Literature DB >> 33128096

Excellent outcomes after double-locked plating in very low periprosthetic distal femoral fractures.

Kyeong-Hyeon Park1, Chang-Wug Oh2, Ki-Chul Park3, Joon-Woo Kim1, Jong-Keon Oh4, Hee-Soo Kyung1, Hee-June Kim1, Yong-Cheol Yoon5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Very low periprosthetic distal femur fractures (PPDFFs) are rare injuries and often have a relatively high failure rate after single lateral locked plating. The double plating technique yields good outcomes in osteoporotic fractures of the distal femur. To date, there is limited information on double-locked plate fixation of very low PPDFFs. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes and complications of surgically treated very low PPDFFs using double-locked plate fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 2013 and December 2018, sixty-one consecutive patients with PPDFFs have been conducted. Only Su type III PPDFFs with double-locked plate fixation through a lateral minimally invasive approach and a medial subvastus approach to the distal femur were analyzed. Patients were encouraged to perform straight leg raising exercises and active knee motion on the second postoperative day. Assisted weight bearing from the early postoperative days was supported, and full weight-bearing was allowed after healing the fracture site. All patients were evaluated according to the time to union, limb alignment, range of knee motion, Knee Society Score, and presence of complications.
RESULTS: Twenty one patients (17 females and 4 males, mean age 76 years, range 56-90) were included in the study. There were 10 of 33-A1, 6 of 33-A2 and 5 of 33 A3 fractures, according to the AO classification. Of 21 patients, 20 achieved union at an average of 14 weeks postoperatively. Postoperative limb alignment was satisfactory in all cases, with an average mechanical distal lateral femur angle of 89° and average mechanical posterior distal femur angle of 86°. All patients recovered the knee joint motion similar to that of the contralateral side, and daily life pre-injury. The average knee and function scores were 94 and 89, respectively. There were one case of non-union and three cases of superficial wound infection, which resolved after intravenous antibiotic therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: Double locked plating showed excellent radiographic and functional outcomes with few complications in patients with very low PPDFFs. Based on these promising results, we propose the consideration of double-locked plate fixation in the treatment of very low PPDFFs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Distal femur fracture; Double plate; Locked plate; Periprosthetic fracture; Su classification

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 33128096     DOI: 10.1007/s00402-020-03655-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0936-8051            Impact factor:   3.067


  25 in total

1.  Operative stabilization of supracondylar femur fractures above total knee arthroplasty: a comparison of four treatment methods.

Authors:  Peter L Althausen; Mark A Lee; Christopher G Finkemeier; John P Meehan; Juan J Rodrigo
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 2.  Periprosthetic distal femur fractures: current concepts.

Authors:  Aaron Nauth; Bill Ristevski; Thierry Bégué; Emil H Schemitsch
Journal:  J Orthop Trauma       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.512

3.  Modern retrograde intramedullary nails versus periarticular locked plates for supracondylar femur fractures after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  R Michael Meneghini; Brian J Keyes; Kartheek K Reddy; Dean C Maar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew R Bong; Kenneth A Egol; Kenneth J Koval; Frederick J Kummer; Edward T Su; Kazuho Iesaka; Jordi Bayer; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 5.  Treatment of acute distal femur fractures above a total knee arthroplasty: systematic review of 415 cases (1981-2006).

Authors:  Diego A Herrera; Philip J Kregor; Peter A Cole; Bruce A Levy; Anders Jönsson; Michael Zlowodzki
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.717

Review 6.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures above total knee replacements.

Authors:  Edward T Su; Hargovind DeWal; Paul E Di Cesare
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.020

7.  Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of trigen retrograde intramedullary (i.m.) nail, dynamic condylar screw (DCS), and locking compression plate (LCP) condylar plate.

Authors:  Jake P Heiney; Michael D Barnett; Gregory A Vrabec; Andrew J Schoenfeld; Avinash Baji; Glen O Njus
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  2009-02

8.  Classification and treatment of periprosthetic supracondylar femur fractures.

Authors:  William Ricci
Journal:  J Knee Surg       Date:  2013-02-08       Impact factor: 2.757

9.  The outcome and complications of the locked plating management for the periprosthetic distal femur fractures after a total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ashok S Gavaskar; Naveen Chowdary Tummala; Muthukumar Subramanian
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-05-15

10.  Comparing Outcomes of Tumor Prosthesis Revision and Locking Plate Fixation in Supracondylar Femoral Periprosthetic Fractures.

Authors:  Gerrard Gan; Yee Hong Teo; Ernest Beng Kee Kwek
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-05-18
View more
  6 in total

1.  Early complications and reoperation rates are similar amongst open reduction internal fixation, intramedullary nail, and distal femoral replacement for periprosthetic distal femur fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  David A Quinzi; Gabriel Ramirez; Nathan B Kaplan; Thomas G Myers; Caroline P Thirukumaran; Benjamin F Ricciardi
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-03-20       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  [Current status and progress of locking plate in the treatment of distal femoral comminuted fracture].

Authors:  Jinyou Shi; Yuzhou Xiao
Journal:  Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi       Date:  2021-10-15

3.  Periprosthetic knee fractures in an elderly population: open reduction and internal fixation vs distal femur megaprostheses.

Authors:  Davide De Marco; Federica Messina; Cesare Meschini; Maria Serena Oliva; Giuseppe Rovere; Giuseppe Maccagnano; Giovanni Noia; Giulio Maccauro; Antonio Ziranu
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2022-04-25

4.  Short-term outcomes of periprosthetic compared to native distal femur fractures, a national database study.

Authors:  Alex Upfill-Brown; Armin Arshi; Troy Sekimura; Christopher Lee; Alexandra Stavrakis; Adam Sassoon
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Biomechanical and anatomical considerations for dual plating of distal femur fractures: a systematic literature review.

Authors:  Graham J DeKeyser; Anne J Hakim; Dillon C O'Neill; Carsten W Schlickewei; Lucas S Marchand; Justin M Haller
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 2.928

Review 6.  Union rates and functional outcome of double plating of the femur: systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M F Lodde; M J Raschke; J Stolberg-Stolberg; J Everding; S Rosslenbroich; J C Katthagen
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 2.928

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.