Literature DB >> 22347266

Characterization of Eimeria Species in Commercial Broilers by PCR Based on ITS1 Regions of rDNA.

H Hamidinejat1, Mr Seifiabad Shapouri, M Mayahi, M Pourmehdi Borujeni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Coccidiosis is an intestinal disease of chickens caused by various species of protozoan parasites within the genus Eimeria. Diagnosis and genetic characterization of different species of Eimeria are central to the prevention, surveillance, and control of coccidiosis. The aim of this study was to detect different chicken Eimeria species from several areas in Khuzestan, southwest Iran.
METHODS: From February to September 2008, PCR assay as well as parasitological examinations was applied for the identification of field isolates of Eimeria parasites around Ahvaz, center of Khuzestan, southwest Iran. Data were analyzed by the Kappa statistic test.
RESULTS: Eimeria maxima, E. necatrix, E. tenella, E. acervulina and E. mitis were detected in this study. The prevalence of Eimeria spp. was 31.5% (126 of 400) and E. tenella was the most prevalent species in Khuzestan. Based on the Kappa statistical test, a good correlation between the results of PCR and traditional biometrical methods was only observed for E. maxima.
CONCLUSION: The present study is the first on the prevalence of Eimeria species in Khuzestan, based on the molecular findings. We believe that traditional methods are not sufficiently reliable for specific diagnosis of Eimeria species in chickens and PCR based amplification of DNA sequence of parasite, could resolve this problem.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Eimeria; ITS1; Iran; Microscopic examinations; PCR; Poultry coccidiosis

Year:  2010        PMID: 22347266      PMCID: PMC3279851     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Parasitol        ISSN: 1735-7020            Impact factor:   1.012


Introduction

Protozoan parasites of the genus Eimeria (Coccidia: Eimeriidae) are highly successful organisms which inhabit and multiplies in the intestinal tract. These parasites cause chickens coccidiosis, an enteric disease of major economic importance worldwide (1). Economic importance of the disease is due to production losses and high morbidity resulting from an acute, bloody enteritis and mortality rates (2). However, intestinal lesions of the infection vary, depending on the species of coccidian. About 1800 Eimeria spp. affect the intestinal mucosa of different mammals and birds, but seven species of Eimeria including E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, E. maxima, E. brunetti, E. mitis, and E. praecox are the causative agents of coccidiosis in chickens (3). Diagnosis of coccidiosis is based on clinical features and gut pathology of host, parasite characteristics such as morphology at different stages of parasitism, and the pre-patent period (4, 5). Analysis of these characteristics is labor intensive for diagnosis and does not provide accurate data for identification of the Eimeria species (6). Identification and genetic characterization of different species of Eimeria genus are central to prevention, surveillance, and control of coccidiosis. This is particularly important with regard to the appearance of a widespread anticoccidial resistance of Eimeria species and the problems associated with drug residues. Due to difficulties in the morphologic identification of some of chicken Eimeria spp., diagnostic laboratories are increasingly utilizing DNA-based technologies for the specific identification of the parasite (7). So far, there is limited knowledge on the epidemiology of Eimeria infections under different rearing conditions in Iran. In The present study, together with morphometric diagnosis, PCR assay, based on the amplification of internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS1) regions of ribosomal DNA (8) was used for identification of chicken Eimeria species in Khuzestan Province, southwest Iran.

Materials and Methods

Sample collection preparation

From February to September 2008, 400 samples of fresh fecal droppings were collected by cluster sampling from 40 broiler chickens flocks without previous exposure to anticoccidial vaccines. The sampled flocks were located in different areas within a radius of 20 to 100 km from the center of Khuzestan Province. Samples of each flock were collected from different locations in the poultry house. One hundred samples, containing a high number of Eimeria and representing all areas of the province were selected and preserved in 2.5% potassium dichromate at 28°C. After sporulation of oocysts, potassium dichromate was removed from the master stock by repeated centrifugation and resuspension in water. Oocysts present in feces were then purified by a saturated saline solution and washed by centrifugation at 1000 x g for 5 min with distilled water. The sediment containing oocysts was resuspended in phosphate buffered saline (PBS) pH 7.4 with 0.1% Tween 80 and homogenized by vortexing and subsequent centrifugation at 800 x g for 5 min. Thereafter, a 6% solution of sodium hypochlorite was added, 20 minutes incubation was performed at 4°C and the oocysts were finally washed 4 times, with distilled water (6).

Parsitologic examination

A modified saturated salt flotation technique was used to isolate oocysts for length measurements using a calibrated ocular micrometer at 400x magnification (4). Fifty random oocysts from each sample were examined by measuring their length and width with light microscopy, armed with calibrate ocular lens as well as determination of the oocysts shape and index (Length/Width). For more accurate diagnosis, sporocysts’ diameters were also determined (9).

