Literature DB >> 22342927

Health-related quality of life and direct costs in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury: single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction in a low-demand cohort--a randomized trial with 2 years of follow-up.

Montserrat Núñez1, Sergi Sastre, Esther Núñez, Luis Lozano, Catia Nicodemo, Josep M Segur.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQL) in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructive surgery by use of 2 procedures and to estimate the direct costs of surgery.
METHODS: We performed a 2-year randomized, prospective intervention study of 2 surgical ACL reconstruction techniques (anatomic single bundle [SB] v double bundle [DB]). Fifty-five consecutive outpatients, with a mean age of 30.88 years, were randomized to SB or DB ACL reconstruction. The Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) was used to measure HRQL (primary outcome). ACL injuries were assessed by the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score (secondary outcome). The use of medical resources and their costs were evaluated.
RESULTS: We included 52 patients in the final analyses (23 in the SB group and 29 in the DB group). At baseline, there were no significant differences in study variables. At 2 years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in SF-36 and IKDC scores between groups. However, compared with baseline, the SF-36 physical function, physical role, bodily pain, social function, and emotional role scores were significantly better in the SB group (P < .05), whereas only the physical function dimension score was better in the DB group (P = .047). IKDC scores at 2 years improved significantly in the SB group (P < .001) and DB group (P = .004) compared with baseline. There was a significant correlation between the SF-36 physical function, physical role, and bodily pain dimensions and the IKDC score at 2 years (P < .05). The costs were € 3,251 for the SB group and € 4,172 for the DB group.
CONCLUSIONS: HRQL and medical outcomes were similar between SB and DB ACL reconstruction techniques, 2 years after surgery. However, the SB technique was more cost-effective.
Copyright © 2012 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22342927     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.11.034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  19 in total

1.  Three-dimensional computed tomography evaluation of anterior cruciate ligament footprint for anatomic single-bundle reconstruction.

Authors:  Guilherme Moreira de Abreu-e-Silva; Mcbrite H G Castro Nunes de Oliveira; Gustavo Silame Maranhão; Lucas de Melo Castro Deligne; Rudolf Moreira Pfeilsticker; Eduardo Nilo Vasconcellos Novais; Tarcizo Afonso Nunes; Marco Antônio Percope de Andrade
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-10-22       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an up-to-date meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xue Li; Chang-peng Xu; Jin-qi Song; Nan Jiang; Bin Yu
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-09-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  A systematic review of single- versus double-bundle ACL reconstruction using the anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction scoring checklist.

Authors:  Neel Desai; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Carola F van Eck; Volker Musahl; Freddie H Fu; Jón Karlsson; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 4.  Central Nervous System Adaptation After Ligamentous Injury: a Summary of Theories, Evidence, and Clinical Interpretation.

Authors:  Alan R Needle; Adam S Lepley; Dustin R Grooms
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  A prospective study to evaluate the clinico-radiological outcomes of arthroscopic single bundle versus double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Ashish Devgan; Rajesh Rohilla; Amanpreet Singh; Milind Tanwar; Radhika Devgan; Karan Siwach
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2016-02-13

6.  Changing Sagittal-Plane Landing Styles to Modulate Impact and Tibiofemoral Force Magnitude and Directions Relative to the Tibia.

Authors:  Yohei Shimokochi; Jatin P Ambegaonkar; Eric G Meyer
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  The Effects of Cognitive Loading on Motor Behavior in Injured Individuals: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Christopher J Burcal; Alan R Needle; Lisa Custer; Adam B Rosen
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-08       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 8.  Single Bundle Versus Double Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mohammed S Alomari; Abdullah A Ghaddaf; Ahmed S Abdulhamid; Mohammed S Alshehri; Mujeeb Ashraf; Hatem H Alharbi
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 1.033

Review 9.  Is double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction superior to single-bundle? A comprehensive systematic review.

Authors:  Haukur Björnsson; Neel Desai; Volker Musahl; Eduard Alentorn-Geli; Mohit Bhandari; Freddie Fu; Kristian Samuelsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 10.  Health Economic Evaluations of Hip and Knee Interventions in Orthopaedic Sports Medicine: A Systematic Review and Quality Assessment.

Authors:  Codie A Primeau; Bryn O Zomar; Lyndsay E Somerville; Ishita Joshi; J Robert Giffin; Jacquelyn D Marsh
Journal:  Orthop J Sports Med       Date:  2021-03-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.