Literature DB >> 22337995

Cancer vaccination drives Nanog-dependent evolution of tumor cells toward an immune-resistant and stem-like phenotype.

Kyung Hee Noh1, Young-Ho Lee, Ju-Hong Jeon, Tae Heung Kang, Chih-Ping Mao, T-C Wu, Tae Woo Kim.   

Abstract

Due to the exquisite specificity and potency of the immune system, vaccination is in theory the most precise and powerful approach for controlling cancer. However, current data from clinical trials indicate that vaccination rarely yields significant benefits for cancer patients in terms of tumor progression and long-term survival. The poor clinical outcomes of vaccination are primarily caused by mechanisms of immune tolerance, especially within the tumor microenvironment. Here, we report that vaccination drives the evolution of tumor cells toward an immune-resistant and stem-like phenotype that promotes tumor growth and nullifies the CTL response. The emergence of this phenotype required the transcription factor Nanog, which is induced as a consequence of immune selection. Nanog expression enhanced the stem-like features of tumor cells and protected them from killing by tumor-reactive CTLs. Delivery of siNanog into tumor-bearing mice rendered the tumor vulnerable to immune surveillance and strongly suppressed its growth. Together, our findings show tumor adaptation to vaccination through gain of an immune-resistant, stem-like phenotype and identify Nanog as a central molecular target in this process. Future vaccination technology should consider Nanog an important target to enhance the immunotherapeutic response. ©2012 AACR.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22337995      PMCID: PMC3319841          DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-11-3758

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Res        ISSN: 0008-5472            Impact factor:   12.701


  38 in total

Review 1.  Immunotherapy with CTLs restricted by nonself MHC.

Authors:  H J Stauss
Journal:  Immunol Today       Date:  1999-04

2.  Defining the actual sensitivity and specificity of the neurosphere assay in stem cell biology.

Authors:  Ilyas Singec; Rolf Knoth; Ralf P Meyer; Jaroslaw Maciaczyk; Benedikt Volk; Guido Nikkhah; Michael Frotscher; Evan Y Snyder
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 28.547

Review 3.  Use of tumour-responsive T cells as cancer treatment.

Authors:  Mary L Disis; Helga Bernhard; Elizabeth M Jaffee
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 4.  Cancer immunoediting: from immunosurveillance to tumor escape.

Authors:  Gavin P Dunn; Allen T Bruce; Hiroaki Ikeda; Lloyd J Old; Robert D Schreiber
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 25.606

5.  Ectopic expression of X-linked lymphocyte-regulated protein pM1 renders tumor cells resistant to antitumor immunity.

Authors:  Tae Heung Kang; Kyung Hee Noh; Jin Hee Kim; Hyun Cheol Bae; Ken Y Lin; Archana Monie; Sara I Pai; Chien-Fu Hung; T-C Wu; Tae Woo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 6.  Tumour stem cells and drug resistance.

Authors:  Michael Dean; Tito Fojo; Susan Bates
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Specific recruitment of regulatory T cells in ovarian carcinoma fosters immune privilege and predicts reduced survival.

Authors:  Tyler J Curiel; George Coukos; Linhua Zou; Xavier Alvarez; Pui Cheng; Peter Mottram; Melina Evdemon-Hogan; Jose R Conejo-Garcia; Lin Zhang; Matthew Burow; Yun Zhu; Shuang Wei; Ilona Kryczek; Ben Daniel; Alan Gordon; Leann Myers; Andrew Lackner; Mary L Disis; Keith L Knutson; Lieping Chen; Weiping Zou
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2004-08-22       Impact factor: 53.440

8.  Phase II trial of dendritic cells loaded with antigens from self-renewing, proliferating autologous tumor cells as patient-specific antitumor vaccines in patients with metastatic melanoma: final report.

Authors:  Robert O Dillman; Senthamil R Selvan; Patric M Schiltz; Edward F McClay; Neil M Barth; Carol DePriest; Cristina de Leon; Cheryl Mayorga; Andrew N Cornforth; Kanoe Allen
Journal:  Cancer Biother Radiopharm       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 3.099

9.  Overexpression of NANOG in gestational trophoblastic diseases: effect on apoptosis, cell invasion, and clinical outcome.