PCR protocol

Sporozoites were released from oocysts and sporocysts wall by sonication and DNA was extracted from sporozoites by Stool Mini Kit extraction (Qiagen) according to manufacturer's recommendation. Single PCR assays targeting ITS-1 regions of ribosomal DNA were performed for each of the seven chicken Eimeria species. Forward and reverse species-specific primer sequences used in this study have been reported previously by Haug et al. 2007 (10) (Table 1). Amplification of the ITS-1 sequences of genomic rDNA was carried out in 20 µl reaction volumes containing 2 µl of DNA template, 8 pmol of reverse and forward primers, 3.0 mM MgCl2, 2.0 µl 10 X PCR Buffer, 200 µM of each dNTP and 0.4 U Taq DNA Polymerase. Thermal program of PCR was as follows: denaturation step at 95°C for 5 min, 35 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 30 s, annealing at 58°C or 65°C for 30 s and extension at 72°C for 1 min. A final prolonged extension step at 72°C for 3 min completed the PCR process. A commercial vaccine (Paracox® 8, UK) which included all the eight pathogenic Eimeria species of chicken was used for positive controls and fecal samples without any oocyst examined by floatation method used as negative control in PCR. To verify the results, 10 µl of each PCR product was electrophoresed in a 1.5% agarose gel, stained with ethidium bromide, and visualized on a UV transilluminator. The PCR products were identified by size using a 100 base pair ladder.
Table 1

Sequences of the PCR primer pairs used (10)

Eimeria speciesAmplicon size (bp)Primer sequence 5′ to 3′
E. maxima2055-GTGGGACTGTGGTGATGGGG-3 5-ACCAGCATGCGCTCACAACCC-3'
E. acevulina1455-GGGCTTGGATGATGTTTGCTG-3 5-GCAATGATGCTTGCACAGTCAGG-3
E. brunetti1835-CTGGGGCTGCAGCGACAGGG-3 5-ATCGATGGCCCCATCCCGCAT-3
E.mitis3305-GTTTATTTCCTGTCGTCGTCTCGC-3 5-GTATGCAAGAGAGAATCGGGATTCC-3
E. praecox2155-CATCGGAATGGCTTTTTGAAAGCG-3 5-GCATGCGCTAACAACTCCCCTT-3
E. tenella2785-AATTTAGTCCATCGCAACCCTTG-3 5-CGAGCGCTCTGCATACGACA-3
E. necatrix1605-AGTATGGGCGTGAGCATGGAG-3 5-GATCAGTCTCATCATAATTCTCGCG-3
Sequences of the PCR primer pairs used (10)

Statistical analysis

The Kappa statistic test (κ) was used to test the level of agreement between the PCR and the parsitologic examination for the detection of Eimeria species. Kappa and its 95% Confidence Interval (CI), was used further to measure the degree of agreement between the two procedures after taking into account the probability of agreement by chance alone. Strength of agreement based on κ was judged according to the following guidelines: <0.2=slight; 0.2–0.4=fair; 0.4– 0.6=moderate; 0.6–0.8=good; >0.8=very good (11).

Results

Out of 400 specimens collected, 126 (31.5%) fecal droppings were positive for oocysts of Eimeria spp. in parasitological examination (E. tenella=31%, E. maxima=24.6%, E. acervulina=23%, E. mitis=12.7% and 8.73%). The data showed that E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, E. mitis and E. maxima exist in poultry farms of Khuzestan by both molecular examination, using species-specific PCR (Fig. 1 and 2) and parasitological methods. E. tenella was the most prevalent species and E. brunette and E. praecox were not detected at all. PCR analyses of 100 collected samples showed that all the identified species were present in different areas, around the center of Khuzestan Province.
Fig. 1

Agarose gel electrophoresis of Eimeria species-specific PCR products. Polymerase chain reaction based on amplification of the species-specific ITS-1 sequences of the genomic rDNA Positive reactions: E. acervulina (145bp) (2-Control, 3-Sample), E. maxima (205 bp) (4-Control, 5-Sample), E. tenella (278 bp) (6-Control, 7-Sample), E. mitis(330bp)(8-Control, 9-Sample) and E. necatrix(160bp)(10-Control, 11-Sample). 1=100 bp ladder

Agarose gel electrophoresis of Eimeria species-specific PCR products. Polymerase chain reaction based on amplification of the species-specific ITS-1 sequences of the genomic rDNA Positive reactions: E. acervulina (145bp) (2-Control, 3-Sample), E. maxima (205 bp) (4-Control, 5-Sample), E. tenella (278 bp) (6-Control, 7-Sample), E. mitis(330bp)(8-Control, 9-Sample) and E. necatrix(160bp)(10-Control, 11-Sample). 1=100 bp ladder Statistical analyses using Kappa test revealed a poor agreement between PCR and the traditional biometrical identification for diagnosis of detected Eimeria species, except for E. maxima and to some extent for E. acervulina (κ=0.35, 030, 0.56, 0.22 and 0.84 for E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. acervulina, E.mitis and E. maxima respectively).

