BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend that women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer receive endocrine therapy (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs] or aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for five years following diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine utilization and adherence to therapy for SERMs and AIs in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. DATA: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 15,542 elderly women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in years 2003-2005 (the latest SEER data at the time of the study) and enrolled in a Part D plan in 2006 or 2007 (the initial years of Part D). This permitted us to compare utilization and adherence to therapy at various points within the recommended five-year timeframe for endocrine therapy. SERM and AI use was measured from claim records. Non-adherence to therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio of less than 80 percent. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Between May 2006 and December 2007, 22 percent of beneficiaries received SERM, 52 percent AI, and 26 percent received neither. The percent receiving any endocrine therapy decreased with time from diagnosis. Among SERM and AI users, 20-30 percent were non-adherent to therapy; out-of-pocket costs were higher for AI than SERM and were strongly associated with non-adherence. For AI users without a low income subsidy, adherence to therapy deteriorated after reaching the Part D coverage gap. CONCLUSIONS: Many elderly breast cancer patients were not receiving therapy for the recommended five years following diagnosis. Choosing a Part D plan that minimizes out-of-pocket costs is critical to ensuring beneficiary access to essential medications. Public Domain.
BACKGROUND: Clinical guidelines recommend that women with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer receive endocrine therapy (selective estrogen receptor modulators [SERMs] or aromatase inhibitors [AIs]) for five years following diagnosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine utilization and adherence to therapy for SERMs and AIs in Medicare Part D prescription drug plans. DATA: Linked Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare data. STUDY DESIGN: We identified 15,542 elderly women diagnosed with hormone-receptor positive breast cancer in years 2003-2005 (the latest SEER data at the time of the study) and enrolled in a Part D plan in 2006 or 2007 (the initial years of Part D). This permitted us to compare utilization and adherence to therapy at various points within the recommended five-year timeframe for endocrine therapy. SERM and AI use was measured from claim records. Non-adherence to therapy was defined as a medication possession ratio of less than 80 percent. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Between May 2006 and December 2007, 22 percent of beneficiaries received SERM, 52 percent AI, and 26 percent received neither. The percent receiving any endocrine therapy decreased with time from diagnosis. Among SERM and AI users, 20-30 percent were non-adherent to therapy; out-of-pocket costs were higher for AI than SERM and were strongly associated with non-adherence. For AI users without a low income subsidy, adherence to therapy deteriorated after reaching the Part D coverage gap. CONCLUSIONS: Many elderly breast cancerpatients were not receiving therapy for the recommended five years following diagnosis. Choosing a Part D plan that minimizes out-of-pocket costs is critical to ensuring beneficiary access to essential medications. Public Domain.
Authors: Cynthia Owusu; Diana S M Buist; Terry S Field; Timothy L Lash; Soe Soe Thwin; Ann M Geiger; Virginia P Quinn; Floyd Frost; Marianne Prout; Marianne Ulcickas Yood; Feifei Wei; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Timothy L Lash; Matthew P Fox; Jennifer L Westrup; Aliza K Fink; Rebecca A Silliman Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2006-03-16 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Tiffany H Svahn; Joyce C Niland; Robert W Carlson; Melissa E Hughes; Rebecca A Ottesen; Richard L Theriault; Stephen B Edge; Anne F Schott; Michael A Bookman; Jane C Weeks Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Rajul A Patel; Helene Levens Lipton; Timothy W Cutler; Amanda R Smith; Shirley M Tsunoda; Marilyn R Stebbins Journal: Am J Manag Care Date: 2009-08 Impact factor: 2.229
Authors: Ann H Partridge; Andrea LaFountain; Erica Mayer; Brooke S Taylor; Eric Winer; Aviva Asnis-Alibozek Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2008-01-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Caitlin C Murphy; Simon J Craddock Lee; David E Gerber; John V Cox; Hannah M Fullington; Robin T Higashi Journal: Patient Educ Couns Date: 2019-06-20
Authors: Joan M Neuner; Sailaja Kamaraju; John A Charlson; Erica M Wozniak; Elizabeth C Smith; Alana Biggers; Alicia J Smallwood; Purushottam W Laud; Liliana E Pezzin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Caitlin C Murphy; L Kay Bartholomew; Melissa Y Carpentier; Shirley M Bluethmann; Sally W Vernon Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-06-12 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Alana Biggers; Yushu Shi; John Charlson; Elizabeth C Smith; Alicia J Smallwood; Ann B Nattinger; Purushottam W Laud; Joan M Neuner Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2016-10-24 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Vanessa B Sheppard; Leigh Anne Faul; George Luta; Jonathan D Clapp; Rachel L Yung; Judy Huei-Yu Wang; Gretchen Kimmick; Claudine Isaacs; Michelle Tallarico; William T Barry; Brandelyn N Pitcher; Clifford Hudis; Eric P Winer; Harvey J Cohen; Hyman B Muss; Arti Hurria; Jeanne S Mandelblatt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-06-16 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Joan M Neuner; Yushu Shi; Amanda L Kong; Sailaja Kamaraju; Elizabeth C Smith; Alicia J Smallwood; Purushottam W Laud; John A Charlson Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2017-12-15 Impact factor: 4.442