Literature DB >> 22347239

Incidence and Genetic Characterization of Gongylonema pulchrum in Cattle Slaughtered in Mazandaran Province, Northern Iran.

A Halajian1, A Eslami, N Salehi, J Ashrafi-Helan, H Sato.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The gullet worm, Gongylonema pulchrum Molin, 1857, is a thread-like spirurid nematode found in a variety of mammals worldwide. Its incidences in Iranian cattle of different breed or age have not been reported. The aims of the present study are to disclose the infection status of G. pulchrum in cattle slaughtered in northern region of Iran.
METHODS: Full-length esophagi of cattle of 97 native dairy breed and 41 Holstein-Friesian breed were collected at four local abattoirs in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran, from March 2006 to August 2007, and were examined parasitologically. Eight overlapping segments of the small- and large-subunits of rDNA were amplified by PCR, and the obtained nucleotide sequences were characterized.
RESULTS: The incidences of G. pulchrum in female and male native dairy breed were 38.9% and 24.0%, respectively, whereas those in female and male Holstein-Friesian breed were 4.2% and 0%, respectively. The first internal transcribed spacer (ITS1) region of G. pulchrum rDNA showed an intra-individual variation in the sequence and length, and the variation was ascribed to some unstable repeats of "A" or "CA".
CONCLUSION: Distinct incidences of G. pulchrum infection in native dairy breed and Holstein-Friesian breed might be ascribed to different animal husbandry manners for each breed in Iran; the former breed grazes freely in the pasture, but the latter breed is usually held in a pen. The rDNA sequence of Iranian G. pulchrum, obtained for the first time by us, might facilitate a reliable species identification of the parasite with a wide spectrum of morphological variations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cattle; Diagnosis; Gongylonema pulchrum; Iran; rDNA

Year:  2010        PMID: 22347239      PMCID: PMC3279837     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Parasitol        ISSN: 1735-7020            Impact factor:   1.012


Introduction

The gullet worm, Gongylonema pulchrum Molin, 1857, is a thread-like spirurid nematode found worldwide and in a variety of mammals such as sheep, goats, cattle, zebus, buffalo, camels, donkeys, cervids, pigs, equids, bears, rodents, and primates (1, 2). In Iran, this gullet worm has been reported in cattle (3, 4), sheep (5), buffalo, goats, wild boars (6), donkeys (7), and human beings (8). Anwar et al. (4) recorded G. pulchrum infection in 49.7% of 555 cattle slaughtered at the central Tehran abattoir in the 1970s. Eslami and Farsad-Hamdi (6) found G. pulchrum infection in 35% of 57 wild boars collected in the northern, northeastern, and southwestern parts of Iran. The aims of the present study are to disclose the infection status of G. pulchrum in cattle slaughtered in northern region of Iran, with special reference to incidences of G. pulchrum in cattle of different breed and age, and to characterize genetically the parasite collected in Iran for the first time.

Materials and Methods

Full-length esophagi of 138 cattle (97 native dairy breed and 41 Holstein-Friesian breed) were collected at four abattoirs in Mazandaran Province, northern Iran, from March 2006 to August 2007. These abattoirs were located in the Ramsar, Tonekabon, Chaloos, and Noshahr regions facing the Caspian Sea. Data on breed, sex, age, clinical condition, animal husbandry manner, and date of slaughter were recorded for each animal. The collected esophagi were brought to the Department of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Tehran Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran, and cut open longitudinally. After peeling the mucosal layers from the underlying tissues, the mucosal surface was carefully checked with the naked eye. The full length of each esophagus was divided into three equal parts (anterior, middle, and posterior), and the number of worms found in each part was recorded. Individual worms were carefully removed from the esophageal epithelium using fine forceps. The collected worms were relaxed in tap water, then fixed in 70% ethanol-5% glycerin solution. The esophageal tissue from some cases were fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formalin, and 5-µm thick paraffin sections were cut and stained with hematoxylin-eosin according to the standard technique. Six female and six male parasites fixed in alcohol-gylcerin solution were observed under a light microscope, and figures were drawn with the aid of a camera lucida. Measurements were performed on these drawn figures, using a digital curvimeter type S (Uchida Yoko, Tokyo, Japan) when necessary. The parasites used for morph-ological examination were deposited in the National Science Museum, Tokyo, Japan (Nos. NSNT-As 3501-3505). Following repeated washings in pure water, parasite DNA was extracted separately from two-fixed female G. pulchrum using an Illustra™ tissue & cells genomicPrep Mini Spin Kit (GE Healthcare UK, Buckinghamshire, UK) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. PCR amplification of overlapping rDNA fragments was performed (Fig. 1), using different primer combinations (Table 1) as described previously (9). PCR products for sequencing were purified using a High Pure PCR Cleanup Micro Kit (Roche Diagnostics GmbH, Mannheim, Germany). In addition to primers for amplifying, following primers were used for sequencing: segment 1, SSU9R (5'-AGCTGGAATTACCGCGGCTG-3'); segment 2, SSU24F (5'-AGAGGTGAAATTCGTGGACC-3' and 18S-1192R/20 (Table 1); and for segment 7, NLF1999/19 (5'-CCGCAKCAGGTCTCCAAG-3'), 28S-2132R/20 (5'AGAGGCTGTTCACCTTGGAG-3'), and NLR2362/20 (5'-ACATTCAGAGCACTGGGCAG-3'). After direct sequencing of PCR amplicons 9?, sequences were assembled manually with the aid of the CLUSTAL W multiple alignment program (10). For an rDNA segment containing the first and second internal transcribed spacer (ITS1 and ITS2) regions, the amplicon was cloned into a plasmid vector, pTA2 (Targe Clone™; TOYOBO, Osaka, Japan), and transformed into Escerichia coli JM109 (TOYOBO) according to the instructions of the manufacturer. Following propagation, plasmid DNA was extracted using a NucleoSpin® Plasmid kit (MACHEREY-NAGEL GmbH, Düren, Germany), and inserts from multiple independent clones were sequenced using universal M13 forward and reverse primers
Fig. 1