Discussion

The specific diagnosis of Eimeria infections in chickens is clearly central to a better understanding of epidemiology and dynamics of the disease in intensive and extensive chicken establishments. This is particularly important for planning an effective prevention and control program of coccidiosis. Traditionally, diagnosis has been achieved by detecting Eimeria oocysts excreted in the feces of chickens by measuring oocyst and sporocyst dimensions or assessing the site and extent of the pathological lesions in the intestine of chickens. Although the microscopic examinations can absolutely show the negative fecal samples, such traditional methods have generally had major limitations in the specific diagnosis of coccidiosis and identification of Eimeria species. These approaches are unreliable, particularly when multiple species of Eimeria simultaneously infect a single host and there is overlap in the size and shape of oocysts and the sites of infection in the intestines (5). During recent years, there have been significant advances in the development of molecular-diagnostic tools. Several PCR based assays targeting different regions of the Eimeria genome have been described, such as the 5S rRNA (, the small subunit rRNA (12, 13), the sporozoite antigen gene EASZ240/160 (14) and ITS-1 (8, 15–17) and ITS-2 (18–20) genomic regions. Since the ITS regions are less conserved than the rRNA genes, detecting variations in this region of DNA sequence, makes the design of primers straightforward and reduces the risk of cross reactions among different species (21). Apart from an accurate identification of Eimeria species, molecular methods can also be helpful in epidemiological study of the parasite, an aspect that has been less investigated to date. At yet, there has not been any documentary report related to the occurrence and epidemiological pattern of the pathogenic Eimeria species of domestic chickens, in Khuzestan. Therefore, the results of the present study are the first on the prevalence of Eimeria species in the region, based on the molecular findings. Out of 400 specimens collected, 126 (31.5%) samples were positive for Eimeria spp. Nowzari et al. in a large study including 5 provinces of Iran showed that E. maxima, E. mitis, E. brunetti, E. tenella and E. acervulina were distributed all over Iran. They identified that E. mitis and E. brunetti for the first time by PCR (22). E. brunetti has been found uncommon in broiler flocks (15). This is in accordance with our finding in Khuzestan by PCR. E. necatrix has also been considered as uncommon in broiler flocks, but we identified this species in 11 samples of seven farms. In our study, E. tenella was the dominant species. This finding suggests that in poor management conditions, poultry houses may encounter acute coccidiosis in Khuzestan due to highly pathogenic species, E. tenella. Razmi et al, reported that prevalence of subclinical coccidiosis was 38% in Mashad, northeast of Iran and E. acervulina was the most prevalent species in broiler chicken farms (23). In north-west of Iran, Tabriz, five Eimeria spp., E. acervulina, E. tenella, E. necatrix, E. maxima and E. mitis, were identified by morphometric study and E. acervulina was the most prevalent species (23.58%) (24). Poor evaluation of parsitologic method to identify the Eimeria species has been reported by Anita Haug et al., previously. They reported that PCR and morphometric identification were in complete agreement in only 49% of the cases (25). The present study also showed that there was poor agreement between PCR and traditional identification for diagnosis of Eimeria species. However, there was a good agreement between PCR and morphometric diagnosis only for E. maxima. This finding can be due to the large size of the organism. Hence, as showed by low agreement with Kappa test, traditional methods are not sufficiently reliable for specific diagnosis of Eimeria species in chickens. Moreover, occurrence of multiple infections in a single bird and the fact that, Eimeria species with low oocysts frequency in the mixture maybe missed, indicates that PCR based amplification of DNA sequence of parasite, could resolve this problem and overcame the limitation in analysis of small amounts of oocysts in mixed infections. On the other hand, this protocol can even identify strains of Eimeria species, characterized by different drug-resistance phenotypes (15, 26). In conclusion, we believe that traditional methods are not sufficiently reliable for specific diagnosis of Eimeria species in chickens and PCR based amplification of DNA sequence of parasite, could resolve this problem.
  18 in total

1.  Single-strand restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of the second internal transcribed spacer (ribosomal DNA) for six species of Eimeria from chickens in Australia.

