Literature DB >> 22342993

Twenty-five year outcomes of tricuspid valve replacement comparing mechanical and biologic prostheses.

Andrea Garatti1, Giovanni Nano, Giuseppe Bruschi, Alberto Canziani, Tiziano Colombo, Alessandro Frigiola, Luigi Martinelli, Lorenzo Menicanti.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Tricuspid valve replacement (TVR) has historically been associated with high mortality and morbidity, and current knowledge of long-term results of TVR is limited. This study reviewed our experience from a consecutive series at 2 institutions.
METHODS: Ninety patients (65 women [72%]; mean age, 53.8 ± 14.2 years; mean body surface area, 1.6 ± 0.2 m(2)) underwent TVR between January 1980 and December 2005. The etiology was secondary to left-heart valve disease in 56 patients (62%), degenerative disease in 16 (18%), Ebstein anomaly in 7 (8%), and endocarditis in 11 (12%). Seventy patients (78%) were in New York Heart Association class III or IV. Sixty patients (67%) underwent redo procedures. TVR was with a mechanical valve in 46 patients (51%) and a biologic prosthesis in 44 (49%).
RESULTS: The overall operative mortality was 17.7% (16 patients). During follow-up, 16 of the 74 survivors died. Kaplan-Meier survival at 5, 10, and 15 years was, respectively, 72%, 65%, and 63%. During follow-up, 16 patients (21.6%) underwent reoperation; among them, 8 with a mechanical valve underwent reoperation for tricuspid valve thrombosis and 6 with a biologic prosthesis for tricuspid valve deterioration. However, freedom from reoperation at 5 and 10 years was similar between mechanical (86% and 76%) and bioprostheses (97% and 83%). All 16 patients survived the reoperation.
CONCLUSIONS: The present experience suggests that the type of implanted prosthesis in the tricuspid position does not affect early and long-term outcomes or the reoperation rate. Timely referral before end-stage cardiac impairment develops could determine further outcomes improvement.
Copyright © 2012 The Society of Thoracic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22342993     DOI: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2011.12.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  18 in total

1.  Tricuspid valve surgery.

Authors:  C A Mestres; G Fita; V M Parra; J L Pomar; J M Bernal
Journal:  HSR Proc Intensive Care Cardiovasc Anesth       Date:  2012

2.  A case of an explanted 26-year-old Carpentier-Edwards supra-annular valve in the tricuspid position.

Authors:  Shigeki Koizumi; Naoto Fukunaga; Tadashi Ikeda; Tadaaki Koyama
Journal:  J Cardiol Cases       Date:  2016-11-16

3.  The ideal substitute for tricuspid valve replacement in patients with congenital heart disease: an unsolved dilemma.

Authors:  Andrea Garatti; Alessandro Giamberti; Alessandro Frigiola; Lorenzo Menicanti
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2017-04

4.  Tricuspid valve-in-valve implantation for failing bioprosthetic valves: an evolving standard of care.

Authors:  Sidakpal S Panaich; Mackram F Eleid
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-10

Review 5.  A look at recent improvements in the durability of tissue valves.

Authors:  Takahiro Nishida; Ryuji Tominaga
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-01-24

Review 6.  Valve-in-valve implantations: is this the new standard for degenerated bioprostheses? Review of the literature.

Authors:  Krys Milburn; Vinayak Bapat; Martyn Thomas
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2014-01-21       Impact factor: 5.460

7.  Transcatheter valve implantation for degenerated tricuspid bioprosthesis and failed tricuspid ring.

Authors:  Shmuel Chen; Lyle Dershowitz; Isaac George
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-09

Review 8.  Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement: Current State of Art.

Authors:  Wail Alkashkari; Amani Alsubei; Ziyad M Hijazi
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 9.  Impact of Right-Sided-Catheter-Based Valve Implantation on Decision-Making in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Joanna Ghobrial; Jamil Aboulhosn
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Reappraisal of mechanical tricuspid valve replacement in the current era: a single center retrospective study.

Authors:  Byungjoon Park; Dong Seop Jeong; Wook Sung Kim; Kiick Sung; Pyo Won Park
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 2.895

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.