Schematic strategy to amplify and sequence the rDNA of Gongylonema pulchrum. Eight overlapping segments (shown here as numbered bar) were amplified using 8 primer combinations (Table 1), and sequenced by these primers for amplifying and additional primers for sequencing (see text). Small arrows show primers for sequencing. Any length shown here is not proportional to the substantial length of each rDNA region.

Table 1

Primers used to amplify 9 overlapping segments of rDNA of G. pulchrum

SegmentLength ofamplicon (bp)

No.ForwardReverse
1F-47(5'- CCCGATTGATTCTGTCGGC-3')SSU22F18S-1192R/20 (5'-CAGGTGAGTTTTCCCGTGTT-3')1,211
2(5'-TCCAAGGAAGGCAGCAGGC-3')SSU23FNSR1787/18 (5'-CGACGGGCGGTGTGTACA-3')1,230
3(5'-ATTCCGATAACGAGCGAGACT-3')NC5(ITS1)/FNC13(ITS1)/R (5'-GCTGCGTTCTTCATCGAT-3')918–929
4(5'- AGGTGAACCTGCGGAAGGATCATT-3')28S/F28S-408R/20 (5'-TTCACGCCCTCTTGAACTCT-3')1,202–1,213
5(5'-AGCGGAGGAAAAGAAACTAA-3')28S-839F/2028S-1270R/22 (5'-CAGCTATCCTGAGGGAAACTTC-3')1,191
6(5'-TATCCGACCCGTCTTGAAAC-3')28S-1449F/2728S-1670R/20 (5'-TACCACCAAGATCTGCACCA-3')955
7(5'-GAAGTCGGAATCCGCTAAGGAGTGTG-3')NLF2551/21NLR2781/19 (5'-CCGCCCCAGYCAAACTCCC-3')1,537
8(5'-GGGAAAGAAGACCCTGTTGAG-3')NLR3284/21 (5'-TTCTGACTTAGAGGCGTTCAG-3')749
Schematic strategy to amplify and sequence the rDNA of Gongylonema pulchrum. Eight overlapping segments (shown here as numbered bar) were amplified using 8 primer combinations (Table 1), and sequenced by these primers for amplifying and additional primers for sequencing (see text). Small arrows show primers for sequencing. Any length shown here is not proportional to the substantial length of each rDNA region. Primers used to amplify 9 overlapping segments of rDNA of G. pulchrum The relationships between the infection rate and several parameters related to the examined cattle were assessed by the contingency table method and regression analysis using commercially available statistical software (StatView® ver.5; SAS Institute Inc., North Carolina, USA). A P value less than 0.05 denoted statistical significance.

