BACKGROUND: To review vascularized-pigment epithelial detachment (V-PED) treatment visual outcome, and to assess acute retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear incidence. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two eyes of 125 consecutive patients with age-related macular degeneration and V-PED were included. Ninety-four eyes (71.2%) were associated with choroidal new vessels (CNV), 38 (28.8%) with retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). Patients, treated over a 10-year period with the time-current therapy, received: verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) (group 1, 38 eyes), combined intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and PDT (group 2, 44 eyes) or intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) (group 3, 50 eyes). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 20.5 months. At month 12, all eyes treated with PDT or with IVTA and PDT showed a mean significant severe visual decrease. Eyes with CNV lost -0.67 and -0.37 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01 respectively), and eyes with RAP -0.55 and -0.31 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01 respectively). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%) and in six eyes (13.6%) in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy showed slight mean visual acuity decrease at month 12. Those with CNV had a mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.36 ± 0.24 logMAR, final of 0.44 ± 0.30 logMAR (-0.08 logMAR, n.s.). In eyes with RAP, mean baseline BCVA was 0.58 ± 0.39 logMAR, final was 0.78 ± 0.47 logMAR (-0.20 logMAR, n.s.). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%). Patients with either V-PED with CNV or a better baseline BCVA showed greater risk of acute RPE tear (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Effective treatment for vascularized PED is still lacking. Until now, only stabilization of the disease has been achieved using anti-VEGF therapy, but the risk of RPE tear can further hamper our expectations. Baseline characteristics are helpful for prognosis, but patients must be informed of the uncertain response. New therapeutic strategies are needed.
BACKGROUND: To review vascularized-pigment epithelial detachment (V-PED) treatment visual outcome, and to assess acute retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) tear incidence. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-two eyes of 125 consecutive patients with age-related macular degeneration and V-PED were included. Ninety-four eyes (71.2%) were associated with choroidal new vessels (CNV), 38 (28.8%) with retinal angiomatous proliferation (RAP). Patients, treated over a 10-year period with the time-current therapy, received: verteporfin photodynamic therapy (PDT) (group 1, 38 eyes), combined intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) and PDT (group 2, 44 eyes) or intravitreal anti-VEGF injection (bevacizumab or ranibizumab) (group 3, 50 eyes). RESULTS: Mean follow-up was 20.5 months. At month 12, all eyes treated with PDT or with IVTA and PDT showed a mean significant severe visual decrease. Eyes with CNV lost -0.67 and -0.37 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p < 0.01 respectively), and eyes with RAP -0.55 and -0.31 logMAR (p < 0.01 and p = 0.01 respectively). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%) and in six eyes (13.6%) in groups 1 and 2 respectively. Eyes treated with anti-VEGF therapy showed slight mean visual acuity decrease at month 12. Those with CNV had a mean baseline best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of 0.36 ± 0.24 logMAR, final of 0.44 ± 0.30 logMAR (-0.08 logMAR, n.s.). In eyes with RAP, mean baseline BCVA was 0.58 ± 0.39 logMAR, final was 0.78 ± 0.47 logMAR (-0.20 logMAR, n.s.). RPE tear occurred in 14 eyes (36.8%). Patients with either V-PED with CNV or a better baseline BCVA showed greater risk of acute RPE tear (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Effective treatment for vascularized PED is still lacking. Until now, only stabilization of the disease has been achieved using anti-VEGF therapy, but the risk of RPE tear can further hamper our expectations. Baseline characteristics are helpful for prognosis, but patients must be informed of the uncertain response. New therapeutic strategies are needed.
Authors: L A Yannuzzi; M Hope-Ross; J S Slakter; D R Guyer; J A Sorenson; A C Ho; D E Sperber; K B Freund; D A Orlock Journal: Retina Date: 1994 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Pia E Leon; Sandro Saviano; Andrea Zanei; Marco R Pastore; Elvira Guaglione; Alessandro Mangogna; Daniele Tognetto Journal: Int J Ophthalmol Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 1.779
Authors: Georgios D Panos; Zisis Gatzioufas; Ioannis K Petropoulos; Doukas Dardabounis; Gabriele Thumann; Farhad Hafezi Journal: Drug Des Devel Ther Date: 2013-07-10 Impact factor: 4.162