Literature DB >> 22343180

Randomized trial of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision with removal at one to three weeks: delayed removal leads to detachment.

Mark A Barone1, Quentin D Awori, Philip S Li, Raymond O Simba, Mark A Weaver, Jairus O Okech, Alex O Aduda, Peter Cherutich, Nicholas Muraguri, John Masasabi Wekesa, Jared Nyanchoka, Paul Perchal, Puneet Masson, Richard Lee, Marc Goldstein, Jackson Kioko, Ojwang' Lusi, David C Sokal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To assess healing with Shang Ring removal at different prespecified times; whether spontaneous detachment occurs with delayed removal; problems, complaints, and acceptability of wearing the device; satisfaction among participants; and acceptability of the procedure among providers.
METHODS: Fifty HIV-negative men underwent a Shang Ring circumcision in Kenya. Men were randomly assigned for device removal at 7 (15 men), 14 (15 men), or 21 days (20 men). Follow-up visits were at 7, 14, 21, 28, and 42 days after circumcision and 2 days after removal.
RESULTS: Circumcision and device removal were conducted without significant problems. Mean times for circumcision and device removal were 6.5 (SD = 2.4) and 2.5 (SD = 0.8) minutes, respectively. Complete detachment of the device occurred in 22 (66.7%) men who wore it more than 7 days. Seven men (14.0%) with partial detachments requested removal 8-14 days postcircumcision due to pain/discomfort. Healing progressed normally in all participants; cumulative probabilities of complete healing were similar across groups. No severe or serious adverse events occurred. Acceptability among participants was high. Providers reported that Shang Ring circumcision was "very easy" compared with the forceps-guided procedure.
CONCLUSION: The Shang Ring is safe and easy to use according to label instructions (7 day removal). Detachments occurred without significant problems, although some men requested removal of partially detached rings. Removal time had little effect on healing. These data help allay concerns about men not returning for ring removal and expand the evidence base suggesting the Shang Ring could facilitate rapid male circumcision rollout in sub-Saharan Africa.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22343180     DOI: 10.1097/QAI.0b013e31824ea1f2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr        ISSN: 1525-4135            Impact factor:   3.731


  17 in total

1.  Simple circumcision device: proof of concept for a single-visit, adjustable device to facilitate safe adult male circumcision.

Authors:  James M Hotaling; Laura S Leddy; Mahum A Haider; Matthew Mossanen; Michael R Bailey; Brian MacConaghy; Francis Olson; John N Krieger
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Authors' reply: Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.

Authors:  Samuel Kanyago; David M Riding; Mark J Siedner
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

3.  Proper surgical training and grading of complications for Shang Ring circumcision are necessary.

Authors:  Richard Lee; E Charles Osterberg; Philip S Li; Marc Goldstein; Mark Barone; Stephanie L Combes; David Sokal; Ron Gray; Godfrey Kigozi; Stephen Watya
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 3.731

4.  The acceptability and safety of the Shang Ring for adult male circumcision in Rakai, Uganda.

Authors:  Godfrey Kigozi; Richard Musoke; Stephen Watya; Nehemiah Kighoma; Paschal Ssebbowa; David Serwadda; Fred Nalugoda; Frederick Makumbi; Philip Li; Richard Lee; Marc Goldstein; Maria Wawer; Nelson Sewankambo; Ronald H Gray
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.731

5.  Lower HIV Risk Among Circumcised Men Who Have Sex With Men in China: Interaction With Anal Sex Role in a Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Han-Zhu Qian; Yuhua Ruan; Yu Liu; Douglas F Milam; Hans M L Spiegel; Lu Yin; Dongliang Li; Bryan E Shepherd; Yiming Shao; Sten H Vermund
Journal:  J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr       Date:  2016-04-01       Impact factor: 3.731

Review 6.  Voluntary medical male circumcision in resource-constrained settings.

Authors:  Aaron A R Tobian; Tigistu Adamu; Jason B Reed; Valerian Kiggundu; Youseph Yazdi; Emmanuel Njeuhmeli
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  Identifying and addressing barriers to uptake of voluntary medical male circumcision in Nyanza, Kenya among men 18-35: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Emily Evens; Michele Lanham; Catherine Hart; Mores Loolpapit; Isaac Oguma; Walter Obiero
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Safety of adult medical male circumcision performed by non-physician clinicians in Kenya: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Vera Frajzyngier; George Odingo; Mark Barone; Paul Perchal; Melinda Pavin
Journal:  Glob Health Sci Pract       Date:  2014-01-09

9.  The PrePex device is unlikely to achieve cost-savings compared to the forceps-guided method in male circumcision programs in sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Walter Obiero; Marisa R Young; Robert C Bailey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Clinical trials using the Shang Ring device for male circumcision in Africa: a review.

Authors:  Mark A Barone; Philip S Li; Quentin D Awori; Richard Lee; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.