Literature DB >> 22950901

Gene network-based cancer prognosis analysis with sparse boosting.

Shuangge Ma1, Yuan Huang, Jian Huang, Kuangnan Fang.   

Abstract

High-throughput gene profiling studies have been extensively conducted, searching for markers associated with cancer development and progression. In this study, we analyse cancer prognosis studies with right censored survival responses. With gene expression data, we adopt the weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) to describe the interplay among genes. In network analysis, nodes represent genes. There are subsets of nodes, called modules, which are tightly connected to each other. Genes within the same modules tend to have co-regulated biological functions. For cancer prognosis data with gene expression measurements, our goal is to identify cancer markers, while properly accounting for the network module structure. A two-step sparse boosting approach, called Network Sparse Boosting (NSBoost), is proposed for marker selection. In the first step, for each module separately, we use a sparse boosting approach for within-module marker selection and construct module-level 'super markers'. In the second step, we use the super markers to represent the effects of all genes within the same modules and conduct module-level selection using a sparse boosting approach. Simulation study shows that NSBoost can more accurately identify cancer-associated genes and modules than alternatives. In the analysis of breast cancer and lymphoma prognosis studies, NSBoost identifies genes with important biological implications. It outperforms alternatives including the boosting and penalization approaches by identifying a smaller number of genes/modules and/or having better prediction performance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22950901      PMCID: PMC3573352          DOI: 10.1017/S0016672312000419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res (Camb)        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  26 in total

1.  Boosting for tumor classification with gene expression data.

Authors:  Marcel Dettling; Peter Bühlmann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2003-06-12       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  Identification of cancer genomic markers via integrative sparse boosting.

Authors:  Yuan Huang; Jian Huang; Ben-Chang Shia; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2011-10-31       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R.

Authors:  Peter Langfelder; Bin Zhang; Steve Horvath
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  Functional analysis of the nuclear LIM domain interactor NLI.

Authors:  L W Jurata; G N Gill
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.272

5.  The proliferation gene expression signature is a quantitative integrator of oncogenic events that predicts survival in mantle cell lymphoma.

Authors:  Andreas Rosenwald; George Wright; Adrian Wiestner; Wing C Chan; Joseph M Connors; Elias Campo; Randy D Gascoyne; Thomas M Grogan; H Konrad Muller-Hermelink; Erlend B Smeland; Michael Chiorazzi; Jena M Giltnane; Elaine M Hurt; Hong Zhao; Lauren Averett; Sarah Henrickson; Liming Yang; John Powell; Wyndham H Wilson; Elaine S Jaffe; Richard Simon; Richard D Klausner; Emilio Montserrat; Francesc Bosch; Timothy C Greiner; Dennis D Weisenburger; Warren G Sanger; Bhavana J Dave; James C Lynch; Julie Vose; James O Armitage; Richard I Fisher; Thomas P Miller; Michael LeBlanc; German Ott; Stein Kvaloy; Harald Holte; Jan Delabie; Louis M Staudt
Journal:  Cancer Cell       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 31.743

6.  The Sparse Laplacian Shrinkage Estimator for High-Dimensional Regression.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Shuangge Ma; Hongzhe Li; Cun-Hui Zhang
Journal:  Ann Stat       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 4.028

7.  Hypoxia-inducible adenosine A2B receptor modulates proliferation of colon carcinoma cells.

Authors:  De-Fu Ma; Tetsuo Kondo; Tadao Nakazawa; Dong-Feng Niu; Kunio Mochizuki; Tomonori Kawasaki; Tetsu Yamane; Ryohei Katoh
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  [Expression of early placenta insulin-like growth factor (EPIL) in breast cancer cells provides an autocrine loop with enhancement of predominantly HER-2-related invasivity].

Authors:  H Bürger; D Kemming; M Helms; U Feldmann; A Matuschek; W Böcker; B Brandt
Journal:  Verh Dtsch Ges Pathol       Date:  2005

9.  Incorporating higher-order representative features improves prediction in network-based cancer prognosis analysis.

Authors:  Shuangge Ma; Michael R Kosorok; Jian Huang; Ying Dai
Journal:  BMC Med Genomics       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.063

10.  Decreased serum levels of carboxylesterase-2 in patients with ovarian cancer.

Authors:  Liying Cai; Xiaobo Tang; Lei Guo; Yuan An; Yuguang Wang; Jianhua Zheng
Journal:  Tumori       Date:  2009 Jul-Aug
View more
  9 in total

1.  An integrative sparse boosting analysis of cancer genomic commonality and difference.

Authors:  Yifan Sun; Zhengyang Sun; Yu Jiang; Yang Li; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 3.021

2.  Incorporating network structure in integrative analysis of cancer prognosis data.

Authors:  Jin Liu; Jian Huang; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2012-11-17       Impact factor: 2.135

3.  Promoting similarity of model sparsity structures in integrative analysis of cancer genetic data.

Authors:  Yuan Huang; Jin Liu; Huangdi Yi; Ben-Chang Shia; Shuangge Ma
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-09-25       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  Visual gene-network analysis reveals the cancer gene co-expression in human endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Wei-Chun Chou; An-Lin Cheng; Marco Brotto; Chun-Yu Chuang
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 3.969

5.  Pathway-Based Kernel Boosting for the Analysis of Genome-Wide Association Studies.

Authors:  Stefanie Friedrichs; Juliane Manitz; Patricia Burger; Christopher I Amos; Angela Risch; Jenny Chang-Claude; Heinz-Erich Wichmann; Thomas Kneib; Heike Bickeböller; Benjamin Hofner
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 2.238

6.  A Systemic Analysis of Transcriptomic and Epigenomic Data To Reveal Regulation Patterns for Complex Disease.

Authors:  Chao Xu; Ji-Gang Zhang; Dongdong Lin; Lan Zhang; Hui Shen; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2017-07-05       Impact factor: 3.154

7.  Identify clear cell renal cell carcinoma related genes by gene network.

Authors:  Fangrong Yan; Yue Wang; Chunhui Liu; Huiling Zhao; Liya Zhang; Xiaofan Lu; Chen Chen; Yaoyan Wang; Tao Lu; Fei Wang
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-30

8.  Gene co-expression network reveals shared modules predictive of stage and grade in serous ovarian cancers.

Authors:  Qian Sun; Haiyue Zhao; Cong Zhang; Ting Hu; Jianli Wu; Xingguang Lin; Danfeng Luo; Changyu Wang; Li Meng; Ling Xi; Kezhen Li; Junbo Hu; Ding Ma; Tao Zhu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-27

9.  The 'dnet' approach promotes emerging research on cancer patient survival.

Authors:  Hai Fang; Julian Gough
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 11.117

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.