Literature DB >> 22348954

Outcome of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures following knee arthroplasty.

M F Hoffmann1, C B Jones, D L Sietsema, S J Koenig, P Tornetta.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The majority of periprosthetic fractures around the knee occur at the supracondylar region of the distal femur. Fixation of distal femoral fractures in osteoporotic bone with short segment remains a challenge, especially after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Internal fixation of these fractures using locking plates has become popular. The purpose of this study was to evaluate a consecutive series of periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures treated with locked periarticular plate fixation with regard to surgical procedure, complications and clinical outcome.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From two academic trauma centres, 55 consecutive periprosthetic distal femoral fractures (Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Osteosynthesefragen/Orthopaedic Trauma Association, AO/OTA 33) were retrospectively identified as having been treated with locked plate fixation. Of these, 36 fractures in 35 patients (86.1% female) met the inclusion criteria. Patients had an average age of 73.2 years (range 54-95 years). Fixation constructs for plate length and working length were delineated. Nonunion, infection and implant failure were used as complication variables. Demographics were assessed. Outcome was addressed radiographically and clinically according to Kristensen et al.(1) by range of motion and pain.
RESULTS: Twenty-five of 36 fractures (69.4%) healed after the index procedure. Eight of 36 fractures (22.2%) developed a nonunion with three fractures (8.3%) leading to hardware failure. Nine of the 36 patients (25%) were radiographically diagnosed with notching of the anterior femoral cortex. Regarding technical aspects, distance from the anterior flange of the femoral component to fracture was significantly shorter in patients with compared to without anterior notching (t=3.68, p=0.02). Patients who underwent submuscular plate insertion compared to an extensive lateral approach had a reduced nonunion risk (χ(2)=0.05). No difference in infection rate was found for submuscular procedures compared with open procedures (χ(2)=0.85). Range of motion was reduced in most of the patients and 13.5% had a persistent loss of extension of 5°. More than 77% of the patients reported no or only mild pain during the last office visit. Range of motion loss did not influence pain. Successful treatment according to Cain et al.(2) was achieved in 83%. Using Kristensen's(1) criteria, 56% of the knees had acceptable flexion.
CONCLUSION: Operative fixation of periprosthetic distal femoral fractures after TKA continues to be challenging. Notching of the anterior femoral cortex should be avoided. Loss of reduction and high failure rates still occur with locked plating and may be related to underlying factors. Indirect reduction and submuscular plate insertion technique reduce nonunion risk.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22348954     DOI: 10.1016/j.injury.2012.01.025

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Injury        ISSN: 0020-1383            Impact factor:   2.586


  33 in total

1.  Healing results of periprosthetic distal femur fractures treated with far cortical locking technology: a preliminary retrospective study.

Authors:  Zachary Ries; Kirk Hansen; Michael Bottlang; Steven Madey; Daniel Fitzpatrick; J L Marsh
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2013

2.  A case series of mortality and morbidity in distal femoral periprosthetic fractures.

Authors:  Toby Jennison; Rathan Yarlagadda
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2019-09-11

3.  Periprosthetic fractures around the knee: current concepts and advances in management.

Authors:  Michael R Whitehouse; Sanchit Mehendale
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2014-06

Review 4.  [Importance of revision- and tumor-endoprosthetics in the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the lower extremity].

Authors:  P M Prodinger; N Harrasser; C Suren; F Pohlig; H Mühlhofer; J Schauwecker; R von Eisenhart-Rothe
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.000

5.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

6.  Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures above total knee arthroplasty: comparison of the locking and non-locking plating methods.

Authors:  Dae Kyung Bae; Sang Jun Song; Kyoung Ho Yoon; Tae Yong Kim
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-06-22       Impact factor: 4.342

7.  DXA evaluation of femoral bone mineral density and cortical width in patients with prior total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  T Blaty; D Krueger; R Illgen; M Squire; B Heiderscheit; N Binkley; P Anderson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 4.507

8.  What are the causes of revision total knee arthroplasty in Japan?

Authors:  Yasuhiko Kasahara; Tokifumi Majima; Shoichi Kimura; Osamu Nishiike; Jun Uchida
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Excellent outcomes after double-locked plating in very low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.

Authors:  Kyeong-Hyeon Park; Chang-Wug Oh; Ki-Chul Park; Joon-Woo Kim; Jong-Keon Oh; Hee-Soo Kyung; Hee-June Kim; Yong-Cheol Yoon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 10.  [Periprosthetic knee fractures].

Authors:  T Mittlmeier; M Beck; U Bosch; A Wichelhaus
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2016-01       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.