Authors:  W G Woods; K G Whithear; D G Richards; G R Anderson; W K Jorgensen; R B Gasser
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 3.981

2.  Cloning and nucleotide sequencing of the second internal transcribed spacer of ribosomal DNA for three species of Eimeria from chickens in Taiwan.

Authors:  Y Y Lien; S C Sheu; H J Liu; S C Chen; M Y Tsai; S C Luo; K C Wu; S S Liu; H Y Su
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 2.688

3.  Automated, fluorescence-based approach for the specific diagnosis of chicken coccidiosis.

Authors:  R B Gasser; W G Woods; J M Wood; L Ashdown; G Richards; K G Whithear
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.535

4.  Discrimination of eight chicken Eimeria species using the two-step polymerase chain reaction.

Authors:  N Tsuji; S Kawazu; M Ohta; T Kamio; T Isobe; K Shimura; K Fujisaki
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  PCR identification of chicken Eimeria: a simplified read-out.

Authors:  B E Schnitzler; P L Thebo; F M Tomley; A Uggla; M W Shirley
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.378

Review 6.  Problems in the identification of species of Eimeria.

Authors:  P L Long; L P Joyner
Journal:  J Protozool       Date:  1984-11

7.  Rapid and sensitive identification of Neospora caninum by in vitro amplification of the internal transcribed spacer 1.

Authors:  O J Holmdahl; J G Mattsson
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 3.234

8.  Eimeria tenella: characterization of a 5S ribosomal RNA repeat unit and its use as a species-specific probe.

Authors:  U Stucki; R Braun; I Roditi
Journal:  Exp Parasitol       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.011

9.  Differential diagnosis of five avian Eimeria species by polymerase chain reaction using primers derived from the internal transcribed spacer 1 (ITS-1) sequence.

Authors:  Yao-Chi Su; Andrew Chang-Young Fei; Fang-Mei Tsai
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 2.738

10.  Development of a diagnostic PCR assay for the detection and discrimination of four pathogenic .Eimeria species of the chicken.

Authors:  B E Schnitzler; P L Thebo; J G Mattsson; F M Tomley; M W Shirley
Journal:  Avian Pathol       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 3.378

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Diagnosis and control of chicken coccidiosis: a recent update.

Authors:  Abiodun Joseph Fatoba; Matthew Adekunle Adeleke
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2018-10-29

2.  Prevalence of Eimeria parasites in the Hubei and Henan provinces of China.

Authors:  Tiantian Geng; Cheng Ye; Zhenyu Lei; Bang Shen; Rui Fang; Min Hu; Junlong Zhao; Yanqin Zhou
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 2.289

3.  Prevalence of Eimeria species in domestic chickens in Anhui province, China.

Authors:  Yueyue Huang; Xiangchun Ruan; Lin Li; Minghua Zeng
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2017-05-22

4.  Biopathologic Characterization of Three Mixed Poultry Eimeria spp. Isolates.

Authors:  F Arabkhazaeli; S Nabian; M Modirsaneii; B Mansoori; S Rahbari
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.012

Review 5.  Chicken Coccidiosis: From the Parasite Lifecycle to Control of the Disease.

Authors:  Carolina Mesa-Pineda; Jeffer L Navarro-Ruíz; Sara López-Osorio; Jenny J Chaparro-Gutiérrez; Luis M Gómez-Osorio
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-12-21

6.  ITS1-PCR based identification of chicken Eimeria species in poultry litter from Mymensingh district, Bangladesh.

Authors:  Mohammad Zahangir Alam; Anita Rani Dey; Shanaz Parvin; Shirin Akter; Sharmin Aqter Rony
Journal:  J Adv Vet Anim Res       Date:  2021-09-20

7.  Cryptic Eimeria genotypes are common across the southern but not northern hemisphere.

Authors:  Emily L Clark; Sarah E Macdonald; V Thenmozhi; Krishnendu Kundu; Rajat Garg; Saroj Kumar; Simeon Ayoade; Kimberly M Fornace; Isa Danladi Jatau; Abdalgader Moftah; Matthew J Nolan; N R Sudhakar; A O Adebambo; I A Lawal; Ramón Álvarez Zapata; Joseph A Awuni; H David Chapman; Esron Karimuribo; Claire M Mugasa; Boniface Namangala; Jonathan Rushton; Xun Suo; Kumarasamy Thangaraj; Arni S R Srinivasa Rao; Anup K Tewari; Partha S Banerjee; G Dhinakar Raj; M Raman; Fiona M Tomley; Damer P Blake
Journal:  Int J Parasitol       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 3.981

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.