Literature DB >> 2233729

Analysis of the mouse Dhfr/Rep-3 major promoter region by using linker-scanning and internal deletion mutations and DNase I footprinting.

M L Smith1, P J Mitchell, G F Crouse.   

Abstract

The mouse dihydrofolate reductase (Dhfr) promoter region is buried within a CpG island (a region rich in unmethylated CpG dinucleotides), has a high G+C content, and lacks CAAT and TATA elements. The region contains four 48-bp repeats, each of which contains an Sp1-binding site. Another gene, Rep-3 (formerly designated Rep-1), shares the same general promoter region with Dhfr, being transcribed in the direction opposite that of Dhfr. Both genes appear to be housekeeping genes and are expressed at relatively low levels in all tissues. The 5' termini of the major Dhfr transcripts are separated from the 5' termini of the Rep-3 transcripts by approximately 140 bp. This curious structural arrangement suggested that the two genes might share common regulatory elements. To investigate the promoter sequences driving bidirectional transcription, a series of promoter mutations was constructed. These mutations were assayed by a replicating minigene system and by promoter fusions to the chloramphenicol acetyltransferase gene. Linker-scanning mutations that spanned the four repeats produced a variety of mRNA transcript phenotypes. The effects were primarily quantitative, generally reducing the abundance of transcripts for one or both genes. Some mutations affected Dhfr in a qualitative manner, such as by changing the startpoint of one of the major Dhfr transcripts or changing the relative abundance of the two major Dhfr transcripts. Additionally, protein transcription factors that bind to sequences in the mouse Dhfr/Rep-3 major promoter region, potentially affecting expression of either or both genes, were investigated by DNase I footprinting. The results indicate that multiple protein-DNA interactions occur in this region, reflecting potentially complex transcriptional control mechanisms that might modulate expression of either or both genes under different physiological conditions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2233729      PMCID: PMC361398          DOI: 10.1128/mcb.10.11.6003-6012.1990

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Cell Biol        ISSN: 0270-7306            Impact factor:   4.272


  37 in total

1.  Transcription initiation from the dihydrofolate reductase promoter is positioned by HIP1 binding at the initiation site.

Authors:  A L Means; P J Farnham
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 4.272

2.  Transcription factor E2F is required for efficient expression of the hamster dihydrofolate reductase gene in vitro and in vivo.

Authors:  M C Blake; J C Azizkhan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Construction of linker-scanning mutations using a kanamycin-resistance cassette with multiple symmetric restriction sites.

Authors:  M L Smith; G F Crouse
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1989-12-07       Impact factor: 3.688

4.  A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA.

Authors:  F L Graham; A J van der Eb
Journal:  Virology       Date:  1973-04       Impact factor: 3.616

5.  The enzymatic acetylation of chloramphenicol by extracts of R factor-resistant Escherichia coli.

Authors:  W V Shaw
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1967-02-25       Impact factor: 5.157

6.  The Rous sarcoma virus long terminal repeat is a strong promoter when introduced into a variety of eukaryotic cells by DNA-mediated transfection.

Authors:  C M Gorman; G T Merlino; M C Willingham; I Pastan; B H Howard
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Organization and expression of eucaryotic split genes coding for proteins.

Authors:  R Breathnach; P Chambon
Journal:  Annu Rev Biochem       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 23.643

8.  The functional human dihydrofolate reductase gene.

Authors:  M J Chen; T Shimada; A D Moulton; A Cline; R K Humphries; J Maizel; A W Nienhuis
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  1984-03-25       Impact factor: 5.157

9.  Accurate transcription initiation by RNA polymerase II in a soluble extract from isolated mammalian nuclei.

Authors:  J D Dignam; R M Lebovitz; R G Roeder
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1983-03-11       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  Gene engineering by selectable intraplasmid recombination: construction of novel dihydrofolate reductase minigenes.

Authors:  G F Crouse; L New; L A Stivaletta
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1989-12-07       Impact factor: 3.688

View more
  9 in total

1.  Abundant novel transcriptional units and unconventional gene pairs on human chromosome 22.

Authors:  Leonard Lipovich; Mary-Claire King
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12-12       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  Transcription factors binding to the mouse HTF9 housekeeping promoter differ between cell types.

Authors:  M P Somma; I Gambino; P Lavia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1991-08-25       Impact factor: 16.971

3.  Position-dependent transcriptional regulation of the murine dihydrofolate reductase promoter by the E2F transactivation domain.

Authors:  C J Fry; J E Slansky; P J Farnham
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Cell type-specific interactions of transcription factors with a housekeeping promoter in vivo.

Authors:  G Stapleton; M P Somma; P Lavia
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-05-25       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Housekeeping Na,K-ATPase alpha 1 subunit gene promoter is composed of multiple cis elements to which common and cell type-specific factors bind.

Authors:  Y Suzuki-Yagawa; K Kawakami; K Nagano
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  Protein-DNA interactions at the major and minor promoters of the divergently transcribed dhfr and rep3 genes during the Chinese hamster ovary cell cycle.

Authors:  J Wells; P Held; S Illenye; N H Heintz
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  The yeast gene MSH3 defines a new class of eukaryotic MutS homologues.

Authors:  L New; K Liu; G F Crouse
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1993-05

8.  Searching for bidirectional promoters in Arabidopsis thaliana.

Authors:  Quan Wang; Lin Wan; Dayong Li; Lihuang Zhu; Minping Qian; Minghua Deng
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 3.169

9.  A comparative analysis of divergently-paired genes (DPGs) among Drosophila and vertebrate genomes.

Authors:  Liang Yang; Jun Yu
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.260

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.