Literature DB >> 22346549

Noninvasive screening for genital chlamydial infections in asymptomatic men: Strategies and costs using a urine PCR assay.

R W Peeling1, B Toye, P Jessamine, I Gemmill.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate cost saving strategies to screen for genital chlamydial infection in men using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) technology.
METHODS: Men with no urethral symptoms presenting to a sexually transmitted disease (STD) clinic were recruited. Study participants underwent a questionnaire interview. Urethral swabs were taken to perform a smear for polymorphonuclear leucocytes (PMN) and for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by culture and PCR. First-catch urine was collected for a leukocyte esterase test (LET) and PCR.
RESULTS: C trachomatis infection was detected in 36 of 463 (7.8%) men. LET and PMN were positive in 10 (28%) and 12 (33%) infected men, respectively. Risk factors for chlamydial infection were younger than age 25 years, LET-positive, PMN-positive and STD contact (P<0.001). The direct cost of genital chlamydial infection in men in Canada has been previously estimated at $381/case. Based on a sensitivity of 90% for urine PCR, the estimated direct cost of testing all participants to detect 32 cases was $453/case. Using risk factors recommended in the Canadian STD Guidelines (age younger than 25 years, new partner, STD contact or unprotected sex), the same number of cases would have been detected by testing only 384 men at $376/case. Using age younger than 25 years or STD contact as the screening criterion, 78% of those infected would have been detected at $259/case, and no new cases would have been detected by adding LET-positive or PMN-positive as risk factors.
CONCLUSION: Targeted screening for chlamydial infection using urine PCR assay and risk factors recommended in the Canadian guidelines could substantially reduce the cost of screening at a STD clinic setting. LET and PMN smear did not appear to be useful indicators of chlamydial infection in this population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chlamydia trachomatis; Costs; Polymerase chain reaction; Screening

Year:  1998        PMID: 22346549      PMCID: PMC3250916          DOI: 10.1155/1998/286027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1180-2332


  33 in total

Review 1.  Molecular techniques for the laboratory identification of Chlamydia trachomatis.

Authors:  R W Peeling; R C Brunham
Journal:  J Int Fed Clin Chem       Date:  1994-06

2.  Surrogate methods to diagnose gonococcal and chlamydial cervicitis: comparison of leukocyte esterase dipstick, endocervical gram stain, and culture.

Authors:  C R Knud-Hansen; G A Dallabetta; C Reichart; K M Pabst; E W Hook; J N Wasserheit
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  1991 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.830

3.  Screening urine samples by leukocyte esterase test and ligase chain reaction for chlamydial infections among asymptomatic men.

Authors:  G Anestad; B P Berdal; O Scheel; R Mundal; O Odinsen; K Skaug; O S Khalil; P Plier; H Lee
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Comparison among performances of a ligase chain reaction-based assay and two enzyme immunoassays in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men with nongonococcal urethritis.

Authors:  T Deguchi; M Yasuda; M Uno; K Tada; H Iwata; H Komeda; S Maeda; V Latila; I Saito; Y Kawada
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Unsatisfactory performance of the leukocyte esterase test of first voided urine for rapid diagnosis of urethritis.

Authors:  D M Patrick; M L Rekart; L Knowles
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-06

6.  Leukocyte esterase urine strips for the screening of men with urethritis--use in developing countries.

Authors:  M W Tyndall; J Nasio; G Maitha; J O Ndinya-Achola; F A Plummer; J W Sellors; K E Luinstra; D Jang; J B Mahony; M A Chernesky
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-02

7.  Factors affecting urine EIA sensitivity in the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in men.

Authors:  H Talbot; B Romanowski
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1994-04

8.  Development and evaluation of screening strategies for Chlamydia trachomatis infections in an STD clinic.

Authors:  Y T van Duynhoven; M J van de Laar; J S Fennema; G J van Doornum; J A van den Hoek
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1995-12

9.  Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics.

Authors:  T C Quinn; L Welsh; A Lentz; K Crotchfelt; J Zenilman; J Newhall; C Gaydos
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Factors associated with genital chlamydial and gonococcal infection in males.

Authors:  G Hart
Journal:  Genitourin Med       Date:  1993-10
View more
  2 in total

Review 1.  One to one interventions to reduce sexually transmitted infections and under the age of 18 conceptions: a systematic review of the economic evaluations.

Authors:  L Barham; D Lewis; N Latimer
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 3.519

Review 2.  Screening for Chlamydia trachomatis: a systematic review of the economic evaluations and modelling.

Authors:  T E Roberts; S Robinson; P Barton; S Bryan; N Low
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.519

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.