Literature DB >> 22341736

Primary endpoint results of the EVOLVE trial: a randomized evaluation of a novel bioabsorbable polymer-coated, everolimus-eluting coronary stent.

Ian T Meredith1, Stefan Verheye, Christophe L Dubois, Joseph Dens, Jean Fajadet, Didier Carrié, Simon Walsh, Keith G Oldroyd, Olivier Varenne, Seif El-Jack, Raul Moreno, Anita A Joshi, Dominic J Allocco, Keith D Dawkins.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the safety and efficacy of 2 dose formulations of SYNERGY, a novel bioabsorbable polymer everolimus-eluting stent (EES) (Boston Scientific Corp., Natick, Massachusetts) compared with the durable polymer PROMUS Element EES (Boston Scientific Corp.).
BACKGROUND: Durable polymer coatings on drug-eluting stents have been associated with chronic inflammation and impaired healing. Bioabsorbable polymer-coated drug-delivery systems may reduce the risk of late adverse events, including stent thrombosis, and thus the need for prolonged dual-antiplatelet therapy.
METHODS: A total of 291 patients with a de novo lesion ≤28 mm in length, in a coronary artery of ≥2.25 to ≤3.5 mm diameter, were enrolled in the EVOLVE study, a prospective, randomized, single-blind, noninferiority trial. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to PROMUS Element, SYNERGY, or SYNERGY half dose. The primary clinical endpoint was the 30-day rate of target lesion failure, defined as cardiac death or myocardial infarction related to the target vessel, or target lesion revascularization. The primary angiographic endpoint was 6-month in-stent late loss measured by quantitative coronary angiography.
RESULTS: The 30-day primary clinical endpoint of target lesion failure occurred in 0%, 1.1%, and 3.1% of patients in the PROMUS Element, SYNERGY, and SYNERGY half dose groups, respectively. The 6-month in-stent late loss was 0.15 ± 0.34 mm for PROMUS Element, 0.10 ± 0.25 mm for SYNERGY, and 0.13 ± 0.26 mm for SYNERGY half dose (SYNERGY, difference -0.06, upper 95.2% confidence limit: 0.02, p for noninferiority <0.001; SYNERGY half dose, difference -0.03, upper 95.2% confidence limit: 0.05, p for noninferiority <0.001). Clinical event rates remained low and comparable between groups, with no stent thromboses in any group at 6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: The EVOLVE trial confirms the effective delivery of everolimus by a unique directional bioabsorbable polymer system utilizing the SYNERGY stent. (A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Single-Blind Noninferiority Trial to Assess the Safety and Performance of the Evolution Everolimus-Eluting Monorail Coronary Stent System [Evolution Stent System] for the Treatment of a De Novo Atherosclerotic Lesion [EVOLVE]; NCT01135225).
Copyright © 2012 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22341736     DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  36 in total

1.  Twelve or 30 months of dual antiplatelet therapy after drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Laura Mauri; Dean J Kereiakes; Robert W Yeh; Priscilla Driscoll-Shempp; Donald E Cutlip; P Gabriel Steg; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Eugene Braunwald; Stephen D Wiviott; David J Cohen; David R Holmes; Mitchell W Krucoff; James Hermiller; Harold L Dauerman; Daniel I Simon; David E Kandzari; Kirk N Garratt; David P Lee; Thomas K Pow; Peter Ver Lee; Michael J Rinaldi; Joseph M Massaro
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2014-11-16       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  The Current Literature on Bioabsorbable Stents: a Review.

Authors:  Wally A Omar; Dharam J Kumbhani
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 3.  Drug-eluting stents: the past, present, and future.

Authors:  Gregory Katz; Bhisham Harchandani; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 5.113

Review 4.  Highlights of the year in JACC 2012.

Authors:  Anthony N DeMaria; Jeroen J Bax; Gregory K Feld; Barry H Greenberg; Jennifer L Hall; Mark A Hlatky; Wilbur Y W Lew; João A C Lima; Ehtisham Mahmud; Alan S Maisel; Sanjiv M Narayan; Steven E Nissen; David J Sahn; Sotirios Tsimikas
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-01-22       Impact factor: 24.094

5.  Experience with BioMatrix BES and other DES in all-comers setting: a retrospective overview.

Authors:  B K Goyal; B C Kalmath; Ramesh Kawar; Anil Sharma; Bhushan Khemnar; Hrishikesh Rangnekar
Journal:  Indian Heart J       Date:  2013-11-05

6.  Biodegradable polymer stents vs second generation drug eluting stents: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Bhavi Pandya; Sainath Gaddam; Muhammad Raza; Deepak Asti; Nikhil Nalluri; Thomas Vazzana; Ruben Kandov; James Lafferty
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2016-02-26

7.  Nickel-free stainless steel avoids neointima formation following coronary stent implantation.

Authors:  Katsuhito Fujiu; Ichiro Manabe; Makoto Sasaki; Motoki Inoue; Hiroshi Iwata; Eriko Hasumi; Issei Komuro; Yasuyuki Katada; Tetsushi Taguchi; Ryozo Nagai
Journal:  Sci Technol Adv Mater       Date:  2012-12-28       Impact factor: 8.090

Review 8.  Bioresorbable Polymers and Stent Devices.

Authors:  Payam Dehghani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 9.  Technological Advances in Stent Therapies: a Year in Review.

Authors:  Jad Raffoul; Ammar Nasir; Andrew J P Klein
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-04-07

Review 10.  Drug-eluting coronary stents: insights from preclinical and pathology studies.

Authors:  Sho Torii; Hiroyuki Jinnouchi; Atsushi Sakamoto; Matthew Kutyna; Anne Cornelissen; Salome Kuntz; Liang Guo; Hiroyoshi Mori; Emanuel Harari; Ka Hyun Paek; Raquel Fernandez; Diljon Chahal; Maria E Romero; Frank D Kolodgie; Anuj Gupta; Renu Virmani; Aloke V Finn
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2019-07-25       Impact factor: 32.419

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.