Results

The recovery of G. pulchrum from 138 cattle (97 native dairy breed and 41 Holstein-Friesian breed) is shown in (Table 2). Only a single female Holstein-Friesian breed was infected with G. pulchrum, whereas 38.9% (28 of 72) female and 24.0% (6 of 25) male native dairy cattle were infected with the gullet worm. The incidence of the gullet worm in native dairy breed, particularly female cattle, was positively correlated with the host age (P<0.05). The gullet worms were collected in 25.9% (7 of 27) of cattle in winter, 58.3% (7 of 12) of cattle in spring, 33.3% (5 of 15) of cattle in summer, and 34.9% (15 of 43) of cattle in autumn. The incidences of the gullet worms in native dairy breed were not different by sex and season. Worm recovery ranged from 1 to 24, and the geomean was 2.3 in female and 1.6 in male native dairy cattle. In total, 26 worms were collected from the anterior, 41 worms from the middle, and 47 worms from the posterior part of the esophagus of native dairy cattle. All 4 worms were collected from the posterior part of the esophagus of the single G. pulchrum-infected Holstein-Friesian breed.
Table 2

Recovery of Gongylonema pulchrumfrom the esophagus of cattle in Iran*

Approximate age of animals (years)
1234≥5Total
Holstein-Friesian breed
 Female
  Number of animals examined3766224
  Number of infected animals000101
  Incidence (%)00016.704.2
  Intensity000404
 Male
  Number of animals examined02132017
  Number of infected animals000000
  Incidence (%)000000
  Intensity000000
 Breed total
  Number of animals examined39198241
  Number of infected animals000101
  Incidence (%)00012.502.4
Native dairy breed
 Female
  Number of animals examined51214261572
  Number of infected animals02581328
  Incidence (%)016.735.730.886.738.9
  Intensity03 & 241.1 (1–2)2.2 (1–11)2.5 (1–9)2.3 (1–24)
 Male
  Number of animals examined43115225
  Number of infected animals212106
  Incidence (%)50.033.318.220.0024.0
Intensity1 & 411 & 2201.6 (1–4)
Breed total
  Number of animals examined91525311797
  Number of infected animals23791334
  Incidence (%)22.220.028.029.076.535.1

Intensity is expressed as mean of worm recovery (range, when available).

Recovery of Gongylonema pulchrumfrom the esophagus of cattle in Iran* Intensity is expressed as mean of worm recovery (range, when available). Morphological examination of the collected worms showed characteristic cephalic and caudal morphologies of G. pulchrum (Fig. 2), and the measurements of 6 worms of each sex are shown in Table 3. Histological examination detected mild local inflammation around the worm trail, but not directly around the worms, in the epithelial layers and the lamina propria, along with local acantholysis and hyperkeratosis.
Fig. 2

Anterior end of female Gongylonema pulchrum from a cattle in Iran. (A) Low power view of the anterior end showing a whole length of esophagus. EP, Excretory pore; GE, end of grandular esophagus; ME, end of muscular esophagus; and NR, nerve ring. (B) High power view of the anterior end showing cervical lateral papilla (CP) and prominent cuticular plaques irregularly arranged in longitudinal rows.

Table 3

Comparison of measurements of Gongylonema pulchrum collected from cattle (in mm)

Sex of wormsMale
LocalityIranNorthern part of Japan
ReferenceThe present studyBaylis, 1925 (11)Kudo et al., 1992 (12)
Number of worms examined6?60
Body length36.7–48.6 (41.9±4.8)12–6224.1–52.4
Max. body width0.22–0.26 (0.24±0.02)0.14–0.360.208–0.296
Pharynx0.045–0.056 (0.048±0.005)0.040–0.0750.042–0.066
Length of esophagus4.96–6.08 (5.58±0.43)3.0–7.04.89–7.44
  Muscular portion0.55–0.65 (0.61±0.04)0.40–0.780.478–0.697
  Glandular portion4.40–5.47 (4.97±0.43)4.35–6.78
Cervical lateral papillae*0.134–0.171 (0.150±0.013)0.075–0.190.116–0.186
Nerve ring*0.266–0.322 (0.298±0.020)0.29–0.350.264–0.352
Excretory pore*0.495–0.599 (0.537±0.039)0.30–0.650.408–0.616
Left spicule10.60–27.86 (18.87±6.46)4.0–23.011.1–22.7
Right spicule0.137–0.168 (0.157±0.014)0.084–0.180.118–0.160
Gubernaculum0.109–0.140 (0.130±0.018)0.07–0.120.106–0.142
Number of precloacal papillae5—65—7
Number of postcloacal papillae5—65—6
Tail length0.172–0.336 (0.275±0.062)0.22–0.350.240–0.376


Sex of wormsFemale
LocalityIranNorthern part of Japan
ReferenceThe present studyBaylis, 1925 (11)Kudo et al., 1992 (12)
Number of worms examined6?60

