Joan M Neuner1,2, Yushu Shi3,4, Amanda L Kong3,5, Sailaja Kamaraju3,6,7, Elizabeth C Smith3, Alicia J Smallwood3, Purushottam W Laud3,4, John A Charlson3,6,7. 1. Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. jneuner@mcw.edu. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Suite H3100, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. jneuner@mcw.edu. 3. Center for Patient Care and Outcomes Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 4. Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Health and Equity, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 5. Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA. 6. Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Road, Suite H3100, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA. 7. Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although users of aromatase inhibitors have higher total fracture risk in some randomized trials, little is known about their risk outside of clinical trials or in older higher-risk cohorts. METHODS: In a population-based retrospective cohort study, we identified all older US Medicare D prescription drug insurance plan-enrolled women who had initial breast cancer surgery in 2006-2008 and began hormonal therapy (an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or tamoxifen) within the subsequent year. Total nonvertebral and hip fractures through 2012 were identified using a validated algorithm. The association of fracture outcomes with hormonal therapy type was assessed using competing risk regression models that accounted for differences in measured baseline covariates. Treatment assignment bias was reduced using inverse probability of treatment weighting computed from propensity scores. RESULTS: Among 23,378 women taking hormonal therapy (23.2% aged 80 or over), there were 3000 total and 436 hip fractures. Although AI users were younger and had lower comorbidity, after propensity score weighting, these and other covariates were balanced. Total nonvertebral risk was higher for users of AIs compared with tamoxifen, HR 1.11 (1.02-1.21), but the small increase in risk for hip fracture was not statistically significant, HR 1.04 (0.84-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Although total nonvertebral fracture risk was higher among AI users, differences in hip fractures were not significant in a large population-based cohort of older women. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Use of aromatase inhibitors by older women is associated with high risk for nonvertebral fracture that is increased compared with use of tamoxifen. Fracture risk should be assessed among patients taking these medications.
PURPOSE: Although users of aromatase inhibitors have higher total fracture risk in some randomized trials, little is known about their risk outside of clinical trials or in older higher-risk cohorts. METHODS: In a population-based retrospective cohort study, we identified all older US Medicare D prescription drug insurance plan-enrolled women who had initial breast cancer surgery in 2006-2008 and began hormonal therapy (an aromatase inhibitor (AI) or tamoxifen) within the subsequent year. Total nonvertebral and hip fractures through 2012 were identified using a validated algorithm. The association of fracture outcomes with hormonal therapy type was assessed using competing risk regression models that accounted for differences in measured baseline covariates. Treatment assignment bias was reduced using inverse probability of treatment weighting computed from propensity scores. RESULTS: Among 23,378 women taking hormonal therapy (23.2% aged 80 or over), there were 3000 total and 436 hip fractures. Although AI users were younger and had lower comorbidity, after propensity score weighting, these and other covariates were balanced. Total nonvertebral risk was higher for users of AIs compared with tamoxifen, HR 1.11 (1.02-1.21), but the small increase in risk for hip fracture was not statistically significant, HR 1.04 (0.84-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: Although total nonvertebral fracture risk was higher among AI users, differences in hip fractures were not significant in a large population-based cohort of older women. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Use of aromatase inhibitors by older women is associated with high risk for nonvertebral fracture that is increased compared with use of tamoxifen. Fracture risk should be assessed among patients taking these medications.
Entities:
Keywords:
Breast cancer; Fracture; Hormone therapy; Population based; Post-menopausal
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; José E Alés-Martínez; Angela M Cheung; Rowan T Chlebowski; Jean Wactawski-Wende; Anne McTiernan; John Robbins; Karen C Johnson; Lisa W Martin; Eric Winquist; Gloria E Sarto; Judy E Garber; Carol J Fabian; Pascal Pujol; Elizabeth Maunsell; Patricia Farmer; Karen A Gelmon; Dongsheng Tu; Harriet Richardson Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-04 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Jennifer A Ligibel; A James O'Malley; Maxine Fisher; Gregory W Daniel; Eric P Winer; Nancy L Keating Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Joan M Neuner; Sailaja Kamaraju; John A Charlson; Erica M Wozniak; Elizabeth C Smith; Alana Biggers; Alicia J Smallwood; Purushottam W Laud; Liliana E Pezzin Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-05-12 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W S Browner; J A Cauley; H K Genant; S R Mascioli; J C Scott; D G Seeley; P Steiger Journal: JAMA Date: 1990-02-02 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Sharon H Giordano; Zhigang Duan; Yong-Fang Kuo; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; James S Goodwin Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-06-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Taryn Becker; Lorraine Lipscombe; Steven Narod; Christine Simmons; Geoffrey M Anderson; Paula A Rochon Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Jeffrey R Curtis; Amy S Mudano; Daniel H Solomon; Juan Xi; Mary Elkins Melton; Kenneth G Saag Journal: Med Care Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Paul E Goss; James N Ingle; Kathleen I Pritchard; Nicholas J Robert; Hyman Muss; Julie Gralow; Karen Gelmon; Tim Whelan; Kathrin Strasser-Weippl; Sheldon Rubin; Keren Sturtz; Antonio C Wolff; Eric Winer; Clifford Hudis; Alison Stopeck; J Thaddeus Beck; Judith S Kaur; Kate Whelan; Dongsheng Tu; Wendy R Parulekar Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: William D Leslie; Suzanne N Morin; Lisa M Lix; Saroj Niraula; Eugene V McCloskey; Helena Johansson; Nicholas C Harvey; John A Kanis Journal: Oncologist Date: 2019-07-10
Authors: Marilyn L Kwan; Joan C Lo; Cecile A Laurent; Janise M Roh; Li Tang; Christine B Ambrosone; Lawrence H Kushi; Charles P Quesenberry; Song Yao Journal: J Cancer Surviv Date: 2021-02-09 Impact factor: 4.062