tanner; Alison Munro; Chris J Twelves; Christos Sotiriou; Lois Shepherd; David Cameron; Martine J Piccart; Marc Buyse
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 41.316

4.  A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  Torsten O Nielsen; Joel S Parker; Samuel Leung; David Voduc; Mark Ebbert; Tammi Vickery; Sherri R Davies; Jacqueline Snider; Inge J Stijleman; Jerry Reed; Maggie C U Cheang; Elaine R Mardis; Charles M Perou; Philip S Bernard; Matthew J Ellis
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-09-13       Impact factor: 12.531

5.  CEF is superior to CMF for tumours with TOP2A aberrations: a Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis on Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group Study 89D.

Authors:  Katrín A Gunnarsdóttir; Maj-Britt Jensen; David Zahrieh; Richard D Gelber; Ann Knoop; Marco Bonetti; Henning Mouridsen; Bent Ejlertsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Breast cancer subtypes and the risk of local and regional relapse.

Authors:  K David Voduc; Maggie C U Cheang; Scott Tyldesley; Karen Gelmon; Torsten O Nielsen; Hagen Kennecke
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Topoisomerase II alpha and responsiveness of breast cancer to adjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  F P O'Malley; S Chia; D Tu; L E Shepherd; M N Levine; V H Bramwell; I L Andrulis; K I Pritchard
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-04-28       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Breast cancer molecular subclassification and estrogen receptor expression to predict efficacy of adjuvant anthracyclines-based chemotherapy: a biomarker study from two randomized trials.

Authors:  R Conforti; T Boulet; G Tomasic; E Taranchon; R Arriagada; M Spielmann; M Ducourtieux; J C Soria; T Tursz; S Delaloge; S Michiels; F Andre
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2007-05-21       Impact factor: 32.976

9.  Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Cornelia Liedtke; Chafika Mazouni; Kenneth R Hess; Fabrice André; Attila Tordai; Jaime A Mejia; W Fraser Symmans; Ana M Gonzalez-Angulo; Bryan Hennessy; Marjorie Green; Massimo Cristofanilli; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Lajos Pusztai
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Ki67 index, HER2 status, and prognosis of patients with luminal B breast cancer.

Authors:  Maggie C U Cheang; Stephen K Chia; David Voduc; Dongxia Gao; Samuel Leung; Jacqueline Snider; Mark Watson; Sherri Davies; Philip S Bernard; Joel S Parker; Charles M Perou; Matthew J Ellis; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2009-05-12       Impact factor: 13.506

View more
  45 in total

1.  Defining breast cancer intrinsic subtypes by quantitative receptor expression.

Authors:  Maggie C U Cheang; Miguel Martin; Torsten O Nielsen; Aleix Prat; David Voduc; Alvaro Rodriguez-Lescure; Amparo Ruiz; Stephen Chia; Lois Shepherd; Manuel Ruiz-Borrego; Lourdes Calvo; Emilio Alba; Eva Carrasco; Rosalia Caballero; Dongsheng Tu; Kathleen I Pritchard; Mark N Levine; Vivien H Bramwell; Joel Parker; Philip S Bernard; Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou; Angelo Di Leo; Lisa A Carey
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-04-23

Review 2.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for early female breast cancer: a systematic review of the evidence for the 2014 Cancer Care Ontario systemic therapy guideline.

Authors:  S Gandhi; G G Fletcher; A Eisen; M Mates; O C Freedman; S F Dent; M E Trudeau
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.677

3.  The therapeutic response of ER+/HER2- breast cancers differs according to the molecular Basal or Luminal subtype.

Authors:  François Bertucci; Pascal Finetti; Anthony Goncalves; Daniel Birnbaum
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-03-06

4.  Gene signatures in breast cancer: current and future uses.

Authors:  Enrique Espinosa Arranz; Juan Ángel Fresno Vara; Angelo Gámez-Pozo; Pilar Zamora
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-12-01       Impact factor: 4.243

5.  Nestin expression in breast cancer: association with prognosis and subtype on 3641 cases with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Karama Asleh; Jennifer R Won; Dongxia Gao; K David Voduc; Torsten O Nielsen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Multigene Assays for Classification, Prognosis, and Prediction in Breast Cancer: a Critical Review on the Background and Clinical Utility.

Authors:  P Sinn; S Aulmann; R Wirtz; S Schott; F Marmé; Z Varga; A Lebeau; H Kreipe; A Schneeweiss
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.915

7.  Intrinsic subtypes from the PAM50 gene expression assay in a population-based breast cancer survivor cohort: prognostication of short- and long-term outcomes.

Authors:  Bette J Caan; Carol Sweeney; Laurel A Habel; Marilyn L Kwan; Candyce H Kroenke; Erin K Weltzien; Charles P Quesenberry; Adrienne Castillo; Rachel E Factor; Lawrence H Kushi; Philip S Bernard
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 8.  Genomic profiling in luminal breast cancer.

Authors:  Oleg Gluz; Daniel Hofmann; Rachel Würstlein; Cornelia Liedtke; Ulrike Nitz; Nadia Harbeck
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  The genomic landscape of breast cancer as a therapeutic roadmap.

Authors:  Matthew J Ellis; Charles M Perou
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 39.397

10.  Prognostic analysis of triple-negative breast cancer patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy of fluorouracil, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide.

Authors:  Weiling Sun; Chunhong Li; Meiyan Liu; Wei Liu; Chunyu Yang; L I Cai
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-02-02       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.