Body length68.5–107.3 (82.4±14.4)37–14546.0–111.5
Max. body width0.29–0.38 (0.32±0.04)0.19–0.530.272–0.424
Pharynx0.045–0.064 (0.055±0.007)0.040–0.0750.044–0.073
Length of esophagus6.46–8.39 (7.58±0.72)6.0–9.05.80–9.46
  Muscular portion0.63–0.88 (0.80±0.10)0.48–0.950.576–0.936
  Glandular portion5.83–7.52 (6.77±0.63)5.20–8.60
Cervical lateral papillae*0.168–0.224 (0.189±0.020)0.13–0.22
Nerve ring*0.324–0.453 (0.382±0.049)0.25–0.40
Excretory pore*0.632–0.862 (0.743±0.087)0.46–0.90
Vulva**2.69–5.18 (3.63±0.96)1.95–7.01.97–6.06
Tail length0.246–0.414 (0.307±0.058)0.19–0.380.202–0.380
Egg0.058–0.060 (0.059±0.001)×0.032–0.034 (0.033±0.001)0.050–0.070×0.025–0.0370.050–0.063×0.032–0.038

From the anterior end.

From the posterior end.

Anterior end of female Gongylonema pulchrum from a cattle in Iran. (A) Low power view of the anterior end showing a whole length of esophagus. EP, Excretory pore; GE, end of grandular esophagus; ME, end of muscular esophagus; and NR, nerve ring. (B) High power view of the anterior end showing cervical lateral papilla (CP) and prominent cuticular plaques irregularly arranged in longitudinal rows. Comparison of measurements of Gongylonema pulchrum collected from cattle (in mm) From the anterior end. From the posterior end. Except for approximately 20 nucleotides corresponding to the 5'-end of SSU rDNA, the rest of its sequence (1,782 bp in length), ITS1, 5.8S rDNA, ITS2, and more than 3,500-bp long 28S rDNA sequences were determined in this study (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession no. ). The ITS1 showed an intra-individual variation in the sequence and length (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession nos. ). The variations in length of ITS1, from 378-bp to 389-bp, was ascribed to some unstable repeats of "A" (11 to 14 times) or "CA" (3 to 8 times). Except for the ITS1 region, the rDNA sequence of G. pulchrum in cattle in Iran was identical with those of the parasite in cattle in Japan (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession nos. ).

Discussion

Morphological characters of the collected worms by us are identical to G. pulchrum described in previous reports (11–13). Distributions of G. pulchrum with high incidences have been fairly well documented in a variety of domestic and wild mammals in Iran (4, 6, 7). In addition, one human case has been reported in this country (8). As previously suggested by these reports, the present study has also confirmed a high prevalence of G. pulchrum infection in Iran. As shown in a report from Japan, the ages of examined cattle apparently affect the incidence of G. pulchrum infection. Kudo et al. (12) reported the incidence at 3.3% (8 of 242) in cattle 2 years old or younger, 17.0% (40 of 235) in cattle 3 years old, and 60.0% (57 of 94) in cattle 4 years old or older. In this study, accumulation of G. pulchrum parasitism by age was evident particularly in female native dairy cattle in Iran, which graze freely in the pasture. In contrast, pen-held Holstein-Friesian breed might have less opportunity to be infected with G. pulchrum. Due to the accidental occurrence of G. pulchrum infection in humans, when frequently only a fragment of the parasite is recovered for the causative species identification (8, 14–16), and a stunted development of the parasite in non-bovine hosts (17–20), or a wide spectrum of its morphological variations by hosts exists (21), the molecular-based diagnosis of the species might be convenient and accurate. The rDNA of G. pulchrum or any other members of the family Gongylonematidae, however, have not been sequenced to date. We have presented, for the first time, approximately 6,100-bp long rDNA sequences of G. pulchrum in the present study (DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank accession no. -). Furthermore, we noticed no geographical variations in the rDNA sequences except for the ITS1 region between G. pulchrum isolated from cattle in Iran and Japan. This rDNA-based diagnosis of the species may facilitate the reliable identification of G. pulchrum even under limitation of sampling for morphological species diagnosis. Further, the complicated taxonomy of members of the genus Gongylonema (1, 2) would be solved after accumulation of rDNA datasets of members of the genus. We believe, for a long time, that G. pulchrum takes a wide spectrum of mammals as natural hosts, and domestic and wild mammals share the transmission cycle by an accidental ingestion of the intermediate host, dung beetles. Our study in progress attempts to disclose the transmission dynamics or epidemiology of G. pulchrum between domestic and wild mammals using mitochondrial DNA markers, which is relevant to detect inraspecific polymorphism (22), and find a possibility that diverse genotypes of G. pulchrum may be prevalent in different mammalian groups.
  16 in total

