PURPOSE: Evaluate the hypothesis that relation of breast cancer associated with dietary fiber intakes varies by type of fiber, menopausal, and the tumor's hormone receptor status. METHODS: A case-control study of female breast cancer was conducted in Connecticut. A total of 557 incident breast cancer cases and 536 age frequency-matched controls were included in the analysis. Information on dietary intakes was collected through in-person interviews with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire and was converted into nutrient intakes. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Among pre-menopausal women, higher intake of soluble fiber (highest versus lowest quartile of intake) was associated with a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.15-0.97, P (trend) = 0.08). When further restricted to pre-menopausal women with ER(-) tumors, the adjusted OR for the highest quartile of intake was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.03-0.69, P (trend) = 0.02) for soluble fiber intake. Among post-menopausal women, no reduced risk of breast cancer was observed for either soluble or insoluble fiber intakes or among ER(+) or ER(-) tumor groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study show that dietary soluble fiber intake is associated with a significantly reduced risk of ER(-) breast cancer among pre-menopausal women. Additional studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm these results.
PURPOSE: Evaluate the hypothesis that relation of breast cancer associated with dietary fiber intakes varies by type of fiber, menopausal, and the tumor's hormone receptor status. METHODS: A case-control study of female breast cancer was conducted in Connecticut. A total of 557 incident breast cancer cases and 536 age frequency-matched controls were included in the analysis. Information on dietary intakes was collected through in-person interviews with a semi-quantitative food frequency questionnaire and was converted into nutrient intakes. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional logistic regression. RESULTS: Among pre-menopausal women, higher intake of soluble fiber (highest versus lowest quartile of intake) was associated with a significantly reduced risk of breast cancer (OR = 0.38, 95% CI, 0.15-0.97, P (trend) = 0.08). When further restricted to pre-menopausal women with ER(-) tumors, the adjusted OR for the highest quartile of intake was 0.15 (95% CI, 0.03-0.69, P (trend) = 0.02) for soluble fiber intake. Among post-menopausal women, no reduced risk of breast cancer was observed for either soluble or insoluble fiber intakes or among ER(+) or ER(-) tumor groups. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this study show that dietary soluble fiber intake is associated with a significantly reduced risk of ER(-) breast cancer among pre-menopausal women. Additional studies with larger sample size are needed to confirm these results.
Authors: Paul Terry; Meera Jain; Anthony B Miller; Geoffrey R Howe; Thomas E Rohan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Pratima Nangia-Makker; Victor Hogan; Yuichiro Honjo; Sara Baccarini; Larry Tait; Robert Bresalier; Avraham Raz Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2002-12-18 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: G R Howe; T Hirohata; T G Hislop; J M Iscovich; J M Yuan; K Katsouyanni; F Lubin; E Marubini; B Modan; T Rohan Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 1990-04-04 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Shelley L Goodstine; Tongzhang Zheng; Theodore R Holford; Barbara A Ward; Darryl Carter; Patricia H Owens; Susan T Mayne Journal: J Nutr Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Eunyoung Cho; Donna Spiegelman; David J Hunter; Wendy Y Chen; Graham A Colditz; Walter C Willett Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2003-11 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Pamela L Horn-Ross; K J Hoggatt; Dee W West; Melissa R Krone; Susan L Stewart; Hoda Anton; Culver Leslie Bernstei; Dennis Deapen; David Peel; Richard Pinder; Peggy Reynolds; Ronald K Ross; William Wright; Al Ziogas Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2002-06 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Michelle D Holmes; Simin Liu; Susan E Hankinson; Graham A Colditz; David J Hunter; Walter C Willett Journal: Am J Epidemiol Date: 2004-04-15 Impact factor: 4.897