Literature DB >> 22341109

Is production pressure jeopardizing the quality of colonoscopy? A survey of U.S. endoscopists' practices and perceptions.

Matthew J Whitson1, Carol A Bodian, James Aisenberg, Lawrence B Cohen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Fatigue is an underestimated cause of underperformance among physicians. There is evidence that fatigue or other byproducts of production pressure may negatively influence the quality of colonoscopy.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the practices and perceptions of U.S. endoscopists regarding the effect of production pressure on the performance of colonoscopy.
DESIGN: We conducted a 40-question online survey to assess endoscopists' practices and perceptions concerning production pressure.
SETTING: A total of 5030 U.S. American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy members. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The proportion of endoscopists responding positively to questions pertaining to the impact of production pressure on colonoscopy practice.
RESULTS: Ninety-two percent of respondents indicated that production pressure influenced one or more aspects of their endoscopic practices. Examples of production pressure included (1) postponing polypectomy for a subsequent session (2.8%), (2) reducing the length of time spent inspecting the colon (7.2%), and (3) proceeding with colonoscopy in a patient with an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio (69.2%). Forty-eight percent of respondents reported witnessing the effects of production pressure on a colleague. Respondents working fee-for-service and those with >10 years since completion of fellowship were more likely to describe their weekly workloads as excessive compared with those who were salaried (81.3% vs 71.3%; P = .01) and <10 years out of training (81% vs 72.7%; P = .01). LIMITATIONS: Nonresponse bias due to low response rate (22.3%).
CONCLUSION: Production pressure influences the conduct of colonoscopy for many endoscopists and could have an adverse effect on the outcome of colorectal cancer screening. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: RE:GIE D 11-01288R1.) The study was an Internet study and did not involve human subjects.
Copyright © 2012 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22341109     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.10.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  8 in total

Review 1.  Performance measures for lower gastrointestinal endoscopy: a European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) quality improvement initiative.

Authors:  Michal F Kaminski; Siwan Thomas-Gibson; Marek Bugajski; Michael Bretthauer; Colin J Rees; Evelien Dekker; Geir Hoff; Rodrigo Jover; Stepan Suchanek; Monika Ferlitsch; John Anderson; Thomas Roesch; Rolf Hultcranz; Istvan Racz; Ernst J Kuipers; Kjetil Garborg; James E East; Maciej Rupinski; Birgitte Seip; Cathy Bennett; Carlo Senore; Silvia Minozzi; Raf Bisschops; Dirk Domagk; Roland Valori; Cristiano Spada; Cesare Hassan; Mario Dinis-Ribeiro; Matthew D Rutter
Journal:  United European Gastroenterol J       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 4.623

2.  Regional differences in healthcare delivery for gastroparesis.

Authors:  Klaus Bielefeldt
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-03-24       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  The water exchange method for colonoscopy-effect of coaching.

Authors:  Fw Leung; R Cheung; Rs Fan; Ls Fischer; S Friedland; Sb Ho; Yh Hsieh; I Hung; Mk Li; S Matsui; Kr McQuaid; G Ohning; A Ojuri; T Sato; Ak Shergill; Ma Shoham; Tc Simons; Mh Walter; A Yen
Journal:  J Interv Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-07-01

4.  Proposed score for the self-assessment of an endoscopy department performance in colonoscopy screening.

Authors:  Ioan Sporea; Alina Popescu; Roxana Sirli; Oliviu Pascu; Cristina Cijevschi Prelipcean; Daniela Dobru; Simona Bota; Diana Gherhardt; Oana Gradinaru; Madalina Popescu
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2017-01-15

Review 5.  Optical imaging technology in colonoscopy: Is there a role for photometric stereo?

Authors:  Benjamin M Shandro; Khemraj Emrith; Gregory Slabaugh; Andrew Poullis; Melvyn L Smith
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2020-05-16

6.  Factors associated with oesophagogastric cancers missed by gastroscopy: a case-control study.

Authors:  Foong Way David Tai; Nicholas Wray; Reena Sidhu; Andrew Hopper; Mark McAlindon
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-07-11

7.  Physician perceptions on colonoscopy quality: results of a national survey of gastroenterologists.

Authors:  Ziad F Gellad; Corrine I Voils; Li Lin; Dawn Provenzale
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Quality of endoscopy reporting at index colonoscopy significantly impacts outcome of subsequent EMR in patients with > 20 mm colon polyps.

Authors:  Gottumukkala Raju; Phillip Lum; William Ross; Selvi Thirumurthi; Ethan Miller; Patrick Lynch; Jeffrey Lee; Manoop S Bhutani; Mehnaz A Shafi; Brian Weston; Boris Blechacz; George J Chang; Katherine Hagan; Asif Rashid; Marta Davila; John Stroehlein
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-02-28
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.