BACKGROUND: Noninvasive measurements of endothelial function predict future adverse cardiovascular events, but offer limited opportunities for mechanistic insights into phenotypic observations. Subcutaneous adipose arterioles, accessible through minimally invasive methods, provide an opportunity for complimentary mechanistic studies. Limited data relating subcutaneous arteriolar endothelial function, cardiovascular risk factors, and noninvasive measurements of endothelial function currently exist. METHODS: Forty-four subjects underwent noninvasive studies of endothelial function (brachial reactivity (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and digital pulse arterial tonometry (PAT)) and measurements of endothelial-dependent vasodilation of gluteal subcutaneous arterioles to acetylcholine. Arteriolar endothelial function was measured (i) percent vasodilation to maximal acetylcholine dose (10(-5) mol/l) and (ii) total area under the curve (AUC) for the entire acetylcholine dose-response curve (total AUC-acetylcholine (Ach), doses 10(-10)-10(-5) mol/l). RESULTS: Acetylcholine responses were almost completely nitric oxide (NO) dependent. Total AUC-Ach predicted FMD and PAT, but maximal acetylcholine vasodilation was not associated with these measures. A history of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were independent predictors of total AUC-Ach. In regression models, total AUC-Ach independently predicted FMD. CONCLUSIONS: Acetylcholine vasodilator responses in human gluteal subcutaneous arterioles are NO synthase dependent and correlate with cardiac risk factors and in vivo measures of endothelial function. These data suggest subcutaneous arterioles offer an opportunity for translational studies of mechanisms of modulating NO bioavailability relevant to in vivo endothelial function measures.
BACKGROUND: Noninvasive measurements of endothelial function predict future adverse cardiovascular events, but offer limited opportunities for mechanistic insights into phenotypic observations. Subcutaneous adipose arterioles, accessible through minimally invasive methods, provide an opportunity for complimentary mechanistic studies. Limited data relating subcutaneous arteriolar endothelial function, cardiovascular risk factors, and noninvasive measurements of endothelial function currently exist. METHODS: Forty-four subjects underwent noninvasive studies of endothelial function (brachial reactivity (flow-mediated dilation (FMD) and digital pulse arterial tonometry (PAT)) and measurements of endothelial-dependent vasodilation of gluteal subcutaneous arterioles to acetylcholine. Arteriolar endothelial function was measured (i) percent vasodilation to maximal acetylcholine dose (10(-5) mol/l) and (ii) total area under the curve (AUC) for the entire acetylcholine dose-response curve (total AUC-acetylcholine (Ach), doses 10(-10)-10(-5) mol/l). RESULTS:Acetylcholine responses were almost completely nitric oxide (NO) dependent. Total AUC-Ach predicted FMD and PAT, but maximal acetylcholine vasodilation was not associated with these measures. A history of hypertension, diabetes, smoking, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were independent predictors of total AUC-Ach. In regression models, total AUC-Ach independently predicted FMD. CONCLUSIONS:Acetylcholine vasodilator responses in human gluteal subcutaneous arterioles are NO synthase dependent and correlate with cardiac risk factors and in vivo measures of endothelial function. These data suggest subcutaneous arterioles offer an opportunity for translational studies of mechanisms of modulating NO bioavailability relevant to in vivo endothelial function measures.
Authors: Tinoy J Kizhakekuttu; David D Gutterman; Shane A Phillips; Jason W Jurva; Emily I L Arthur; Emon Das; Michael E Widlansky Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2010-07-29
Authors: Piero O Bonetti; Geralyn M Pumper; Stuart T Higano; David R Holmes; Jeffrey T Kuvin; Amir Lerman Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2004-12-07 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Naomi M Hamburg; Michelle J Keyes; Martin G Larson; Ramachandran S Vasan; Renate Schnabel; Moira M Pryde; Gary F Mitchell; Jacob Sheffy; Joseph A Vita; Emelia J Benjamin Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-05-05 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kyra Pyke; Daniel J Green; Cara Weisbrod; Matthew Best; Lawrence Dembo; Gerry O'Driscoll; Michael Tschakovsky Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2009-10-30 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Jennifer L Strande; Michael E Widlansky; Nikos E Tsopanoglou; Jidong Su; JingLi Wang; Anna Hsu; Kasi V Routhu; John E Baker Journal: Cardiovasc Res Date: 2009-04-20 Impact factor: 10.787
Authors: Ivana Grizelj; Ana Cavka; Jing-Tan Bian; Mary Szczurek; Austin Robinson; Shruti Shinde; Van Nguyen; Carol Braunschweig; Edward Wang; Ines Drenjancevic; Shane A Phillips Journal: Microcirculation Date: 2015-01 Impact factor: 2.628
Authors: Shakun Karki; Melissa G Farb; Doan T M Ngo; Samantha Myers; Vishwajeet Puri; Naomi M Hamburg; Brian Carmine; Donald T Hess; Noyan Gokce Journal: Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol Date: 2015-04-23 Impact factor: 8.311
Authors: Yasina B Somani; James A Pawelczyk; Mary Jane De Souza; Penny M Kris-Etherton; David N Proctor Journal: Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol Date: 2019-06-07 Impact factor: 4.733
Authors: Mobin Malik; Tisha M Suboc; Sudhi Tyagi; Nita Salzman; Jingli Wang; Rong Ying; Michael J Tanner; Mamatha Kakarla; John E Baker; Michael E Widlansky Journal: Circ Res Date: 2018-10-12 Impact factor: 17.367
Authors: Seth Truran; Daniel A Franco; Alex E Roher; Thomas G Beach; Camelia Burciu; Geidy Serrano; Chera L Maarouf; Sara Schwab; Jenna Anderson; Joseph Georges; Peter Reaven; Raymond Q Migrino Journal: J Neurosci Methods Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 2.390