1.  Gongylonema infection of the mouth in a resident of Cambridge, Massachusetts.

Authors:  M E Wilson; C A Lorente; J E Allen; M L Eberhard
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-04-09       Impact factor: 9.079

2.  Identification and characterization of the threadworm, Strongyloides procyonis, from feral raccoons (Procyon lotor) in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sato; Kazuo Suzuki; Arihiro Osanai; Haruo Kamiya; Hidefumi Furuoka
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.276

3.  Molecular phylogeny of clade III nematodes reveals multiple origins of tissue parasitism.

Authors:  S A Nadler; R A Carreno; H Mejía-Madrid; J Ullberg; C Pagan; R Houston; J-P Hugot
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2007-05-17       Impact factor: 3.234

4.  A note on the occurrence of Gongylonema pulchrum Molin, 1857, in man in Ceylon.

Authors:  H CRUSZ; V SIVALINGAM
Journal:  J Parasitol       Date:  1950-02       Impact factor: 1.276

5.  Database on the structure of small subunit ribosomal RNA.

Authors:  Y Van de Peer; E Robbrecht; S de Hoog; A Caers; P De Rijk; R De Wachter
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

6.  CLUSTAL W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice.

Authors:  J D Thompson; D G Higgins; T J Gibson
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1994-11-11       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Human Gongylonema infection in a resident of New York City.

Authors:  M L Eberhard; C Busillo
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.345

8.  High incidence of the gullet worm, Gongylonema pulchrum, in a squirrel monkey colony in a zoological garden in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroshi Sato; Yumi Une; Mariko Takada
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 2.738

9.  Human Gongylonema infection in Iran.

Authors:  G H Molavi; J Massoud; Y Gutierrez
Journal:  J Helminthol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.170

10.  Helminth parasites of wild boar, Sus scrofa, in Iran.

Authors:  A Eslami; S Farsad-Hamdi
Journal:  J Wildl Dis       Date:  1992-04       Impact factor: 1.535

View more
  7 in total

1.  Human Gongylonema pulchrum Infection: Esophageal Symptoms and Need for Prolonged Albendazole Therapy.

Authors:  Claudia R Libertin; Mohammed Reza; Joy H Peterson; Jason Lewis; D Jane Hata
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 2.345

2.  Gongylonema pulchrum infection in a resident of Williamsburg, Virginia, verified by genetic analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan D Allen; Aurora Esquela-Kerscher
Journal:  Am J Trop Med Hyg       Date:  2013-08-19       Impact factor: 2.345

3.  Molecular genetic diversity of Gongylonema neoplasticum (Fibiger & Ditlevsen, 1914) (Spirurida: Gongylonematidae) from rodents in Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Aogu Setsuda; Alexis Ribas; Kittipong Chaisiri; Serge Morand; Monidarin Chou; Fidelino Malbas; Muchammad Yunus; Hiroshi Sato
Journal:  Syst Parasitol       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 1.431

4.  Intraspecific and interspecific genetic variation of Gongylonema pulchrum and two rodent Gongylonema spp. (G. aegypti and G. neoplasticum), with the proposal of G. nepalensis n. sp. for the isolate in water buffaloes from Nepal.

Authors:  Aogu Setsuda; Nengtai Da; Hideo Hasegawa; Jerzy M Behnke; Hari Bahadur Rana; Ishwari Prasad Dhakal; Hiroshi Sato
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Molecular and phylogenetic study on Toxocara vitulorum from cattle in the mid-Delta of Egypt.

Authors:  Khaled Sultan; Mosaab Omar; Abdelrazek Y Desouky; Mahmoud A El-Seify
Journal:  J Parasit Dis       Date:  2013-11-19

6.  Prevalence and Seasonality of Adult and Arrested Larvae of Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Sheep from Mashhad City, Northeastern Iran.

Authors:  Abbas Jadidoleslami; Abolghasem Siyadatpanah; Hassan Borji; Mehdi Zarean; Lida Jarahi; Elham Moghaddas; Christine M Budke
Journal:  Iran J Parasitol       Date:  2022 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.217

Review 7.  Parasitic diseases of equids in Iran (1931-2020): a literature review.

Authors:  Alireza Sazmand; Aliasghar Bahari; Sareh Papi; Domenico Otranto
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 3.876

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.