Literature DB >> 22339945

Evaluation of zirconium-oxide-based ceramic single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) generated with two CAD/CAM systems compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal single-unit posterior FDPs: a 5-year clinical prospective study.

Paolo Vigolo1, Sabrina Mutinelli.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to determine the success rate of single-unit posterior fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) with zirconia copings generated with two CAD/CAM systems, compared to porcelain-fused-to-metal (PFM) single-unit posterior FDPs after 5 years of function.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2005 to 2006, 60 patients who needed a single-unit FDP on a first molar in the mandibular jaw (left or right) in a private office setting were included in this study. The 60 first mandibular molars were randomly divided into three groups (n = 20): in the control group (group C), 20 PFM FDPs were included. In the other two groups CAD/CAM technology was used for the fabrication of the zirconium-oxide copings: 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Procera system (group P, Nobel Biocare); 20 single-unit posterior FDPs with zirconia copings were generated with the Lava system (group L, 3M ESPE). For the ANOVA follow-up data, the clinical life table method was applied. The statistical analysis was performed using two nonparametric tests, the log-rank test for k-groups and the Fisher exact test.
RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) evaluated together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function; however, clinical data showed that technical problems, such as extended fracture of the veneering ceramic, tended to occur more frequently in the zirconia-ceramic FDP groups. The difference in the frequency of failure was statistically significant only in the comparison of groups C and P.
CONCLUSIONS: Even if no statistically significant difference in the clinical outcome of zirconia-ceramic FDPs of both groups (P and L) considered together and metal-ceramic posterior single FDPs was found at 5 years of function, clinical data showed that the two zirconia-ceramic FDP groups tended to have more frequent clinical problems: for this reason all the clinical and technical variables related to the use of zirconia-ceramic FDPs generated with CAD/CAM systems should be carefully considered prior to all treatment procedures.
© 2012 by the American College of Prosthodontists.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22339945     DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00825.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Prosthodont        ISSN: 1059-941X            Impact factor:   2.752


  12 in total

Review 1.  Do tooth-supported zirconia restorations present more technical failures related to fracture or loss of retention? Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Carla Castiglia Gonzaga; Paula Pontes Garcia; Letícia Maíra Wambier; Fernanda Harumi Oku Prochnow; Luciano Madeira; Paulo Francisco Cesar
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 3.606

2.  Clinical outcomes of zirconia-based implant- and tooth-supported single crowns.

Authors:  Farahnaz Nejatidanesh; Hedayat Moradpoor; Omid Savabi
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-04-25       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Fracture resistance and failure mode of posterior fixed dental prostheses fabricated with two zirconia CAD/CAM systems.

Authors:  Carlos López-Suárez; Esther Gonzalo; Jesús Peláez; Verónica Rodríguez; María-Jesús Suárez
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-04-01

4.  Seven-year prospective clinical study on zirconia-based single crowns and fixed dental prostheses.

Authors:  Gianluca M Tartaglia; Ernesto Sidoti; Chiarella Sforza
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Edge chipping test in dentistry: A comprehensive review.

Authors:  Suzane Boa Nova Brandeburski; Marina Lermenn Vidal; Kaue Collares; Yu Zhang; Alvaro Della Bona
Journal:  Dent Mater       Date:  2020-01-27       Impact factor: 5.304

6.  Effects of porcelain thickness on the flexural strength and crack propagation in a bilayered zirconia system.

Authors:  Viviane Maria Gonçalves de Figueiredo; Sarina Maciel Braga Pereira; Eduardo Bressiani; Márcia Carneiro Valera; Marco Antônio Bottino; Yu Zhang; Renata Marques de Melo
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.698

7.  The Use of the Finite Elements Method (FEM) to Determine the Optimal Angle of Force Application in Relation to Grooves Notched into a Zirconia Coping with the Aim of Reducing Load on a Connection with Veneering Ceramic.

Authors:  Beata Śmielak; Leszek Klimek; Jacek Świniarski
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 8.  Trends in computer-aided manufacturing in prosthodontics: a review of the available streams.

Authors:  Jaafar Abduo; Karl Lyons; Mohammed Bennamoun
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2014-04-08

9.  Fracture Strength of Aged Monolithic and Bilayer Zirconia-Based Crowns.

Authors:  Deborah Pacheco Lameira; Wilkens Aurélio Buarque e Silva; Frederico Andrade e Silva; Grace M De Souza
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 3.411

10.  The effect of zirconia surface architecturing technique on the zirconia/veneer interfacial bond strength.

Authors:  Soo-Bok Her; Kyoung Hun Kim; Sang Eun Park; Eun-Jin Park
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.