Literature DB >> 22340749

Multicentre investigation on electrically evoked compound action potential and stapedius reflex: how do these objective measures relate to implant programming parameters?

Thierry Van Den Abbeele1, Nathalie Noël-Petroff, Istemihan Akin, Gül Caner, Levent Olgun, Jeanne Guiraud, Eric Truy, Josef Attias, Eyal Raveh, Erol Belgin, Gonca Sennaroglu, Dietmar Basta, Arneborg Ernst, Alessandro Martini, Monica Rosignoli, Haya Levi, Joseph Elidan, Abdelhamid Benghalem, Isabelle Amstutz-Montadert, Yannick Lerosey, Eddy De Vel, Ingeborg Dhooge, Minka Hildesheimer, Jona Kronenberg, Laure Arnold.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to collect data on electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) and electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds (eSRT) in HiResolution(TM) cochlear implant (CI) users, and to explore the relationships between these objective measures and behavioural measures of comfort levels (M-levels).
METHODS: A prospective study on newly implanted subjects was designed. The eCAP was measured intra-operatively and at first fitting through neural response imaging (NRI), using the SoundWave(TM) fitting software. The eSRT was measured intra-operatively by visual monitoring of the stapes, using both single-electrode stimulation and speech bursts (four electrodes stimulated at the same time). Measures of M-levels were performed according to standard clinical practice and collected at first fitting, 3 and 6 months of CI use.
RESULTS: One hundred seventeen subjects from 14 centres, all implanted unilaterally with a HiResolution CII Bionic Ear(®) or HiRes 90K(®), were included in the study. Speech burst stimulation elicited a significantly higher eSRT success rate than single-electrode stimulation, 84 vs. 64% respectively. The NRI success rate was 81% intra-operatively, significantly increasing to 96% after 6 months. Fitting guidelines were defined on the basis of a single NRI measurement. Correlations, analysis of variance, and multiple regression analysis were applied to generate a predictive model for the M-levels. DISCUSSION: Useful insights were produced into the behaviour of objective measures according to time, electrode location, and fitting parameters. They may usefully assist in programming the CI when no reliable feedback is obtained through standard behavioural procedures.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22340749     DOI: 10.1179/1754762810Y.0000000001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int        ISSN: 1467-0100


  8 in total

Review 1.  [Intraoperative audiological-technical diagnostics during cochlear implant surgery].

Authors:  T Wesarg; S Arndt; A Aschendorff; R Laszig; S Zirn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 1.284

2.  Effect of depth of general anesthesia on the threshold of electrically evoked compound action potential in cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ali Eftekharian; Maryam Amizadeh; Kamran Mottaghi; Farhad Safari; Mozhgan Hosseinerezai Mahani; Leila Azadeh Ranjbar; Ali Abdi; Nooshin Mokari
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Reflectance and Stapedial Reflexes.

Authors:  Rachel A Scheperle; Joshua J Hajicek
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2020 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  [Objective measures for setting the processors of cochlear implant systems : Use of discrimination functions and consideration of electrode profiles].

Authors:  S Hoth; I Herisanu; M Praetorius
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 5.  Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Lavin K Entwisle; Sarah E Warren; Jessica J Messersmith
Journal:  Semin Hear       Date:  2018-10-26

6.  Dyna-CT of the temporal bone for case-specific three-dimensional rendering of the stapedial muscle for planning of electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold determination during cochlear implantation directly from the stapedius muscle via a retrofacial approach: a pilot study.

Authors:  Gerd Fabian Volk; René Aschenbach; Maria Gadyuchko; Thomas Bitter; Sven Koscielny; Ulf Teichgräber; Orlando Guntinas-Lichius
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-01-02       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  ARTFit-A Quick and Reliable Tool for Performing Initial Fittings in Users of MED-EL Cochlear Implants.

Authors:  Lutz Gärtner; Timo Bräcker; Mathias Kals; Richard T Penninger; Mareike Billinger-Finke; Thomas Lenarz; Andreas Büchner
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2022-02-11

8.  Automated remote intraoperative cochlear implant device testing (CR220). Is it clinically efficient?

Authors:  Eman A Hajr; Fida A Almuhawas
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.484

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.