| Literature DB >> 22347659 |
Egemen Tuzun1, Roger Bick, Cihan Kadipasaoglu, Jeffrey L Conger, Brian J Poindexter, Igor D Gregoric, O H Frazier, Jeffrey A Towbin, Branislav Radovancevic.
Abstract
Purpose. To provide an ovine model of ventricular remodeling and reverse remodeling by creating congestive heart failure (CHF) and then treating it by implanting a left ventricular assist device (LVAD). Methods. We induced volume-overload heart failure in 2 sheep; 20 weeks later, we implanted an LVAD and assessed recovery 11 weeks thereafter. We examined changes in histologic and hemodynamic data and levels of cellular markers of CHF. Results. After CHF induction, we found increases in LV end-diastolic pressure, LV systolic and diastolic dimensions, wall thickness, left atrial diameter, and atrial natriuretic protein (ANP) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) levels; β-adrenergic receptor (BAR) and dystrophin expression decreased markedly. Biopsies confirmed LV remodeling. After LVAD support, LV systolic and diastolic dimensions, wall thickness, and mass, and ANP and ET-1 levels decreased. Histopathologic and hemodynamic markers improved, and BAR and dystrophin expression normalized. Conclusions. We describe a successful sheep model for ventricular and reverse remodeling.Entities:
Year: 2011 PMID: 22347659 PMCID: PMC3262518 DOI: 10.5402/2011/831062
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ISRN Cardiol ISSN: 2090-5580
Figure 1(a) Normal ventriculogram obtained before creation of mitral regurgitation (MR). (b) After chordal disruption, the ventriculogram shows 2nd- to 3rd-degree MR.
Mean echocardiographic measurements obtained in each individual sheep during the 1st operation (after mitral chordal disruption), 2nd operation (left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation), and 3rd operation (after 11 weeks of LVAD support).
| Time | LVDD (mm) | LVSD (mm) | IVS (mm) | PW (mm) | RVDD (mm) | LA (mm) | EF (%) | LV mass (g) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||||||
| 1st operation (baseline) | 32 | 22 | 7 | 7 | 19 | 32 | 55 | 201 |
| 2nd operation (wk 20) | 59 | 44 | 11 | 9 | 26 | 48 | 44 | 570 |
| 3rd operation (wk 31) | 41 | 26 | 11 | 10 | 29 | 48 | 56 | 210 |
|
| ||||||||
| 1st operation (baseline) | 36 | 26 | 9 | 9 | 25 | 36 | 65 | 233 |
| 2nd operation (wk 20) | 68 | 50 | 13 | 11 | 30 | 56 | 50 | 610 |
| 3rd operation (wk 31) | 45 | 30 | 13 | 12 | 35 | 56 | 64 | 236 |
EF: ejection fraction; IVS: interventricular septal thickness; LA: left atrial dimension; LV: left ventricular; LVDD: left ventricular diastolic dimension; LVSD: left ventricular systolic dimension; PW: posterior wall thickness; RVDD: right ventricular diastolic dimension.
Figure 2(a) Biopsy specimen obtained at left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation, showing a loss of myofilaments in the perinuclear region (asterisk) and the presence of cytoplasmic vacuoles (arrows). (b) Biopsy specimen obtained after 11 weeks of LVAD unloading, showing a reduced loss of myofilaments, with fewer and smaller cytoplasmic vacuoles (arrow) and more and larger mitochondria (dagger). Magnification ×2500; scale bar 2 μM.
Figure 3Identification of markers in heart failure and recovery. The results are expressed as the mean and standard error for each time point: before induction of heart failure (a), after induction of heart failure (b), and after 11 weeks of LVAD support (c). ANP: atrial natriuretic protein; BAR: β-adrenergic receptors; ET-1: endothelin-1; DYS: dystrophin; FPD: fluorescence pixel density.