Authors:  Michelle K Y Siu; Esther S Y Wong; Hoi Yan Chan; Hextan Y S Ngan; Kelvin Y K Chan; Annie N Y Cheung
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2008-09-04       Impact factor: 4.307

10.  Drug-selected human lung cancer stem cells: cytokine network, tumorigenic and metastatic properties.

Authors:  Vera Levina; Adele M Marrangoni; Richard DeMarco; Elieser Gorelik; Anna E Lokshin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  39 in total

1.  HDAC1 Upregulation by NANOG Promotes Multidrug Resistance and a Stem-like Phenotype in Immune Edited Tumor Cells.

Authors:  Kwon-Ho Song; Chel Hun Choi; Hyo-Jung Lee; Se Jin Oh; Seon Rang Woo; Soon-Oh Hong; Kyung Hee Noh; Hanbyoul Cho; Eun Joo Chung; Jae-Hoon Kim; Joon-Yong Chung; Stephen M Hewitt; Seungki Baek; Kyung-Mi Lee; Cassian Yee; Minjoo Son; Chih-Ping Mao; T C Wu; Tae Woo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2017-07-17       Impact factor: 12.701

2.  RepSox slows decay of CD34+ acute myeloid leukemia cells and decreases T cell immunoglobulin mucin-3 expression.

Authors:  Audrey N Jajosky; James E Coad; Jeffrey A Vos; Karen H Martin; Jamie R Senft; Sharon L Wenger; Laura F Gibson
Journal:  Stem Cells Transl Med       Date:  2014-05-22       Impact factor: 6.940

3.  MC32 tumor cells acquire Ag-specific CTL resistance through the loss of CEA in a colon cancer model.

Authors:  Sang-Yeul Lee; Jeong-Im Sin
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 4.  Concise Review: NANOG in Cancer Stem Cells and Tumor Development: An Update and Outstanding Questions.

Authors:  Collene R Jeter; Tao Yang; Junchen Wang; Hsueh-Ping Chao; Dean G Tang
Journal:  Stem Cells       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 6.277

5.  Gain of HIF-1α under normoxia in cancer mediates immune adaptation through the AKT/ERK and VEGFA axes.

Authors:  Young-Ho Lee; Hyun Cheol Bae; Kyung Hee Noh; Kwon-Ho Song; Sang-kyu Ye; Chih-Ping Mao; Kyung-Mi Lee; T-C Wu; Tae Woo Kim
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 12.531

6.  Comparison of cancer stem cell antigen expression by tumor cell lines and by tumor biopsies from dogs with melanoma and osteosarcoma.

Authors:  Amanda M Guth; Mike Deogracias; Steven W Dow
Journal:  Vet Immunol Immunopathol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 2.046

7.  Targeting Cyclin D-CDK4/6 Sensitizes Immune-Refractory Cancer by Blocking the SCP3-NANOG Axis.

Authors:  Se Jin Oh; Hanbyoul Cho; Suyeon Kim; Suhyun Kim; Kyung Hee Noh; Kwon-Ho Song; Hyo-Jung Lee; Seon Rang Woo; Chel Hun Choi; Joon-Yong Chung; Stephen M Hewitt; Jae-Hoon Kim; Seungki Baek; Kyung-Mi Lee; Cassian Yee; Hae-Chul Park; Tae Woo Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Inhibition of stearoyl-coA desaturase selectively eliminates tumorigenic Nanog-positive cells: improving the safety of iPS cell transplantation to myocardium.

Authors:  Lan Zhang; Yaohua Pan; Gangjian Qin; Lijuan Chen; Tapan K Chatterjee; Neal L Weintraub; Yaoliang Tang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 4.534

9.  Nanog signaling in cancer promotes stem-like phenotype and immune evasion.

Authors:  Kyung Hee Noh; Bo Wook Kim; Kwon-Ho Song; Hanbyoul Cho; Young-Ho Lee; Jin Hee Kim; Joon-Yong Chung; Jae-Hoon Kim; Stephen M Hewitt; Seung-Yong Seong; Chih-Ping Mao; T-C Wu; Tae Woo Kim
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 14.808

Review 10.  Cancer stem cells as targets for immunotherapy.

Authors:  Amy S Codd; Takayuki Kanaseki; Toshihiko Torigo; Zsuzsanna Tabi
Journal:  Immunology       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 7.397

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.