Literature DB >> 22346520

Economic benefits of a routine second dose of combined measles, mumps and rubella vaccine in Canada.

M Rivière1, R Tretiak, C Levinton, C Fitzsimon, C Leclerc.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the potential economic benefits of a program for a second routine dose of combined measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine, administered to children in Canada.
DESIGN: Both published and unpublished data from the United States and Canada were incorporated into a linear model. This information was supplemented with opinions on probability and resource use from interviews with a Canadian panel of physicians and practitioners. The province of Quebec was used as a model for resource use and costs.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: Data were based on a vaccination program for Canadian children at 18 months, with an estimated annual birth cohort of 400,000. Further data were also collected for the lifetime costs of complications arising from these diseases or from vaccination, for both patients and family caregivers. OUTCOME MEASURES: Outcomes were reviewed from the perspectives of a provincial ministry of health (direct medical costs) and of society (all direct and indirect medical and nonmedical costs).
RESULTS: It was estimated that a second dose of MMR vaccine administered at 18 months of age would prevent 9200 cases of measles, 6120 cases of mumps and 1960 cases of rubella, producing a savings of $6.34 for every dollar spent from the ministry of health perspective, and $3.25 from the societal perspective.
CONCLUSIONS: A routine second dose immunization with MMR vaccine would result in considerable cost savings in Canada.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Benefit-cost; Economics; Measles; Mumps; Rubella; Second dose vaccine

Year:  1997        PMID: 22346520      PMCID: PMC3250895          DOI: 10.1155/1997/215175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Infect Dis        ISSN: 1180-2332


  14 in total

Review 1.  Rational use of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) vaccine.

Authors:  H Carter; H Campbell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Mumps--United States, 1985-1988.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1989-02-24       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 3.  Measles control in developing and developed countries: the case for a two-dose policy.

Authors:  T H Tulchinsky; G M Ginsberg; Y Abed; M T Angeles; C Akukwe; J Bonn
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Persistence of measles antibody after revaccination.

Authors:  L E Markowitz; P Albrecht; W A Orenstein; S M Lett; T J Pugliese; D Farrell
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 5.226

5.  The elimination of indigenous measles, mumps, and rubella from Finland by a 12-year, two-dose vaccination program.

Authors:  H Peltola; O P Heinonen; M Valle; M Paunio; M Virtanen; V Karanko; K Cantell
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-11-24       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Increase in rubella and congenital rubella syndrome--United States, 1988-1990.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1991-02-15       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Benefits, risks and costs of immunization for measles, mumps and rubella.

Authors:  C C White; J P Koplan; W A Orenstein
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated school population. Evidence for large-scale vaccination failure.

Authors:  J E Cheek; R Baron; H Atlas; D L Wilson; R D Crider
Journal:  Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  1995-07

Review 9.  Measles control in the United States: problems of the past and challenges for the future.

Authors:  D L Wood; P A Brunell
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 26.132

10.  National goals and objectives for the control of vaccine-preventable diseases of infants and children.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Commun Dis Rep       Date:  1995-03-30
View more
  6 in total

1.  Economic evaluation of a new acellular vaccine for pertussis in Canada.

Authors:  M Iskedjian; T R Einarson; B J O'Brien; J G De Serres; R Gold; I M Gemmill; N Milkovich; A Rosner
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  The effectiveness of measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccination in the prevention of pediatric hospitalizations for targeted and untargeted infections: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Giuseppe La Torre; Rosella Saulle; Brigid Unim; Angela Meggiolaro; Angelo Barbato; Alice Mannocci; Antonietta Spadea
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2017-06-12       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Close the gap for routine mumps vaccination in Japan.

Authors:  Taito Kitano
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Economic evaluations of vaccines in Canada: a scoping review.

Authors:  Ellen R S Rafferty; Heather L Gagnon; Marwa Farag; Cheryl L Waldner
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2017-05-05

5.  Dynamic transmission model of routine mumps vaccination in Japan.

Authors:  Taito Kitano
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 2.451

Review 6.  Global trends in measles publications.

Authors:  Rachel Kornbluh; Robert Davis
Journal:  Pan Afr Med J       Date:  2020-02-20
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.